States Would Sue to Kill City Internet Service

State legislatures threatened to take the FCC to court to protect restrictions on municipal broadband networks.

Laying down fiber-optic cable in Louisville, CO. 
National Journal
Brendan Sasso
See more stories about...
Brendan Sasso
July 23, 2014, 8:50 a.m.

A group rep­res­ent­ing state le­gis­latures is threat­en­ing to sue to pro­tect re­stric­tions on city-run In­ter­net net­works, claim­ing the pro­jects of­ten waste tax­pay­er money.

The Na­tion­al Con­fer­ence of State Le­gis­latures sent a let­ter Tues­day to the Fed­er­al Com­mu­nic­a­tions Com­mis­sion, say­ing it would file a con­sti­tu­tion­al chal­lenge against any fed­er­al ac­tion to pree­mpt state laws lim­it­ing mu­ni­cip­al broad­band.

“Aside from the con­sti­tu­tion­al chal­lenges, such an at­tempt dis­reg­ards the count­less hours of de­lib­er­a­tion and votes cast by loc­ally elec­ted law­makers across the coun­try and sup­plants it with the im­pulses of a five-mem­ber ap­poin­ted body in Wash­ing­ton, D.C.,” the group wrote.

FCC Chair­man Tom Wheel­er has said he may strike down state laws that re­strict the abil­ity of cit­ies to build their own In­ter­net net­works. Such laws stifle com­pet­i­tion and of­ten leave con­sumers with slower In­ter­net ac­cess, Wheel­er claims.

In a blog post last month, Wheel­er ar­gued that loc­al gov­ern­ments “shouldn’t be stopped by state laws pro­moted by cable and tele­phone com­pan­ies that don’t want that com­pet­i­tion.”

Tele­com and cable com­pan­ies have been lob­by­ing for the state re­stric­tions around the coun­try, ar­guing that it’s not fair for them to com­pete with gov­ern­ment-owned In­ter­net pro­viders. The com­pan­ies claim the city pro­jects dis­cour­age private in­vest­ment and are of­ten ex­pens­ive fail­ures.

In the let­ter to the FCC, the state le­gis­lat­ive group said it shares Wheel­er’s “as­pir­a­tion that every Amer­ic­an have ac­cess to broad­band,” but that it was reas­on­able for 21 states to en­act laws to pre­vent waste­ful pro­jects.

The group urged Wheel­er to “heed the prin­ciples of fed­er­al­ism” and cau­tioned him of “the nu­mer­ous de­cisions by the United States Su­preme Court with re­gard to the re­la­tion­ship between the state and its polit­ic­al sub­di­vi­sions.”

If the FCC tries to strike down a state law, it would likely point to Sec­tion 706 of the Tele­com­mu­nic­a­tions Act, which gives the agency the au­thor­ity to pro­mote the de­ploy­ment of broad­band. State laws that re­strict mu­ni­cip­al broad­band could be in vi­ol­a­tion of that pro­vi­sion, ac­cord­ing to the FCC.

House Re­pub­lic­ans ap­proved an amend­ment to an ap­pro­pri­ations bill last week to bar the FCC from pree­mpt­ing state broad­band laws. The pro­vi­sion, however, is un­likely to pass the Sen­ate.

What We're Following See More »
1.5 MILLION MORE TUNED IN FOR TRUMP
More People Watched Trump’s Acceptance Speech
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

Hillary Clinton hopes that television ratings for the candidates' acceptance speeches at their respective conventions aren't foreshadowing of similar results at the polls in November. Preliminary results from the networks and cable channels show that 34.9 million people tuned in for Donald Trump's acceptance speech while 33.3 million watched Clinton accept the Democratic nomination. However, it is still possible that the numbers are closer than these ratings suggest: the numbers don't include ratings from PBS or CSPAN, which tend to attract more Democratic viewers.

Source:
×