Iranian Hackers Spent Three Years Quietly Attacking 2,000 U.S. Computers

They seem to be getting better and better at infiltrating U.S. systems — and intelligence officials have noticed.

National Journal
Marina Koren
May 29, 2014, 7:45 a.m.

It was the “most elab­or­ate so­cial-en­gin­eer­ing cam­paign” these se­cur­ity re­search­ers had ever seen.

A new re­port from iSight Part­ners, a Dal­las-based com­puter-se­cur­ity firm, ex­posed on Thursday a three-year cyberes­pi­on­age cam­paign car­ried out by Ir­a­ni­an hack­ers. The di­git­al at­tacks, which in­fec­ted about 2,000 U.S. per­son­al com­puters since 2011, tar­geted mem­bers of the U.S. mil­it­ary and Con­gress, as well as dip­lo­mats, lob­by­ists, and Wash­ing­ton-based journ­al­ists.

The long-term cam­paign, dubbed “News­caster” by the se­cur­ity firm, em­ployed a dozen fake so­cial-me­dia ac­counts on sites such as Face­book, Twit­ter, and Linked­In. Hack­ers sent tar­gets links that, when ac­cessed, would un­leash mal­ware. They dir­ec­ted people to fake lo­gin screens to steal their user names and pass­words. They im­per­son­ated journ­al­ists and de­fense con­tract­ors, and even set up a fake news web­site to lure vic­tims.

All signs poin­ted to Ir­an as the source. Nicole Per­l­roth writes in The New York Times:

There were many clues. The fake News­On­Air.org web­site was re­gistered in Tehran and sites that hack­ers used to de­ploy their mal­ware were also hos­ted in Ir­an. The mal­ware that the hack­ers used con­tained sev­er­al Per­sian words. The time stamps of hack­ers’ activ­ity tracked with pro­fes­sion­al work­ing hours in Tehran. They even took the day off on Ir­a­ni­an week­ends and hol­i­days.

An­oth­er tell­tale sign, re­search­ers said, was the con­tent the hack­ers pos­ted on their per­so­nas’ so­cial me­dia. In some cases, they pos­ted Ir­a­ni­an jokes to their Face­book pages. One hack­er used a Face­book page to ask fol­low­ers, “What’s kind of sanc­tion will lead to un­der­min­ing the Ir­a­ni­an na­tion?”

It’s un­clear ex­actly what in­form­a­tion these hack­ers stole. But the fact that such a highly co­ordin­ated at­tack went un­noticed for sev­er­al years sug­gests that the tech­nic­al skills of Ir­a­ni­an hack­ers, usu­ally out­done by far-su­per­i­or Chinese and Rus­si­an hack­ers, are im­prov­ing. This time last year, a wave of at­tacks tar­get­ing Amer­ic­an en­ergy com­pan­ies was traced to Ir­an. Back then, U.S. in­tel­li­gence of­fi­cials were already wor­ried about Ir­a­ni­an hack­ers’ grow­ing tal­ents.

What We're Following See More »
1.5 MILLION MORE TUNED IN FOR TRUMP
More People Watched Trump’s Acceptance Speech
20 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Hillary Clinton hopes that television ratings for the candidates' acceptance speeches at their respective conventions aren't foreshadowing of similar results at the polls in November. Preliminary results from the networks and cable channels show that 34.9 million people tuned in for Donald Trump's acceptance speech while 33.3 million watched Clinton accept the Democratic nomination. However, it is still possible that the numbers are closer than these ratings suggest: the numbers don't include ratings from PBS or CSPAN, which tend to attract more Democratic viewers.

Source:
×