China Hits Back Over Hacking Charges

U.S. accused of relying on “deliberately fabricated facts.”

Chinese people wave flags of the Communist Party of China as they take part in the celebrations to mark the 90th anniversary of the ruling party's founding, in southwest China's Chongqing municipality June 29, 2011.  Chinese President Hu Jintao warned on the 90th birthday of the ruling Communist Party that it still faced "growing pains" and that rampant corruption could lead to a loss in public confidence.  CHINA OUT   AFP PHOTO (Photo credit should read STR/AFP/Getty Images)
National Journal
Brendan Sasso
May 19, 2014, 2:17 p.m.

The Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion’s de­cision to bring crim­in­al charges against mem­bers of the Chinese mil­it­ary is already show­ing signs of strain­ing the U.S. re­la­tion­ship with China.

Shortly after the Justice De­part­ment ac­cused five Chinese of­ficers of hack­ing U.S. com­pan­ies, China an­nounced that it is with­draw­ing from a joint cy­ber­se­cur­ity work­ing group. The U.S. and China launched the work­ing group last year to try to reach agree­ments over the use of cy­ber es­pi­on­age.

Qin Gang, a spokes­man for the Chinese gov­ern­ment, said China will an­nounce more re­tali­ations “as the situ­ation evolves.”

Ac­cord­ing to the in­dict­ments, the five men were mem­bers of a hack­ing group that stole trade secrets from ma­jor U.S. com­pan­ies in­clud­ing West­ing­house, United States Steel, and Al­coa.

But the Chinese spokes­man claimed the charges were “based on de­lib­er­ately fab­ric­ated facts.” He also poin­ted to the Ed­ward Snowden leaks as evid­ence that the U.S. is hy­po­crit­ic­al when it con­demns oth­ers for spy­ing.

“China is a vic­tim of severe U.S. cy­ber­theft, wiretap­ping, and sur­veil­lance activ­it­ies,” he claimed.

When At­tor­ney Gen­er­al Eric Hold­er an­nounced the in­dict­ments Monday, he em­phas­ized that China’s be­ha­vi­or is fun­da­ment­ally dif­fer­ent than spy­ing by the Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Agency. The U.S. may spy on oth­er coun­tries, but it does not steal secrets to give its own com­pan­ies an eco­nom­ic edge, he ar­gued.

Adam Segal, a seni­or fel­low with the Coun­cil on For­eign Re­la­tions, said it’s not likely that China will try to bring crim­in­al charges against NSA of­fi­cials or oth­er mem­bers of the U.S. gov­ern­ment. But he said he ex­pects China to take oth­er steps against the U.S. in the com­ing days.

Segal ex­plained that China doesn’t see an im­port­ant dis­tinc­tion between spy­ing to pro­tect na­tion­al se­cur­ity and spy­ing to help do­mest­ic com­pan­ies.

“There’s not such a clear line between the pub­lic and private sec­tor in China,” he said. “Their con­cep­tion of eco­nom­ic power and na­tion­al power doesn’t really see this dis­tinc­tion.”

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
30 minutes ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
30 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
30 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
30 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
1 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×