You May Have to Pay More Based on Your Race, White House Fears

Report urges agencies to step up enforcement of civil-rights laws.

Shoppers wait in line while shopping at Toys'R'Us in Fort Worth, Texas.
National Journal
Brendan Sasso
May 1, 2014, 11:40 a.m.

People may be pay­ing more for products based on their age or the col­or of their skin, White House of­fi­cials fear.

Busi­nesses are in­creas­ingly col­lect­ing vast amounts of data on con­sumer be­ha­vi­or and as­sem­bling de­tailed pro­files on in­di­vidu­als. That data could lead com­pan­ies — either in­ten­tion­ally or in­ad­vert­ently — to dis­crim­in­ate against people in pri­cing, em­ploy­ment, hous­ing, health care, or oth­er op­por­tun­it­ies, the White House said in a re­port Thursday.

John Podesta, a seni­or ad­viser to Pres­id­ent Obama who led the “big data” re­view group that pre­pared the re­port, warned that new data-min­ing prac­tices threaten to “cir­cum­vent long-stand­ing civil-rights pro­tec­tions.”

The re­port urges gov­ern­ment agen­cies to im­prove their tech­nic­al ex­pert­ise so they can bet­ter spot and crack down on il­leg­al dis­crim­in­a­tion that re­lies on data col­lec­tion.

Firms can track which products people buy, the web­sites they browse, the emails they read, and even their GPS loc­a­tion. That in­form­a­tion can help tar­get more rel­ev­ant ads — such as a pro­mo­tion for a hor­ror film.

But the White House poin­ted to one study which found that people who search for “black-identi­fy­ing” names are more likely to be shown ads with the word “ar­rest” than people who search for “white-identi­fy­ing” names. Gov­ern­ment ser­vices aimed at people us­ing smart­phone apps could dis­ad­vant­age the poor or eld­erly (who are less likely to have smart­phones), the of­fi­cials warned in the re­port.

“‘Big data’ isn’t just a pri­vacy is­sue — it’s also a civil-rights is­sue,” Seeta Peña Gangadhar­an, a seni­or re­search fel­low with the New Amer­ica Found­a­tion, said in a state­ment ap­plaud­ing the White House re­port.

“New tech­no­lo­gies en­abling massive data col­lec­tion and ana­lys­is prom­ise many eco­nom­ic and prac­tic­al be­ne­fits, but they also have a dark side, cre­at­ing new risks of data-driv­en di­git­al dis­crim­in­a­tion and the re­in­force­ment of ex­ist­ing in­equal­it­ies through auto­mated de­cision-mak­ing.”

The re­port also re­it­er­ates the White House’s sup­port for the “Pri­vacy Bill of Rights” — a set of prin­ciples the White House out­lined in 2012 for how on­line firms should handle per­son­al in­form­a­tion. The White House urged Con­gress to en­act the prin­ciples in­to law at the time, but the is­sue has gone nowhere on Cap­it­ol Hill.

Com­merce Sec­ret­ary Penny Pritzker an­nounced Thursday that her de­part­ment will work with busi­nesses and pri­vacy groups to de­vel­op le­gis­lat­ive lan­guage for the prin­ciples.

The Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion also an­nounced plans to ex­pand some fed­er­al pri­vacy pro­tec­tions to people out­side the United States. The Pri­vacy Act of 1974 cur­rently grants U.S. cit­izens rights to ac­cess cer­tain in­form­a­tion that the gov­ern­ment col­lects about them.

But the re­view doesn’t ad­dress Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Agency sur­veil­lance. Obama an­nounced the re­view group of “big data” is­sues in the same speech in Janu­ary when he out­lined re­forms to the NSA. Podesta ex­plained that the pres­id­ent be­lieved “big-data tech­no­lo­gies had to be hav­ing an im­pact else­where.”

Al­though the White House is push­ing for more pri­vacy-pro­tec­tion laws, of­fi­cials em­phas­ized that the col­lec­tion and use of large amounts of data can also lead to in­nov­at­ive new ser­vices and boost the eco­nomy.

For ex­ample, data can help doc­tors ana­lyze and com­bat dis­eases or help sci­ent­ists bet­ter un­der­stand cli­mate change, the White House said.

“We be­gin by re­cog­niz­ing that the United States is a lead­er in the field of big data and we want to en­sure that con­tin­ues,” Pritzker said.

What We're Following See More »
HE ‘WILL NEVER BE PRESIDENT’
Warren Goes After Trump Yet Again
1 hours ago
THE LATEST

When it comes to name-calling among America's upper echelon of politicians, there may be perhaps no greater spat than the one currently going on between Sen. Elizabeth Warren and Donald Trump. While receiving an award Tuesday night, she continued a months-long feud with the presumptive GOP presidential nominee. Calling him a "small, insecure moneygrubber" who probably doesn't know three things about Dodd-Frank, she said he "will NEVER be president of the United States," according to her prepared remarks."We don't know what Trump pays in taxes because he is the first presidential nominee in 40 years to refuse to disclose his tax returns. Maybe he’s just a lousy businessman who doesn’t want you to find out that he’s worth a lot less money than he claims." It follows a long-line of Warren attacks over Twitter, Facebook and in interviews that Trump is a sexist, racist, narcissistic loser. In reply, Trump has called Warren either "goofy" or "the Indian"—referring to her controversial assertion of her Native American heritage. 

FIRST CHANGE IN FOUR DECADES
Congress Passes Chemical Regulations Overhaul
4 hours ago
THE DETAILS

The House on Tuesday voted 403-12 "to pass an overhaul to the nation’s chemical safety standards for the first time in four decades. The Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act aims to answer years of complaints that the Environmental Protection Agency lacks the necessary authority to oversee and control the thousands of chemicals being produced and sold in the United States. It also significantly clamps down on states’ authorities, in an effort to stop a nationwide patchwork of chemical laws that industry says is difficult to deal with."

Source:
NO MORE INDEPENDENT VOTERS?
GOP Could Double Number of Early Primaries
4 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"Leaders of the Republican Party have begun internal deliberations over making fundamental changes to the way its presidential nominees are chosen, a recognition that the chaotic process that played out this year is seriously flawed and helped exacerbate tensions within the party." Among the possible changes: forbidding independent voters to cast ballots in Republican primaries, and "doubling the number of early states to eight."

Source:
LEVERAGE
Kasich Tells His Delegates to Remain Pledged to Him
6 hours ago
THE LATEST

Citing the unpredictable nature of this primary season and the possible leverage they could bring at the convention, John Kasich is hanging onto his 161 delegates. "Kasich sent personal letters Monday to Republican officials in the 16 states and the District of Columbia where he won delegates, requesting that they stay bound to him in accordance with party rules."

Source:
EFFECTIVE NEXT MONTH
House GOP Changes Rules for Spending Measures
6 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"Speaker Paul Ryan is changing the rules of how the House will consider spending measures to try to prevent Democrats from offering surprise amendments that have recently put the GOP on defense. ... Ryan announced at a House GOP conference meeting Tuesday morning that members will now have to submit their amendments ahead of time so that they are pre-printed in the Congressional Record, according to leadership aides." The change will take effect after the Memorial Day recess.

Source:
×