Top Cable Lobbyist: Don’t Make the Internet a Utility

The former FCC chairman battles a new push for regulation.

President and CEO of National Cable & Telecommunications Association Michael Powell speaks at the 30th Annual Walter Kaitz Foundation Fundraising Dinner at The New York Marriott Marquis on October 9, 2013 in New York City.
National Journal
Brendan Sasso
April 29, 2014, 1:04 p.m.

Treat­ing high-speed In­ter­net net­works as util­it­ies would strangle their growth, the top lob­by­ist for the cable in­dustry warned Tues­day.

Mi­chael Pow­ell, the head of the Na­tion­al Cable and Tele­com­mu­nic­a­tions As­so­ci­ation, ac­know­ledged the “in­tu­it­ive ap­peal” of ap­ply­ing util­ity-style reg­u­la­tions to In­ter­net ser­vice pro­viders. In many ways, the In­ter­net has be­come as cent­ral to our lives as roads and elec­tri­city, he said.

But he ar­gued that gov­ern­ment in­ter­ven­tion has de­graded oth­er ser­vices and would only dampen in­vest­ment in broad­band net­works, lead­ing to slower speeds and less ac­cess.

“The potholes vis­ible through your wind­shield, the shiver you feel in a cold house after a snowstorm knocks out the power, and the wa­ter main breaks along your com­mute should re­strain one from em­bra­cing the il­lus­ory vir­tues of pub­lic-util­ity reg­u­la­tion,” Pow­ell, a former chair­man of the Fed­er­al Com­mu­nic­a­tions Com­mis­sion dur­ing the Bush ad­min­is­tra­tion, said in his speech at NCTA’s an­nu­al show in Los Angeles.

He cited stat­ist­ics show­ing that large por­tions of U.S. roads and bridges are in poor con­di­tion. The wa­ter in­fra­struc­ture needs $1 tril­lion in im­prove­ments, and the elec­tric grid needs $768 bil­lion, Pow­ell said.

“Be­cause the In­ter­net is not reg­u­lated as a pub­lic util­ity, it grows and thrives, watered by private cap­it­al and a light reg­u­lat­ory touch,” he said. His group lob­bies for Com­cast, Time Warner Cable, Charter, Cox, and oth­er cable TV and broad­band In­ter­net pro­viders.

Pow­ell’s com­ments come as an ar­ray of lib­er­al ad­vocacy groups are lob­by­ing the FCC to treat broad­band pro­viders the same way it treats tele­phone util­it­ies.

In 2002, as FCC chair­man, Pow­ell clas­si­fied cable-mo­dem In­ter­net ac­cess as an “in­form­a­tion ser­vice” in­stead of a “tele­com­mu­nic­a­tions ser­vice.” The move dra­mat­ic­ally han­di­capped the FCC’s abil­ity to reg­u­late high-speed In­ter­net ac­cess.

In Janu­ary, the D.C. Cir­cuit Court of Ap­peals struck down the FCC’s con­tro­ver­sial net-neut­ral­ity rules. The reg­u­la­tions, first ad­op­ted in 2010, pro­hib­ited In­ter­net ser­vice pro­viders from block­ing web­sites or any “un­reas­on­able” dis­crim­in­a­tion of In­ter­net traffic. The rules were in­ten­ded to en­sure that In­ter­net pro­viders can’t act as “gate­keep­ers” and con­trol what in­form­a­tion people ac­cess on­line.

The court said the FCC was es­sen­tially try­ing to ap­ply a util­ity-style reg­u­la­tion to the In­ter­net. To ad­opt those reg­u­la­tions, the FCC would have to first re­verse Pow­ell’s 2002 de­cision and clas­si­fy broad­band as a “tele­com­mu­nic­a­tions ser­vice.”

In­stead of re­clas­si­fy­ing, cur­rent FCC Chair­man Tom Wheel­er (who headed NCTA from 1976 to 1984) is try­ing to re­work the rules un­der the cur­rent au­thor­ity. To com­ply with the court rul­ing, the new rules will have to be looser.

Un­der Wheel­er’s new pro­pos­al, ISPs would still be barred from block­ing web­sites, but they could charge web­sites for faster ser­vice as long as the ar­range­ments are “com­mer­cially reas­on­able.”

Matt Wood, the policy dir­ect­or for ad­vocacy group Free Press, ar­gued that the FCC should re­clas­si­fy broad­band as a “tele­com­mu­nic­a­tions ser­vice” and en­act tough net-neut­ral­ity rules.

“It would put us back on sol­id foot­ing where we’re not pre­tend­ing that broad­band com­mu­nic­a­tions net­works are some­how not com­mu­nic­a­tions net­works,” Wood said.

“Broad­band is es­sen­tial. It’s the open­ing price for par­ti­cip­at­ing today in our eco­nomy and our demo­cracy.”

In a blog post on Tues­day, Wheel­er em­phas­ized that re­clas­si­fy­ing broad­band as a Title II “tele­com­mu­nic­a­tions ser­vice” re­mains on the table.

“If the pro­pos­al be­fore us now turns out to be in­suf­fi­cient, or if we ob­serve any­one tak­ing ad­vant­age of the rule, I won’t hes­it­ate to use Title II,” Wheel­er wrote. 

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
CITIZENS UNITED PT. 2?
Movie Based on ‘Clinton Cash’ to Debut at Cannes
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."

Source:
×