AT&T and the Federal Communications Commission are in a high-stakes standoff.
The cell-phone carrier is furious over the FCC’s planned rules for an upcoming auction of airwave licenses and is threatening to sit out of the auction entirely.
An AT&T boycott could be devastating for the FCC. The federal government is depending on the auction to generate billions of dollars in revenue to build a nationwide high-speed communications network for first responders and to pay off a 2012 tax cut.
But speaking to reporters on Wednesday, FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler accused AT&T of bluffing. Wheeler said it’s “hard to conceive” of the nation’s second largest wireless carrier not participating in the auction.
The FCC chief noted that AT&T and other carriers have been aggressively lobbying for years to get the FCC to give them access to more spectrum — the frequencies that carry all wireless signals.
“Wireless carriers, including AT&T, have been very forceful and persuasive in making the case that the success of their ability to serve consumers — and therefore the success of their business — depends on additional spectrum,” Wheeler said. “I have a hard time envisioning this once in a lifetime opportunity for this kind of beachfront spectrum being something that people throw up their hands and walk away from.”
Under a plan approved by Congress in 2012, the FCC will pay TV stations around the country to give up their broadcast licenses. The agency will then auction those licenses to wireless carriers to give them access to more airwaves to carry their customers’ traffic.
Wireless networks have become clogged in recent years as consumers increasingly stream videos and browse the Web on their smartphones.
But Wheeler plans to cap the amount of spectrum that AT&T and Verizon — the industry’s two largest companies — can buy in the auction.
The FCC chief has warned that without caps, AT&T and Verizon could buy up all of the low-frequency spectrum, which is especially valuable because it can carry signals over longer distances.
If Sprint and T-Mobile — the smaller of the four national carriers — are boxed out of the auction, it could starve them of the spectrum they need to compete, Wheeler has claimed. Consumers would start fleeing the two smaller carriers if their networks become congested with traffic.
The death of Sprint and T-Mobile would allow Verizon and AT&T to ramp up prices.
In a filing to the FCC earlier this month, AT&T claimed the proposed limits would put the company in an “untenable and unacceptable position.”
The company argued that it’s only worth bidding in the auction if it can gain access to large enough blocks of spectrum to support cell-phone service.
“AT&T has never declined to participate in a major spectrum auction and certainly did not intend to do so here,” Joan Marsh, an AT&T vice president, wrote.
“But if the restrictions as proposed are adopted, AT&T will need to seriously consider whether its capital and resources are directed toward other spectrum opportunities that will better enable AT&T to continue to support high quality LTE network deployments to serve its customers.”
On an earnings call on Tuesday, John Stephens, AT&T’s chief financial officer, appeared to slightly walk back the company’s threat. He said the company is still working with the FCC to “establish auction rules that will certainly promote a good result for AT&T but will also promote a successful result for the auction.”
“So we are interested in participating,” Stephens said.
The FCC is expected to vote on the restrictions on May 14. The auction is scheduled for next year.
What We're Following See More »
President Obama became a surprise topic of contention toward the end of the Democratic debate, as Hillary Clinton reminded viewers that Sanders had challenged the progressive bona fides of President Obama in 2011 and suggested that someone might challenge him from the left. “The kind of criticism that we’ve heard from Senator Sanders about our president I expect from Republicans, I do not expect from someone running for the Democratic nomination to succeed President Obama,” she said. “Madame Secretary, that is a low blow,” replied Sanders, before getting in another dig during his closing statement: “One of us ran against Barack Obama. I was not that candidate.”
It’s all about the 1% and Wall Street versus everyone else for Bernie Sanders—even when he’s talking about race relations. Like Hillary Clinton, he needs to appeal to African-American and Hispanic voters in coming states, but he insists on doing so through his lens of class warfare. When he got a question from the moderators about the plight of black America, he noted that during the great recession, African Americans “lost half their wealth,” and “instead of tax breaks for billionaires,” a Sanders presidency would deliver jobs for kids. On the very next question, he downplayed the role of race in inequality, saying, “It’s a racial issue, but it’s also a general economic issue.”
It’s been said in just about every news story since New Hampshire: the primaries are headed to states where Hillary Clinton will do well among minority voters. Leaving nothing to chance, she underscored that point in her opening statement in the Milwaukee debate tonight, saying more needs to be done to help “African Americans who face discrimination in the job market” and immigrant families. She also made an explicit reference to “equal pay for women’s work.” Those boxes she’s checking are no coincidence: if she wins women, blacks and Hispanics, she wins the nomination.
Under pressure from a judge, the State Department will release about 550 of Hillary Clinton’s emails—“roughly 14 percent of the 3,700 remaining Clinton emails—on Saturday, in the middle of the Presidents Day holiday weekend.” All of the emails were supposed to have been released last month. Related: State subpoenaed the Clinton Foundation last year, which brings the total number of current Clinton investigations to four, says the Daily Caller.