Court Upholds FTC’s Power to Sue Hacked Companies

A federal court rejects a bid from Wyndham Hotels to undercut federal authority over data security.

Wyndham hotel in Pittsburgh, Pa.
National Journal
Brendan Sasso
April 7, 2014, 12:56 p.m.

The Fed­er­al Trade Com­mis­sion has the power to sue com­pan­ies that fail to pro­tect their cus­tom­ers’ data, a fed­er­al court in New Jer­sey said Monday.

The rul­ing shoots down a chal­lenge from Wyndham Ho­tels, which ar­gued that the FTC over­stepped its au­thor­ity with a 2012 law­suit against the glob­al hotel chain.

The de­cision by U.S. Dis­trict Court Judge Es­th­er Salas is a ma­jor win for the agency. If the court had sided with Wyndham, it would have stripped the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment of over­sight of data se­cur­ity prac­tices just as hack­ers be­gin to pull off more and more high-pro­file at­tacks.

Salas said her de­cision “does not give the FTC a blank check to sus­tain a law­suit against every busi­ness that has been hacked,” but that she must fol­low the “bind­ing and per­suas­ive pre­ced­ent” to up­hold the agency’s au­thor­ity.

The FTC is cur­rently in­vest­ig­at­ing Tar­get over the massive hack last year that ex­posed in­form­a­tion on 40 mil­lion cred­it cards. Tar­get could have pre­ven­ted the at­tack with bet­ter se­cur­ity prac­tices, ac­cord­ing to a re­cent re­port from the Sen­ate Com­merce Com­mit­tee.

The FTC has sued dozens of com­pan­ies in re­cent years for fail­ing to take reas­on­able steps to pro­tect cus­tom­er data. The agency says it has the au­thor­ity to po­lice data se­cur­ity prac­tices be­cause Con­gress gave it power over “un­fair” busi­ness prac­tices.

The FTC sued Wyndham in 2012, main­tain­ing that the hotel chain didn’t use ba­sic se­cur­ity meas­ures such as fire­walls, com­plex pass­words, or sep­ar­at­ing net­works in dif­fer­ent loc­a­tions. As a res­ult, hack­ers were able to pen­et­rate a com­puter net­work in a Wyndham hotel in Phoenix and ul­ti­mately make off with in­form­a­tion on 500,000 cred­it cards, the FTC charged.

Wyndham asked the fed­er­al court to throw out the suit, ar­guing that in­ad­equate data se­cur­ity prac­tices aren’t “un­fair” un­der the leg­al defin­i­tion. The com­pany also claimed the FTC should have pub­lished clear rules on data se­cur­ity be­fore fil­ing suit.

But Judge Salas said she wouldn’t “carve out a data-se­cur­ity ex­cep­tion” to the FTC’s power over un­fair prac­tices. She also con­cluded that the agency isn’t re­quired to spell-out spe­cif­ic data se­cur­ity rules. 

Al­though the court dis­missed Wyndham’s at­tempt to block the suit, the FTC will still have to prove the charges.  

FTC Chair­wo­man Edith Ramirez said she’s “pleased” with the de­cision and looks for­ward to try­ing the case against Wyndham. 

“Com­pan­ies should take reas­on­able steps to se­cure sens­it­ive con­sumer in­form­a­tion,” she said. “When they do not, it is not only ap­pro­pri­ate but crit­ic­al that the FTC take ac­tion on be­half of con­sumers.”

Mi­chael Valentino, a Wyndham spokes­man, noted that the de­cision is lim­ited to the FTC’s power and does not ad­dress wheth­er Wyndham broke the law.   “We con­tin­ue to be­lieve the FTC lacks the au­thor­ity to pur­sue this type of case against Amer­ic­an busi­nesses, and has failed to pub­lish any reg­u­la­tions that would give such busi­nesses fair no­tice of any pro­posed stand­ards for data se­cur­ity,” he said. “We in­tend to de­fend our po­s­i­tion vig­or­ously.”  

Mi­chael Valentino, a Wyndham spokes­man, noted that the de­cision is lim­ited to the FTC’s power and does not ad­dress wheth­er Wyndham broke the law.

“We con­tin­ue to be­lieve the FTC lacks the au­thor­ity to pur­sue this type of case against Amer­ic­an busi­nesses, and has failed to pub­lish any reg­u­la­tions that would give such busi­nesses fair no­tice of any pro­posed stand­ards for data se­cur­ity,” he said. “We in­tend to de­fend our po­s­i­tion vig­or­ously.” 

Al­though the FTC can or­der com­pan­ies to change their busi­ness prac­tices, the agency has no fin­ing au­thor­ity. Demo­crats are push­ing sev­er­al bills in Con­gress that would ex­pand the FTC’s au­thor­ity over data se­cur­ity, in­clud­ing give the agency the power to fine com­pan­ies for non­com­pli­ance.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
CITIZENS UNITED PT. 2?
Movie Based on ‘Clinton Cash’ to Debut at Cannes
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."

Source:
×