Microsoft is in full damage-control mode after it sparked a public backlash by snooping on the emails of a blogger.
The company said Friday that it will no longer go through the emails of users who are suspected of stealing physical or intellectual property from Microsoft. Instead, the company will refer the cases to law enforcement.
Microsoft is making the change to its company policy immediately and plans to update its customer terms of service.
Last week, Microsoft revealed in court filings that its investigators had accessed the private Hotmail account of an unnamed French blogger who allegedly received stolen Windows code from a Microsoft employee. The blogger was not accused of any wrongdoing, but the FBI used the evidence Microsoft pulled from the blogger’s email account to bring charges against the employee who allegedly leaked the information.
Privacy activists were outraged that Microsoft had not gone through any formal legal process before reading a user’s emails. The controversy was especially damaging because Microsoft has tried to attract new users by boasting about its privacy protections. The company has aired ads claiming Google “scroogles” its users by invading their privacy.
“It’s always uncomfortable to listen to criticism,” Brad Smith, Microsoft’s general counsel, wrote in a blog post. “But if one can step back a bit, it’s often thought-provoking and even helpful. That was definitely the case for us over the past week.”
He insisted that the company was “clearly” within its legal rights to search the user’s email account, but he said the company has realized it should rely on formal legal procedures even when users are suspected of stealing from Microsoft.
Justin Brookman, the director of consumer privacy at the Center for Democracy and Technology, called the change in policy a “really good step.” But he noted the announcement is limited to the narrow circumstances when Microsoft suspects a user of trafficking in Microsoft property.
Most companies write privacy policies that give them sweeping authority to access user data, Brookman explained.
“People don’t read those things very closely so there isn’t a lot of cost in saying, ‘We reserve the right to go in whenever we want,’ ” he said. “Maybe this will get people in general to be a little more cautious.”
What We're Following See More »
The great restroom war of 2016 continues apace, as eleven states have sued the Obama administration in federal court, claiming its federal guidance on how schools should accommodate transgender students "has no basis in law." "The lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas on behalf of Alabama, Arizona, Georgia, Louisiana, Maine, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, West Virginia and Wisconsin. The lawsuit argues that the federal government has worked to turn workplaces and schools 'into laboratories for a massive social experiment.'"
By a 29-10 vote, the House Natural Resources Committee today passed the bill to allow Puerto Rico to restructure its $70 billion in debt. The legislation "would establish an oversight board to help the commonwealth restructure its un-payable debt and craft an economic recovery plan."
"Though every major party nominee since 1976 has released his tax returns while running for president, the practice has never been required by law. Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR) wants to change that. The senior Democrat on the Senate Finance Committee, which handles tax issues, introduced a bill on Wednesday that would force presidential candidates to release their most recent tax returns. The Presidential Tax Transparency Act, as the bill is called, would require candidates to make their latest three years of tax returns public no later than 15 days after becoming the nominee."
"The U.S. Capitol does not meet the federal government’s own standards for accommodations for new mothers," according to an investigation by NBC Channel 4. "Though the U.S. General Services Administration, a government agency which oversees the management of federal government buildings, requires a minimum number of lactation stations and changing tables, Congress is exempt from the rules and fails to meet those standards." The Capitol grounds have 12 lactations stations, far short of the 42 that would be required given the number of female workers there.