U.S. Government to Give Up Key Internet Powers

The United States will turn over control to the “global Internet community.”

A screen shows a rolling feed of new 'Generic Top-Level Domain Names (gTLDs) which have been applied for during a press conference hosted by ICANN in central London, on June 13, 2012. The US-based Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) was to reveal details of 1,930 requests for new web address endings at a press conference in London. The California-based body says the huge expansion of the Internet, with two billion users around the world, half of them in Asia, means the new names are essential.
National Journal
Brendan Sasso
See more stories about...
Brendan Sasso
March 14, 2014, 1:48 p.m.

Fa­cing in­ter­na­tion­al pres­sure, the U.S. gov­ern­ment said Fri­day it will give up con­trol over im­port­ant tech­nic­al as­pects of the In­ter­net.

The Com­merce De­part­ment will no longer over­see the In­ter­net Cor­por­a­tion of As­signed Names and Num­bers, a non­profit group that man­ages the In­ter­net’s ad­dress sys­tem.

Larry Strick­ling, the as­sist­ant sec­ret­ary of Com­merce for com­mu­nic­a­tions and in­form­a­tion, said the “glob­al In­ter­net com­munity” will have the fi­nal say over the data­base of names and ad­dresses that al­lows com­puters around the world to com­mu­nic­ate with each oth­er.

The In­ter­net was in­ven­ted in the United States, and the coun­try has long main­tained a cent­ral role. But as the In­ter­net has grown, oth­er coun­tries have de­man­ded a great­er voice in its gov­ernance.

Ed­ward Snowden’s leaks about the Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Agency’s mass-sur­veil­lance pro­grams have ex­acer­bated re­sent­ment over the cent­ral role of the United States in man­aging the In­ter­net.

But of­fi­cials ar­gued the trans­ition is not a re­sponse to the in­ter­na­tion­al con­tro­versy over NSA spy­ing. Strick­ling said the U.S. over­sight of the In­ter­net’s do­main sys­tem was al­ways meant to be tem­por­ary.

“The tim­ing is right to start the trans­ition pro­cess,” he said. “We look for­ward to IC­ANN con­ven­ing stake­hold­ers across the glob­al In­ter­net com­munity to craft an ap­pro­pri­ate trans­ition plan.”

Fadi Chehadé, the pres­id­ent and CEO of IC­ANN, said he will work with gov­ern­ments, busi­nesses, and non­profits to es­tab­lish a new sys­tem for man­aging the In­ter­net’s do­main sys­tem.

“All stake­hold­ers de­serve a voice in the man­age­ment and gov­ernance of this glob­al re­source as equal part­ners,” he said.

The U.S. gov­ern­ment will con­tin­ue its role un­til its cur­rent con­tract with IC­ANN ex­pires in Septem­ber 2015.

Strick­ling said IC­ANN’s pro­pos­al must meet cer­tain cri­ter­ia, in­clud­ing that it “main­tain the open­ness of the In­ter­net” and pre­serve se­cur­ity and sta­bil­ity. He in­sisted that for­eign gov­ern­ments and in­ter­gov­ern­ment­al groups will not gain new powers over the In­ter­net.

But some busi­ness groups are nervous about what the trans­ition will mean.

Daniel Castro, an ana­lyst for the In­form­a­tion Tech­no­logy and In­nov­a­tion Found­a­tion, a pro-busi­ness think tank, warned that giv­ing up the tra­di­tion­al U.S. over­sight role could res­ult in “a splintered In­ter­net that would stifle in­nov­a­tion, com­merce, and the free flow and di­versity of ideas that are bed­rock ten­ets of world’s biggest eco­nom­ic en­gine.”

Bob Li­odice, the CEO of the As­so­ci­ation of Na­tion­al Ad­vert­isers, said he is “very dis­ap­poin­ted” with the an­nounce­ment. His group has battled with IC­ANN for sev­er­al years over its plan to al­low for thou­sands of new Web ad­dress end­ings bey­ond the tra­di­tion­al “.com” and “.org.”

“We saw the U.S. re­lax ac­count­ab­il­ity with the re­cent do­main name ex­pan­sion,” he said. “In a world without U.S. over­sight, we worry that such is­sues will be fur­ther ag­grav­ated po­ten­tially caus­ing sig­ni­fic­ant eco­nom­ic con­cerns, con­sumer con­fu­sion and impair­ment to brand own­er­ship.”

Sen. Jay Rock­e­feller, the Demo­crat­ic chair­man of the Sen­ate Com­merce Com­mit­tee, has been a fre­quent crit­ic of IC­ANN’s de­cisions. But he said Fri­day that the an­nounce­ment is con­sist­ent with U.S. ef­forts to en­sure the In­ter­net is free from gov­ern­ment con­trol.

“Since 1998, the U.S. has been com­mit­ted to trans­ition­ing man­age­ment of the In­ter­net’s do­main name sys­tem to an in­de­pend­ent en­tity that re­flects the broad di­versity of the glob­al In­ter­net com­munity,” he said.

What We're Following See More »
“MUST NEVER BE PRESIDENT”
Elizabeth Warren Goes After Donald Trump
16 minutes ago
THE DETAILS

In a stark contrast from Michelle Obama's uplifting speech, Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren spoke about the rigged system plaguing Americans before launching into a full-throated rebuke of GOP nominee Donald Trump. Trump is "a man who has never sacrificed anything for anyone," she claimed, before saying he "must never be president of the United States." She called him divisive and selfish, and said the American people won't accept his "hate-filled America." In addition to Trump, Warren went after the Republican Party as a whole. "To Republicans in Congress who said no, this November the American people are coming for you," she said.

FLOTUS OFFERS STRONG ENDORSEMENT OF CLINTON
Michelle Obama: “I Trust” Hillary Clinton
36 minutes ago
THE DETAILS

"In this election, and every election, it's about who will have the power to shape our children for the next four or eight years of their lives," Michelle Obama said. "There is only one person who I trust with that responsibility … and that is our friend Hillary Clinton." In a personal and emotional speech, Michelle Obama spoke about the effect that angry oppositional rhetoric had on her children and how she chose to raise them. "When they go low, we go high," Obama said she told her children about dealing with bullies. Obama stayed mostly positive, but still offered a firm rebuke of Donald Trump, despite never once uttering his name. "The issues a president faces cannot be boiled down to 140 characters," she said.

SANDERS BACKER CONFRONTS STUBBORN SANDERS SUPPORTERS
Sarah Silverman to Bernie or Bust: “You’re Being Ridiculous”
1 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Many Bernie Sanders delegates have spent much of the first day of the Democratic National Convention resisting unity, booing at mentions of Hillary Clinton and often chanting "Bernie! Bernie!" Well, one of the most outspoken Bernie Sanders supporters just told them to take a seat. "To the Bernie-or-bust people: You're being ridiculous," said comedian Sarah Silverman in a brief appearance at the Convention, minutes after saying that she would proudly support Hillary Clinton for president.

‘INEXCUSABLE REMARKS’
DNC Formally Apologizes to Bernie Sanders
5 hours ago
THE LATEST

The Democratic National Committee issued a formal apology to Bernie Sanders today, after leaked emails showed staffers trying to sabotage his presidential bid. "On behalf of everyone at the DNC, we want to offer a deep and sincere apology to Senator Sanders, his supporters, and the entire Democratic Party for the inexcusable remarks made over email," DNC officials said in the statement. "These comments do not reflect the values of the DNC or our steadfast commitment to neutrality during the nominating process. The DNC does not—and will not—tolerate disrespectful language exhibited toward our candidates."

Source:
STILL A ‘SAFE SEAT’
DCCC Won’t Aid Wasserman Schultz
6 hours ago
THE LATEST

The chairman of the DCCC said Debbie Wasserman Schultz won't be getting financial help from the organization this year, even as she faces a well-funded primary challenger. "Rep. Ben Ray Luján (D-NM) said the committee’s resources will be spent helping Democrats in tough races rather than those in seats that are strongholds for the party." Executive Director Kelly Ward added, “We never spend money in safe seats."

Source:
×