Key NSA Defender Wants to End Bulk Data Collection

Dutch Ruppersberger has a plan to overhaul the controversial spying program.

Rep. "Dutch" Ruppersberger interview
National Journal
Brendan Sasso
March 13, 2014, 7:41 a.m.

One of the top sup­port­ers of the Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Agency is now call­ing for an end to the agency’s con­tro­ver­sial prac­tice of col­lect­ing data on mil­lions of U.S. phone calls.

Un­der the pro­pos­al from Rep. Dutch Rup­pers­ber­ger, the top Demo­crat on the House In­tel­li­gence Com­mit­tee, the phone com­pan­ies, not the NSA, would hold the phone data. NSA ana­lysts could ac­cess the re­cords only if they first ob­tain an or­der from the For­eign In­tel­li­gence Sur­veil­lance Court.

His pro­pos­al would not im­pose any man­date on the phone com­pan­ies to main­tain the data — an idea that would face fierce res­ist­ance from civil-liber­ties groups and the phone com­pan­ies them­selves.

In an in­ter­view with Na­tion­al Journ­al, Rup­pers­ber­ger ar­gued that a new data-re­ten­tion man­date is un­ne­ces­sary be­cause the Fed­er­al Com­mu­nic­a­tions Com­mis­sion already re­quires phone com­pan­ies to main­tain their re­cords for 18 months in case there are dis­putes over billing.

Most NSA searches in­volve phone calls that are less than 18 months old, ac­cord­ing to Rup­pers­ber­ger.

The pro­pos­al is a shift for the Demo­crat­ic law­maker, who is one of the most vo­cal de­fend­ers of the NSA on Cap­it­ol Hill.

“I rep­res­ent NSA,” said Rup­pers­ber­ger, whose dis­trict in­cludes NSA’s headquar­ters in Fort Meade, Md. “NSA and the people who work there do an ex­cel­lent job.”

But he ac­know­ledged that in the wake of the leaks by Ed­ward Snowden, there is now a wide­spread view that the agency is in­vad­ing people’s pri­vacy.

“We’ve got to find a way to get the con­fid­ence of the Amer­ic­an people back so they will re­spect NSA as much as they re­spect the mil­it­ary,” he said.

He ar­gued that his plan would bol­ster pri­vacy pro­tec­tions while main­tain­ing the NSA’s abil­ity to un­cov­er ter­ror­ist plots.

Rup­pers­ber­ger pro­pos­al is in line with Pres­id­ent Obama’s goal of giv­ing up NSA con­trol of the phone data­base while main­tain­ing the pro­gram’s cap­ab­il­ity. The ad­min­is­tra­tion is cur­rently re­view­ing sev­er­al op­tions for over­haul­ing the pro­gram, in­clud­ing hav­ing phone com­pan­ies hold the data and giv­ing the data to a third-party group.

The White House is ex­pec­ted to an­nounce its plan for the pro­gram be­fore March 28.

But Rup­pers­ber­ger warned that no mat­ter what plan the White House comes up with, the pro­gram could ex­pire next year when the For­eign In­tel­li­gence Sur­veil­lance Act is up for re­new­al.

He said he is work­ing with House In­tel­li­gence Com­mit­tee Chair­man Mike Ro­gers on le­gis­la­tion that would re­vamp and ex­tend the law.

“I’m not sure wheth­er we could get the votes to pass an­oth­er FISA bill,” Rup­pers­ber­ger said. “Mike and I real­ize we have to make a change.”

But he ac­know­ledged that the House In­tel­li­gence chair­man is not on board yet with his pro­pos­al to lim­it the NSA phone sweeps.

In an emailed state­ment, Ro­gers said he con­tin­ues to work with Rup­pers­ber­ger and oth­er law­makers “to craft a pro­pos­al that will ad­dress the con­cerns around bulk data stor­age, pro­tect civil liber­ties, in­crease trans­par­ency and con­fid­ence in the gov­ern­ment’s in­tel­li­gence-col­lec­tion activ­it­ies, and main­tain a tar­geted cap­ab­il­ity for coun­terter­ror­ism op­er­a­tions.”

Caitlin Hay­den, a White House spokes­per­son, said the pres­id­ent hasn’t de­cided yet on his plan for the pro­gram. 

Rup­pers­ber­ger’s pro­pos­al would not strengthen the stand­ard NSA ana­lysts need to meet be­fore re­view­ing phone re­cords. Cur­rently, the NSA col­lects mil­lions of re­cords, but only ac­cesses the data­base if there is a “reas­on­able, ar­tic­ul­able sus­pi­cion” that a phone num­ber is con­nec­ted to ter­ror­ism.

Un­der the USA Free­dom Act, a tough­er bill from GOP Rep. Jim Sensen­bren­ner and Demo­crat­ic Sen. Patrick Leahy, the NSA would need to show that a re­cord is rel­ev­ant to a ter­ror­ism in­vest­ig­a­tion and per­tains to an agent of a “for­eign power.”

But Rup­pers­ber­ger ar­gued that the USA Free­dom Act’s stand­ard is too re­strict­ive.

“In my opin­ion that would put our coun­try at risk,” he said. The Mary­land Demo­crat ar­gued that in­tel­li­gence agents are try­ing to thwart ter­ror­ist at­tacks and they shouldn’t be held to the same stand­ard as po­lice or pro­sec­utors try­ing to ob­tain evid­ence for a tri­al after the crime has already been com­mit­ted.

In a state­ment, Sensen­bren­ner ap­plauded Rup­pers­ber­ger for agree­ing that bulk data col­lec­tion should end and urged him to sign on to the USA Free­dom Act. 

“It strikes the prop­er bal­ance between se­cur­ity and pri­vacy, and I am con­fid­ent it has the votes to pass,” Sensen­bren­ner said. 

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
10 hours ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
10 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
10 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
10 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
11 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×