PayPal Billionaire, Boeing Battle Over Who Can Build a Better Space Taxi

Elon Musk thinks his company can do a better job of sending military satellites into space, and he wants Congress’s help to break into the game.

A SpaceX rocket takes off on a 2012 mission for NASA.
National Journal
Alex Brown
March 5, 2014, 10:38 a.m.

Bil­lion­aire en­tre­pren­eur Elon Musk has a plan to launch mil­it­ary satel­lites that he claims could save the gov­ern­ment hun­dreds of mil­lions, but to make it work, he says he needs Con­gress’s help to break up a mil­it­ary-in­dus­tri­al mono­poly.

“Com­pet­i­tion and the free mar­ket is a good thing,” Musk told Con­gress on Wed­nes­day, es­tim­at­ing that his SpaceX rock­ets would cost nearly $300 mil­lion less per launch if giv­en the op­por­tun­ity to com­pete with United Launch Al­li­ance — a part­ner­ship of Boe­ing and Lock­heed Mar­tin that the mil­it­ary cur­rently re­lies on to ferry its satel­lites.

SpaceX ships have already con­duc­ted re­sup­ply mis­sions for NASA to the In­ter­na­tion­al Space Sta­tion, but have found it more dif­fi­cult to break in­to the De­fense De­part­ment’s launch pro­gram.

At present, the Air Force is slated to buy up to 36 rock­ets from ULA, while an­oth­er 14 will be made open to com­pet­i­tion for SpaceX and oth­er com­pan­ies. ULA CEO Mi­chael Gass said his com­pany’s ex­clus­ive role in mil­it­ary launches is a good thing, of­fer­ing re­li­ab­il­ity (the com­pany boasts 68 straight suc­cess­ful launches; Musk and Gass had a back-and-forth over each com­pany’s mis­haps and what con­sti­tutes a “suc­cess­ful” launch) and pre­vent­ing spend­ing on re­dund­ant tech­no­logy.

But Musk took is­sue with the re­li­ab­il­ity ar­gu­ment, us­ing events in Ukraine to un­der­cut ULA’s stand­ing. “It makes no sense to claim that ULA’s At­las V [rock­et] provides as­sured ac­cess to space when it de­pends on a Rus­si­an en­gine,” he told re­port­ers after the hear­ing. “In light of Rus­sia’s re­cent ac­tions, with the de facto an­nex­a­tion of Ukraine’s Crimea re­gion and the fact that we’ve severed mil­it­ary ties with Rus­sia — we’re con­tem­plat­ing sanc­tions — it does not make sense to award Rus­sia right now with a huge multi-hun­dred-mil­lion dol­lar con­tract for rock­et en­gines.”

He pro­posed that SpaceX’s Fal­con rock­ets could re­place the At­las V, with ULA still provid­ing its Delta rock­ets to the mil­it­ary.

Gass countered that his com­pany has a two-year sup­ply of At­las V en­gines already stock­piled, mean­ing near-term ten­sions between the two coun­tries are un­likely to keep the U.S. out of or­bit. “We are not at any risk,” he said.

Sen. Di­anne Fein­stein — a Cali­for­nia Demo­crat whose state hosts both SpaceX and some ULA launches — came to Musk’s aid, pro­du­cing a chart from the Gov­ern­ment Ac­count­ab­il­ity Of­fice that showed spend­ing in­creas­ing rap­idly after Boe­ing and Lock­heed merged their launch pro­grams. “The costs to the gov­ern­ment, to the tax­pay­er, have skyrock­eted,” she said. “Com­pet­i­tion is the Amer­ic­an ba­sic de­mand for the ac­cord­ance of a con­tract. So what keeps us from do­ing this?”

Ad­ded Musk: “When Boe­ing and Lock­heed merged, the point at which they stopped be­ing com­pet­it­ors, the costs doubled,” The gov­ern­ment, he said, fur­ther di­min­ishes com­pet­i­tion with a bil­lion-dol­lar an­nu­al pay­ment — which he re­ferred as a sub­sidy — to ULA. He ar­gued that fund­ing “ex­clus­ively in sup­port of the in­cum­bent pro­vider” should be elim­in­ated, or at least factored in­to cost ana­lyses when ULA com­petes for con­tracts.

That pay­ment, known as the ELC, is cru­cial for en­sur­ing ULA’s read­i­ness to meet Amer­ica’s space needs, even when de­mand ebbs, Gass replied. “The na­tion needs a launch vehicle com­pany to stand ready,” he said.

Sen. Richard Shelby — whose home state of Alabama hosts ULA’s pro­duc­tion plant — praised the com­pany’s track re­cord. The Re­pub­lic­an ar­gued that com­pet­i­tion, while gen­er­ally a driver of pro­gress, could lead to “du­plic­a­tion of ex­ist­ing in­fra­struc­ture” and ex­pressed skep­ti­cism at “re-cre­at­ing the wheel.” He also pressed Musk on a SpaceX en­gine fail­ure that sent a cargo ship in­to the wrong or­bit.

Mean­while, Gass used an ar­gu­ment Musk couldn’t — his know­ledge of clas­si­fied tech­no­logy — to in­sist that get­ting mul­tiple com­pan­ies the cap­ab­il­ity to handle such pay­loads isn’t feas­ible. “Those mis­sions can’t work in a com­pet­it­ive com­mer­cial en­vir­on­ment,” he said. “If you don’t have a win­ner-take-all, sur­viv­al of the fit­test com­pet­i­tion “¦ it doesn’t work.”

Musk replied that his com­pany is pre­pared to meet the needs of any mil­it­ary launch, adding that ex­pan­ded cap­ab­il­it­ies are built in­to its cost es­tim­ates. He dis­missed the no­tion that ULA’s longer track re­cord should give it the edge in launch­ing mil­it­ary satel­lites. “Re­li­ab­il­ity is a key factor in com­pet­i­tion. It doesn’t be­come less im­port­ant; it be­comes more im­port­ant,” he said. “If our rock­ets are good enough for NASA, why are they not good enough for the Air Force?”

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
17 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Maher Weighs in on Bernie, Trump and Palin
18 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.

Source:
×