Obama Administration Backs TV Giants’ Bid to Kill Aereo

The solicitor general says the video site is stealing content.

  he Supreme Court will begin hearing oral arguments on the President Obama's health care reform bill in Washington The United States Supreme Court is seen one day before the court will begin hearing arguments on the constitutionality of President Barack Obama's health care reform bill, in Washington on March 25, 2012. UPI/Kevin Dietsch    
National Journal
Brendan Sasso
See more stories about...
Brendan Sasso
March 3, 2014, 1:23 p.m.

The Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion has sided with tele­vi­sion broad­casters in their bid to shut down video-stream­ing site Aereo.

In a brief to the Su­preme Court, the U.S. So­li­cit­or Gen­er­al’s Of­fice said that Aereo’s “un­au­thor­ized In­ter­net re­trans­mis­sions” vi­ol­ate copy­right law.

The fil­ing is a ma­jor blow to Aereo, which al­lows cus­tom­ers to watch and re­cord broad­cast TV on their com­puters, mo­bile devices, or In­ter­net-con­nec­ted TVs for a monthly fee. The Su­preme Court is sched­uled to hear or­al ar­gu­ments in the case on April 22.

Un­like cable and satel­lite pro­viders, Aereo doesn’t pay the TV net­works for their con­tent. The com­pany uses tiny an­ten­nas to pick up over-the-air TV sig­nals and trans­mits that video to its cus­tom­ers over the In­ter­net.

ABC, NBC, CBS, Fox, and oth­er broad­casters claim Aereo is steal­ing their con­tent, while the video site says it is only mak­ing it easi­er for con­sumers to ac­cess free TV chan­nels.

The Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion con­cluded that Aereo’s ser­vice is an “in­teg­rated sys­tem” that is steal­ing the copy­righted con­tent.

“The fact that as part of that sys­tem [Aereo] uses unique cop­ies and many in­di­vidu­al trans­mis­sions does not al­ter the con­clu­sion that it is re­trans­mit­ting broad­cast con­tent ‘to the pub­lic,’ ” the So­li­cit­or Gen­er­al’s Of­fice wrote. “Like its com­pet­it­ors, [Aereo] there­fore must ob­tain li­censes to per­form the copy­righted con­tent on which its busi­ness re­lies.”

The of­fice re­jec­ted Aereo’s ar­gu­ment that sid­ing with the broad­casters would en­danger the leg­al­ity of cloud com­put­ing and oth­er tech­niques for ac­cess­ing copy­righted con­tent re­motely.

“A con­sumer’s play­back of her own law­fully ac­quired copy of a copy­righted work to her­self will or­din­ar­ily be a non-in­fringing private per­form­ance, and it may be pro­tec­ted by fair-use prin­ciples as well,” the gov­ern­ment wrote. Aereo cus­tom­ers, by con­trast, have no right to ob­tain the TV con­tent through the ser­vice, ac­cord­ing to the fil­ing.

The So­li­cit­or Gen­er­al said the con­clu­sion that Aereo is il­leg­al “should not call in­to ques­tion the le­git­im­acy of busi­nesses that use the In­ter­net to provide new ways for con­sumers to store, hear, and view their own law­fully ac­quired cop­ies of copy­righted works.”

The U.S. Court of Ap­peals for the 2nd Cir­cuit sided with Aereo last year, and an­oth­er fed­er­al judge in Bo­ston also de­clined to shut down the com­pany. But a fed­er­al judge in Utah sided with the broad­casters this year.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
8 hours ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
8 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
8 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
8 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
9 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×