Bill to Legalize Cell-Phone Unlocking Set for House Vote

A Blackberry cell phone is seen at Fixx wireless on November 4, 2013 in Miami, Florida.
National Journal
Brendan Sasso
Feb. 25, 2014, midnight

The House is ex­pec­ted to vote on le­gis­la­tion Tues­day that would make it easi­er for people to switch cel­lu­lar pro­viders without buy­ing a new phone.

Un­der cur­rent law, people who “un­lock” their phones to switch pro­viders could face thou­sands of dol­lars in fines and — if they tried to profit from the device — even jail time.

H.R. 1123, the Un­lock­ing Con­sumer Choice and Wire­less Com­pet­i­tion Act, had broad bi­par­tis­an sup­port when it cleared the House Ju­di­ciary Com­mit­tee by a voice vote last year. But two Sil­ic­on Val­ley Demo­crats, Zoe Lof­gren and Anna Eshoo, are now mount­ing a last-minute bid to kill the le­gis­la­tion, say­ing the latest ver­sion doesn’t go far enough to pro­tect con­sumers.

Be­cause the bill is be­ing brought to the floor un­der an ex­ped­ited pro­cess, it will need a two-thirds vote to pass.

Most con­tract cell phones come “locked” to one car­ri­er. Be­cause of a de­cision by the Lib­rary of Con­gress in 2012, cus­tom­ers must ob­tain their car­ri­er’s per­mis­sion to leg­ally un­lock their phones to switch to a com­pet­it­or — even after they have com­pleted their con­tract.

The de­cision was based on the Di­git­al Mil­len­ni­um Copy­right Act (DMCA), which bans people from cir­cum­vent­ing a “tech­no­lo­gic­al meas­ure” to gain ac­cess to a copy­righted work. The lib­rary had ex­emp­ted cell-phone un­lock­ing from the DMCA’s re­stric­tions in 2006 and 2010.

The lib­rary’s 2012 de­cision to ban cell-phone un­lock­ing promp­ted an im­me­di­ate pub­lic back­lash, and more than 114,000 people signed a White House pe­ti­tion in protest.

Sup­port­ers of cell-phone un­lock­ing say it pro­motes com­pet­i­tion and that con­sumers should be able to do what they want with the devices they own.

Last year, Fed­er­al Com­mu­nic­a­tions Com­mis­sion Chair­man Tom Wheel­er pres­sured the car­ri­ers to sign on to a new un­lock­ing policy. Un­der the threat of new reg­u­la­tions, the ma­jor pro­viders all agreed to un­lock their cus­tom­ers’ phones upon re­quest.

But the new policy doesn’t pro­tect con­sumers who want to un­lock their phones on their own. People who want to tinker with their devices could still face steep fines un­der the cur­rent law.

H.R. 1123, which is au­thored by Re­pub­lic­an House Ju­di­ciary Com­mit­tee Chair­man Bob Good­latte, would over­turn the lib­rary’s de­cision and leg­al­ize cell-phone un­lock­ing.

But the latest ver­sion of Good­latte’s bill would not pro­tect people who un­lock phones in large batches. That pro­vi­sion promp­ted con­sumer-ad­vocacy groups Pub­lic Know­ledge and the Elec­tron­ic Fron­ti­er Found­a­tion to drop their sup­port. Those groups had al­ways pre­ferred le­gis­la­tion that would amend the un­der­ly­ing copy­right law in­stead of simply over­turn­ing the lib­rary’s de­cision.

Reps. Lof­gren and Eshoo began ral­ly­ing op­pos­i­tion to the bill on Monday and ac­cused Good­latte of adding the pro­vi­sion in “secret.”

“We urge a no vote on the Un­lock­ing Con­sumer Choice Act (H.R.1123) so that, in the fu­ture, we can de­vel­op con­sensus for le­gis­la­tion that provides real pro­tec­tion for con­sumers, pro­motes com­pet­i­tion, and un­locks in­nov­a­tion,” they wrote in a let­ter to oth­er law­makers.

But the bill still has sup­port from top Demo­crats in­clud­ing Rep. John Con­yers, the rank­ing mem­ber of the Ju­di­ciary Com­mit­tee, and Jer­rold Nadler, the rank­ing mem­ber of the in­tel­lec­tu­al prop­erty sub­com­mit­tee.

Aman­da Walk­er, a spokes­wo­man for Good­latte, said the bill is still ex­pec­ted to reach the floor on Tues­day des­pite the last-ditch op­pos­i­tion. 

CTIA, the lob­by­ing as­so­ci­ation for cel­lu­lar car­ri­ers, is quick to note that un­lock­ing a phone does not mean it will op­er­ate on any net­work. Tech­no­lo­gic­al bar­ri­ers could still pre­vent some cus­tom­ers from switch­ing their devices between cer­tain net­works.

What We're Following See More »
AT LEAST NOT YET
Paul Ryan Can’t Get Behind Trump
1 hours ago
THE LATEST

Paul Ryan told CNN today he's "not ready" to back Donald Trump at this time. "I'm not there right now," he said. Ryan said Trump needs to unify "all wings of the Republican Party and the conservative movement" and then run a campaign that will allow Americans to "have something that they're proud to support and proud to be a part of. And we've got a ways to go from here to there."

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Preet Bharara Learned at the Foot of Chuck Schumer
1 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

In The New Yorker, Jeffrey Toobin gives Preet Bharara, the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, the longread treatment. The scourge of corrupt New York pols, bad actors on Wall Street, and New York gang members, Bharara learned at the foot of Chuck Schumer, the famously limelight-hogging senator whom he served as a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee staff. No surprise then, that after President Obama appointed him, Bharara "brought a media-friendly approach to what has historically been a closed and guarded institution. In professional background, Bharara resembles his predecessors; in style, he’s very different. His personality reflects his dual life in New York’s political and legal firmament. A longtime prosecutor, he sometimes acts like a budding pol; his rhetoric leans more toward the wisecrack than toward the jeremiad. He expresses himself in the orderly paragraphs of a former high-school debater, but with deft comic timing and a gift for shtick."

Source:
DRUG OFFENDERS
Obama Commutes the Sentences of 58 Prisoners
1 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama has announced another round of commutations of prison sentences. Most of the 58 individuals named are incarcerated for possessions with intent to distribute controlled substances. The prisoners will be released between later this year and 2018.

STAFF PICKS
Trump Roadmapped His Candidacy in 2000
2 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The Daily Beast has unearthed a piece that Donald Trump wrote for Gear magazine in 2000, which anticipates his 2016 sales pitch quite well. "Perhaps it's time for a dealmaker who can get the leaders of Congress to the table, forge consensus, and strike compromise," he writes. Oddly, he opens by defending his reputation as a womanizer: "The hypocrites argue that a man who loves and appreciates beautiful women (and does so legally and openly) shouldn't become a national leader? Is there something wrong with appreciating beautiful women? Don't we want people in public office who show signs of life?"

Source:
‘NO MORAL OR ETHICAL GROUNDING’
Sen. Murphy: Trump Shouldn’t Get Classified Briefigs
2 hours ago
THE LATEST
×