The House is expected to vote on legislation Tuesday that would make it easier for people to switch cellular providers without buying a new phone.
Under current law, people who “unlock” their phones to switch providers could face thousands of dollars in fines and — if they tried to profit from the device — even jail time.
H.R. 1123, the Unlocking Consumer Choice and Wireless Competition Act, had broad bipartisan support when it cleared the House Judiciary Committee by a voice vote last year. But two Silicon Valley Democrats, Zoe Lofgren and Anna Eshoo, are now mounting a last-minute bid to kill the legislation, saying the latest version doesn’t go far enough to protect consumers.
Because the bill is being brought to the floor under an expedited process, it will need a two-thirds vote to pass.
Most contract cell phones come “locked” to one carrier. Because of a decision by the Library of Congress in 2012, customers must obtain their carrier’s permission to legally unlock their phones to switch to a competitor — even after they have completed their contract.
The decision was based on the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), which bans people from circumventing a “technological measure” to gain access to a copyrighted work. The library had exempted cell-phone unlocking from the DMCA’s restrictions in 2006 and 2010.
The library’s 2012 decision to ban cell-phone unlocking prompted an immediate public backlash, and more than 114,000 people signed a White House petition in protest.
Supporters of cell-phone unlocking say it promotes competition and that consumers should be able to do what they want with the devices they own.
Last year, Federal Communications Commission Chairman Tom Wheeler pressured the carriers to sign on to a new unlocking policy. Under the threat of new regulations, the major providers all agreed to unlock their customers’ phones upon request.
But the new policy doesn’t protect consumers who want to unlock their phones on their own. People who want to tinker with their devices could still face steep fines under the current law.
H.R. 1123, which is authored by Republican House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte, would overturn the library’s decision and legalize cell-phone unlocking.
But the latest version of Goodlatte’s bill would not protect people who unlock phones in large batches. That provision prompted consumer-advocacy groups Public Knowledge and the Electronic Frontier Foundation to drop their support. Those groups had always preferred legislation that would amend the underlying copyright law instead of simply overturning the library’s decision.
Reps. Lofgren and Eshoo began rallying opposition to the bill on Monday and accused Goodlatte of adding the provision in “secret.”
“We urge a no vote on the Unlocking Consumer Choice Act (H.R.1123) so that, in the future, we can develop consensus for legislation that provides real protection for consumers, promotes competition, and unlocks innovation,” they wrote in a letter to other lawmakers.
But the bill still has support from top Democrats including Rep. John Conyers, the ranking member of the Judiciary Committee, and Jerrold Nadler, the ranking member of the intellectual property subcommittee.
Amanda Walker, a spokeswoman for Goodlatte, said the bill is still expected to reach the floor on Tuesday despite the last-ditch opposition.
CTIA, the lobbying association for cellular carriers, is quick to note that unlocking a phone does not mean it will operate on any network. Technological barriers could still prevent some customers from switching their devices between certain networks.
What We're Following See More »
Paul Ryan told CNN today he's "not ready" to back Donald Trump at this time. "I'm not there right now," he said. Ryan said Trump needs to unify "all wings of the Republican Party and the conservative movement" and then run a campaign that will allow Americans to "have something that they're proud to support and proud to be a part of. And we've got a ways to go from here to there."
In The New Yorker, Jeffrey Toobin gives Preet Bharara, the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, the longread treatment. The scourge of corrupt New York pols, bad actors on Wall Street, and New York gang members, Bharara learned at the foot of Chuck Schumer, the famously limelight-hogging senator whom he served as a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee staff. No surprise then, that after President Obama appointed him, Bharara "brought a media-friendly approach to what has historically been a closed and guarded institution. In professional background, Bharara resembles his predecessors; in style, he’s very different. His personality reflects his dual life in New York’s political and legal firmament. A longtime prosecutor, he sometimes acts like a budding pol; his rhetoric leans more toward the wisecrack than toward the jeremiad. He expresses himself in the orderly paragraphs of a former high-school debater, but with deft comic timing and a gift for shtick."
President Obama has announced another round of commutations of prison sentences. Most of the 58 individuals named are incarcerated for possessions with intent to distribute controlled substances. The prisoners will be released between later this year and 2018.
The Daily Beast has unearthed a piece that Donald Trump wrote for Gear magazine in 2000, which anticipates his 2016 sales pitch quite well. "Perhaps it's time for a dealmaker who can get the leaders of Congress to the table, forge consensus, and strike compromise," he writes. Oddly, he opens by defending his reputation as a womanizer: "The hypocrites argue that a man who loves and appreciates beautiful women (and does so legally and openly) shouldn't become a national leader? Is there something wrong with appreciating beautiful women? Don't we want people in public office who show signs of life?"