The House Transportation Committee voted unanimously Tuesday to advance legislation that would ban cell-phone calls on planes. The bill is a sharp rebuke of a proposal by the Federal Communications Commission to lift its current prohibition on in-flight calls.
“As anyone who flies knows, airplane cabins are noisy, crowded, and confined,” said Rep. Bill Shuster, the committee chairman and author of the bill. “Subjecting passengers to potentially multiple, loud phone conversations in such close quarters would obviously diminish the comfort of any flight. It is just plain common sense that while on a plane with so many other people it will be in everyone’s best interest to keep phone calls out of the cabin.”
Shuster argued that it’s fine to allow passengers to text and browse the Web on their phones, but he’s opposed to calls that might disturb others.
Rep. Nick Rahall, the top Democrat on the committee, argued that in-flight phone use is a serious safety and comfort issue. He said that unlike an Amtrak train, it’s not feasible to have a “quiet car” on a plane where people can avoid noisy conversations. Democratic Rep. Grace Napolitano noted she frequently has to fly back and forth to her district in California and said no one should be “bombarded with information you don’t want to know.”
The bill, H.R. 3676, would direct the Transportation Department to enact new regulations banning in-flight calls except for the flight crew or law-enforcement officers. Shuster argued that it’s not the FCC’s job to regulate calls on planes.
The FCC has a long-standing ban on in-flight calls based on technical concerns about interference with ground networks. In November, FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler announced he would move ahead with a proposal to lift the ban, citing new technologies that can avoid the interference problems.
But Wheeler, who had just taken office a few weeks earlier, faced a swift public blowback from people afraid of getting stuck in a small space near an obnoxious conversation.
Wheeler clarified that he personally didn’t want to have a phone call near him on a plane, but he argued that if the technical basis for the FCC’s rules is gone, the agency should lift the ban. In December, the FCC voted 3-2 along party lines to begin accepting public comments on the proposal. But even Democratic Commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel, who voted to move ahead, expressed concern about the plan and indicated she may not support any final action to allow in-flight calls.
Ahead of the FCC vote, Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx said his department would explore enacting its own rules against in-flight calls.
Shuster’s bill now moves to the full House for consideration.
Republican Sen. Lamar Alexander has introduced similar legislation in the upper chamber, but a spokesman for the Senate Commerce Committee did not comment on whether the panel plans to take up the bill.
What We're Following See More »
Concerned that she's become too divisive, "Democrats on Capitol Hill are discussing whether Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz should step down as Democratic National Committee (DNC) chairwoman before the party’s national convention in July. ... Wasserman Schultz has had an increasingly acrimonious relationship with the party’s other presidential candidate, Bernie Sanders, and his supporters, who argue she has tilted the scales in Clinton’s favor." The money quote, from a Democratic senator who backs Clinton: “There have been a lot of meetings over the past 48 hours about what color plate do we deliver Debbie Wasserman Schultz’s head on." Meanwhile, Newsweek takes a look at why no one seems to like Wasserman Schultz.
"The U.S. House of Representatives plans to vote Wednesday on a Republican bill that would block the District of Columbia from spending locally raised tax revenue without congressional approval, prompting President Obama to pledge to veto it. In issuing the veto threat on Tuesday, the Obama White House made one of the strongest statements to date in support of the District’s attempt to win financial independence from Congress."
When it comes to name-calling among America's upper echelon of politicians, there may be perhaps no greater spat than the one currently going on between Sen. Elizabeth Warren and Donald Trump. While receiving an award Tuesday night, she continued a months-long feud with the presumptive GOP presidential nominee. Calling him a "small, insecure moneygrubber" who probably doesn't know three things about Dodd-Frank, she said he "will NEVER be president of the United States," according to her prepared remarks."We don't know what Trump pays in taxes because he is the first presidential nominee in 40 years to refuse to disclose his tax returns. Maybe he’s just a lousy businessman who doesn’t want you to find out that he’s worth a lot less money than he claims." It follows a long-line of Warren attacks over Twitter, Facebook and in interviews that Trump is a sexist, racist, narcissistic loser. In reply, Trump has called Warren either "goofy" or "the Indian"—referring to her controversial assertion of her Native American heritage.
Citing the unpredictable nature of this primary season and the possible leverage they could bring at the convention, John Kasich is hanging onto his 161 delegates. "Kasich sent personal letters Monday to Republican officials in the 16 states and the District of Columbia where he won delegates, requesting that they stay bound to him in accordance with party rules."
Bernie Sanders "signed a letter Tuesday morning requesting a full and complete check and recanvass of the election results in Kentucky ... where he trails Hillary Clinton by less than one-half of 1 percent of the vote. The Sanders campaign said it has asked the Kentucky secretary of state to have election officials review electronic voting machines and absentee ballots from last week's primary in each of the state's 120 counties.