A Google Glass app that claims it can scan strangers’ faces and pull up information about them online is drawing scrutiny from Capitol Hill.
Democratic Sen. Al Franken sent a letter Wednesday urging the maker of the NameTag app to delay its release. Franken demanded more information about how the app will work and urged the company to implement tougher privacy safeguards.
“Your company has a duty to act as a responsible corporate citizen in deploying this technology, which must be done in a manner that respects and protects individual privacy,” wrote Franken, the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee’s Privacy, Technology, and the Law Subcommittee.
The makers of NameTag say it can use the Google Glass camera to scan people’s faces and then look for matches online, including on dating sites like OkCupid and Match. Franken expressed alarm that the app could allow users to identify a stranger’s name, photos, relationship status, and other private information without their consent or knowledge.
Google, however, bans the use of facial-recognition technology on Glass — its computerized eyewear that is still in limited release.
“Our policy remains as it did when we publicly banned facial-recognition apps in June 2013,” Google spokeswoman Sam Smith said. “This app would not be available for distribution on Glass.”
But Franken expressed concern that the app could work if a Glass device is “jailbroken” — a modification that could allow users to bypass Google’s limitations on the device.
FacialNetwork.com, which makes the app, did not respond to a request for comment, but in the company’s promotional materials, it argues that the app will make the world a “much more connected place.”
“It’s much easier to meet interesting new people when we can simply look at someone, see their Facebook, review their LinkedIn page, or maybe even see their dating-site profile. Often we were interacting with people blindly or not interacting at all. NameTag on Google Glass can change all that,” Kevin Alan Tussy, the app’s creator, said in a statement last month.
At the urging of Franken, the National Telecommunications and Information Administration, a Commerce Department agency, will begin its study of the privacy risks of facial recognition technology at a meeting Thursday.
What We're Following See More »
Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”
“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.