A Target executive testified on Tuesday that the company was oblivious that hackers were stealing its customers’ information until the government informed the company last month.
“Despite the significant investment and multiple layers of detection that we had within our systems, we did not [detect the breach],” John Mulligan, Target’s executive vice president and chief financial officer, said during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing.
The Justice Department informed Target of suspicious activity involving its customers’ credit and debit cards on Dec. 12 last year. The company wasn’t able to rid its systems of the computer virus until Dec. 18, Mulligan said.
The breach affected as many as 110 million people who shopped at Target between Nov. 27 and Dec. 18.
Mulligan testified that the hackers inserted a virus into the registers in Target stores. The virus, which went undetected by the company’s virus-protection programs, captured payment information before it could be encrypted in Target’s system.
In addition to credit- and debit-card numbers, the hackers also captured the names, mailing addresses, phone numbers, and email addresses of millions of customers. In some cases, the hackers were even able to obtain customers’ PIN numbers, Mulligan said.
“I want to say how deeply sorry we are for the impact this incident has had on our guests — your constituents,” Mulligan said.
“We know this breach has shaken their confidence in Target, and we are determined to work very hard to earn it back.”
He argued that if credit- and debit-card companies had used “Chip and PIN” technology, it would have protected the customer information.
Michael Kingston, senior vice president and chief information officer at Neiman Marcus, said his company realized that hackers had invaded its system on Jan. 2, and was able to get rid of the virus by Jan. 10. The breach may have affected about 1 million payment cards, Kingston said.
Several Democrats, including Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy, have introduced bills that would empower the government to fine companies that fail to implement adequate privacy and security safeguards.
Sen. Charles Grassley, the ranking Republican on the Judiciary Committee, argued that legislation should focus only on voluntary guidelines.
“In a world of crafty criminals, it seems to me that one-size-fits-all approach won’t work, or at least won’t work for everybody,” Grassley said. “Instead, let’s see how the government can partner with private business to strengthen data security.”
But Democrats emphasized the importance of mandatory security rules.
“Rights are not real unless they are enforceable,” said Sen. Richard Blumenthal, of Connecticut.
What We're Following See More »
"A State Department audit has faulted Hillary Clinton and previous secretaries of state for poorly managing email and other computer information and slowly responding to new cybersecurity risks. ... It cites 'longstanding, systemic weaknesses' related to communications. These started before Clinton's appointment as secretary of state, but her failures were singled out as more serious."
Donald Trump "was on course to win more than three-quarters of the vote in Washington's primary" last night. Ted Cruz's defunct candidacy still pulled about 10 percent. "Cruz dropped out of the race on May 3, but won 40 of the state's 41 delegates up for grabs at last weekend's state GOP convention."
"What started as a calm protest outside Donald Trump’s rally Tuesday erupted into fiery violence as protesters jumped on police cars, smashed windows and fought with Trump supporters and police. Police faced such an angry crowd that they called in reinforcements from around the state, seeking to double their numbers to counter the protesters, whose numbers swelled beyond 600." Protesters threw rocks and bottles at police, who broke up several fights.
Concerned that she's become too divisive, "Democrats on Capitol Hill are discussing whether Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz should step down as Democratic National Committee (DNC) chairwoman before the party’s national convention in July. ... Wasserman Schultz has had an increasingly acrimonious relationship with the party’s other presidential candidate, Bernie Sanders, and his supporters, who argue she has tilted the scales in Clinton’s favor." The money quote, from a Democratic senator who backs Clinton: “There have been a lot of meetings over the past 48 hours about what color plate do we deliver Debbie Wasserman Schultz’s head on." Meanwhile, Newsweek takes a look at why no one seems to like Wasserman Schultz.
"The U.S. House of Representatives plans to vote Wednesday on a Republican bill that would block the District of Columbia from spending locally raised tax revenue without congressional approval, prompting President Obama to pledge to veto it. In issuing the veto threat on Tuesday, the Obama White House made one of the strongest statements to date in support of the District’s attempt to win financial independence from Congress."