In a few years, the telephone may be as out of date as the telegraph. Instead, all calls will go over high-speed Internet networks.
But phone companies are subject to a slew of government regulations intended to ensure reliability, promote competition, and expand access. Which of those regulations should apply to the networks of the future and which should be left behind?
That’s the question that the Federal Communications Commission is going to try to answer. The agency will vote Thursday to move ahead with a set of trials to study how it should update its regulations to apply in the transition to Internet Protocol, or IP, networks.
The issue may seem arcane, but if grandma tries to call 911 on her new Internet phone and the call doesn’t go through, people will notice.
According to an agency spokesman, the FCC will declare four core values for the transition: public safety, universal access, consumer protection, and competition.
“For the last hundred years with the telephone network, we’ve had a set of rules, a set of operating guidelines, a set of ‘this is how I as a consumer can expect to interface with the network,’ ” FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler said earlier this week at State of the Net, an Internet policy conference in Washington.
“As we go to an all-IP network, the technology has changed, but the basic compact concepts have not.”
Many Internet calling services like Skype and Vonage already exist. Broadband Internet networks can carry traffic more efficiently, and the telecommunications giants are tired of maintaining their old networks of copper lines and outdated switches.
The FCC’s planned trials will not be technical experiments.
“We do not need trials to figure how to build IP networks. They work. We know how to do that,” Wheeler said. “What we do need to do is to understand what happens when that’s the network — that’s everything we’re relying on.”
Companies that want to participate in the FCC’s experiments will have to apply by Feb. 20. The agency will make decisions about the locations of the trials in May. Once the trials are underway, the FCC will begin collecting data and studying how to adjust its regulations.
Consumer advocacy groups are urging the FCC to ensure that it applies core regulatory safeguards to the networks of the future.
“We cannot, and should not, demand that companies keep the same copper-based technologies forever. But we also should not assume that the new world will automatically be just as good or better. It can easily be a step backward, as well as a step forward,” Jodie Griffin and Harold Feld, lawyers for the nonprofit group Public Knowledge, wrote in a white paper last year.
“Deliberate policy choices were responsible for creating the national 911 system or making sure that everyone had affordable phone service. If we make a different set of choices now, we could easily leave these and other things we associate with the phone system behind.”
But Republicans see the FCC’s proceeding as an opportunity to clear out some of the regulatory underbrush that has accumulated over the last 100 years and is holding back businesses.
Just a few minutes after Wheeler spoke at the Internet conference this week, Sen. John Thune, the top Republican on the Senate Commerce Committee, which oversees the FCC, took the stage to offer his own view of how the agency should treat the phones of the future.
“I honestly do not understand how anyone believes that laws designed for Ma Bell in the 1930s are appropriate for the Internet today,” he said. “While there are fundamental goals that need to be preserved — such as universal service and public safety — as policymakers, we need to be open-minded about how to achieve those goals in the future without being bound by the strictures of the past.”
He pointed to seemingly needless FCC regulations, such as requiring phone companies to label, track, and report the exact location (down to the shelf) of pieces of equipment.
Thune argued that the accumulated burdens of such rules “represent a significant economic drag that diverts limited resources to lawyers and regulators and away from providing new products and services to consumers.”
It could be more than a year before the FCC makes any final decisions about how to regulate the new networks, but the consequences could shape how we communicate for decades to come.
What We're Following See More »
"It is with humility, determination, and boundless confidence in America’s promise that I accept your nomination for president," said Hillary Clinton in becoming the first woman to accept a nomination for president from a major party. Clinton gave a wide-ranging address, both criticizing Donald Trump and speaking of what she has done in the past and hopes to do in the future. "He's taken the Republican party a long way, from morning in America to midnight in America," Clinton said of Trump. However, most of her speech focused instead on the work she has done and the work she hopes to do as president. "I will be a president of Democrats, Republicans, and Independents. For the struggling, the striving, the successful," she said. "For those who vote for me and for those who don't. For all Americans together."
Supporters of Bernie Sanders promised to walk out, turn their backs, or disrupt Hillary Clinton's speech tonight, and they made good immediately, with an outburst almost as soon as Clinton began her speech. But her supporters, armed with a handy counter-chant cheat sheet distributed by the campaign, immediately began drowning them out with chants of "Hillary, Hillary!"
If a new poll is to be believed, Hillary Clinton has a big lead in the all-important swing state of Pennsylvania. A new Suffolk University survey shows her ahead of Donald Trump, 50%-41%. In a four-way race, she maintains her nine-point lead, 46%-37%. "Pennsylvania has voted Democratic in the past six presidential elections, going back to Bill Clinton’s first win in 1992. Yet it is a rust belt state that could be in play, as indicated by recent general-election polling showing a close race."
Wednesday was the third night in a row that the Democratic convention enjoyed a ratings win over the Republican convention last week. Which might have prompted a fundraising email from Donald Trump exhorting supporters not to watch. "Unless you want to be lied to, belittled, and attacked for your beliefs, don't watch Hillary's DNC speech tonight," the email read. "Instead, help Donald Trump hold her accountable, call out her lies and fight back against her nasty attacks."
Catholics who attend mass at least weekly have increased their support of the Democratic nominee by 22 points, relative to 2012, when devout Catholics backed Mitt Romney. Meanwhile, a Morning Consult poll shows that those voters with advanced degrees prefer Hillary Clinton, 51%-34%. Which, we suppose, makes the ideal Clinton voter a Catholic with a PhD in divinity.