Democrat: Obama’s Spying Compromise Threatens Millions

Jay Rockefeller doesn’t trust the private sector to store phone data.

WASHINGTON, DC - AUGUST 03: Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee Chairman Jay Rockefeller (D-WV) answers reporters questions during a news conference about funding for the Federal Aviation Administration at the U.S. Capitol August 3, 2011 in Washington, DC. Congressional Democrats blamed Republicans in the House of Representatives for refusing to pass a 'clean' bill to fund the FAA, leaving 4,000 agency employees out of work and relying on airport safety inspectors to continue working without pay. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
National Journal
Brendan Sasso
Jan. 29, 2014, 7:34 a.m.

For­cing the Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Agency to give up con­trol over its massive data­base of phone re­cords would harm na­tion­al se­cur­ity and en­danger the pri­vacy of mil­lions of Amer­ic­ans, Demo­crat­ic Sen. Jay Rock­e­feller said Wed­nes­day.

“While the pres­id­ent has made it clear that he un­der­stands our in­tel­li­gence need for this data, I do not be­lieve we can come up with a bet­ter al­tern­at­ive,” Rock­e­feller said at a Sen­ate In­tel­li­gence Com­mit­tee hear­ing.

“Here’s why: Prac­tic­ally, we do not have the tech­nic­al ca­pa­city to do so. And, cer­tainly, it is im­possible to do so without the pos­sib­il­ity of massive mis­takes or cata­stroph­ic pri­vacy vi­ol­a­tions.”

One of the most con­tro­ver­sial rev­el­a­tions from the leaks by Ed­ward Snowden is that the NSA col­lects re­cords — such as phone num­bers, call times, and call dur­a­tions — on vir­tu­ally all U.S. calls. In an at­tempt to ease the grow­ing out­rage over NSA sur­veil­lance, Pres­id­ent Obama an­nounced earli­er this month that he asked At­tor­ney Gen­er­al Eric Hold­er and top In­tel­li­gence of­fi­cials to come up with a plan to give up con­trol of the phone data­base.

It’s un­clear how ex­actly the ad­min­is­tra­tion plans to con­tin­ue min­ing the phone re­cords while no longer con­trolling the data­base. One pos­sib­il­ity is that a new private en­tity will hold the re­cords and then give the NSA ac­cess to it. An­oth­er pro­pos­al would be to re­quire the phone com­pan­ies to main­tain the re­cords on be­half of the gov­ern­ment.

But Rock­e­feller said it is an “im­possib­il­ity” to cre­ate a new en­tity that could co­ordin­ate and handle bil­lions of sens­it­ive phone re­cords safely. He also noted that the phone com­pan­ies have no in­terest in be­com­ing “agents” of the gov­ern­ment.

“The tele­com pro­viders them­selves do not want to do this, and for good reas­on,” he said. “Tele­com com­pan­ies do not take an oath — they are neither coun­terter­ror­ism agen­cies nor pri­vacy-pro­tec­tion or­gan­iz­a­tions. They are busi­nesses, and they are fo­cused on re­ward­ing their share­hold­ers, not pro­tect­ing pri­vacy or na­tion­al se­cur­ity.”

Rock­e­feller, the chair­man of the Sen­ate Com­merce Com­mit­tee, which over­sees the tele­com­mu­nic­a­tions in­dustry, said he has dealt with the phone com­pan­ies enough to know not to trust them.

“I have served on the Com­merce Com­mit­tee for 30 years and know that tele­phone com­pan­ies some­times make empty prom­ises about con­sumer pro­tec­tion and trans­par­ency,” he said. “Cor­por­a­tions core profit motives can, and some­times have, trumped their hold­ing to their own pub­lic com­mit­ments.”

The sen­at­or wor­ried that keep­ing the sens­it­ive re­cords in the private sec­tor could leave them vul­ner­able to hack­ers. He ar­gued that the re­cent data breach at Tar­get shows that only the gov­ern­ment can be trus­ted with pro­tect­ing such a massive trove of private data.

Rock­e­feller also ar­gued that the NSA is sub­ject to “strin­gent” audits and over­sight to en­sure that ana­lysts don’t ab­use their power to ac­cess private in­form­a­tion without prop­er au­thor­iz­a­tion. The private sec­tor has no such pro­tec­tions, he said.

“I can’t tell you how strongly I feel about this,” Rock­e­feller em­phas­ized.

Sen. Di­anne Fein­stein, the chair­wo­man of the Sen­ate In­tel­li­gence Com­mit­tee, noted Rock­e­feller’s ex­tens­ive ex­per­i­ence deal­ing with tele­com­mu­nic­a­tions is­sues on the Com­merce Com­mit­tee.

“In my view, he knows what he’s talk­ing about,” she said.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
2 hours ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
2 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
2 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
2 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
3 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×