When a court ruling struck down down federal net-neutrality regulations, it was widely seen as horrible news for Netflix, the type of high-bandwidth website that service providers such as Comcast or Verizon would likely target for millions of dollars worth of fees.
Instead, it’s Netflix that is firing the first shot.
CEO Reed Hastings on Wednesday warned providers that it will rally its customers against them should they threaten to charge the site more or slow down its traffic.
Until the ruling last week by the D.C. Circuit Court, Internet providers were legally required to treat all traffic equally, neither prioritizing traffic from one website or another nor charging websites extra for using lots of bandwidth. But now that those “Open Internet” rules have been thrown out, many saw Netflix as a likely candidate for new charges. Not only is the streaming website a major hog of Internet road space, its content also competes directly with Internet service providers’ cable offerings.
But Netflix says it is ready.
“Were this draconian scenario to unfold with some [Internet service providers], we would vigorously protest and encourage our members to demand the open Internet they are paying their ISP to deliver,” Hastings wrote in the note on Wednesday, which accompanied the company’s quarterly earnings report.
With a presence in one in four U.S. households, Netflix is a considerable force, but Hastings says he doesn’t expect to have to resort to a public battle with the Internet providers.
“ISPs are generally aware of the broad public support for net neutrality and don’t want to galvanize government action,” he wrote.
Broadband Internet is an extremely profitable business, Hastings noted, and the providers want to ensure their customers have access to high-quality video sites. He also said he hopes the providers will adhere to a “meaningful voluntary code of conduct,” but warned that if they start degrading Internet traffic, Netflix will lobby for tougher regulation.
What We're Following See More »
Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”
“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.