These people are all victims of the modern epidemic known as “texting while walking.”
The rise of texting while walking and its associated perils have been well documented by the Pew Research Center, which has posted an analysis of the situation based on a survey from mid-2012. The findings? Fifty-three percent of all adult mobile phone owners have been either on the giving or receiving end of a “distracted walking encounter.” Not to be confused with an “illicit encounter” or a “missed connection,” these behaviors are most prevalent amongst the young (in particular ages 18-24). Those with a smartphone are especially likely to engage in said behavior (32 percent of users compared with 14 percent of non-smartphone owners), according to the study.
Now some towns are going so far as to ban the practice. In Fort Lee, N.J., pedestrians can be fined $85 for the sin of texting while walking, and in New York City, lawmakers have sought to implement a $100 fine. Enforcement, though, is another issue.
Numerous victims have been moved to speak out on the subject, as did one woman in South Bend, Ind., who recently fell into a river while walking. “I couldn’t let pride stand in my way of warning other people to not drive and text or walk and text,” she said. “It can be dangerous.”
And The Times is on it. “Let’s stop acting like hollowed-out zombies, with BlackBerrys and iPhones replacing eye contact, handshakes and face-to-face conversations,” filmmaker Casey Neistat wrote recently in The New York Times‘ op-ed pages. “It’s time to live once again in the present and simply be where we are.”
All Zen advice aside, the best reason not to text and walk is one that’s best relayed by statistics. The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission says 1,152 pedestrians were treated in emergency rooms in 2011 upon being injured while using a cell phone or other electronic device.
Pew has distilled the hazards in a chart. Behold, the percentage of cell-phone owners in each age bracket who have bumped into something or been bumped into by others who were distracted by their phones:
- 1 High Court Vacancy Spells Trouble for Congress
- 2 Why Four Justices Were Against the Supreme Court’s Huge Gay-Marriage Decision
- 3 The Winners and Losers From the South Carolina Republican Debate
- 4 Can Obama Unilaterally Raise the Minimum Wage?
- 5 FBI’s Facial-Recognition Technology Has Achieved ‘Full Operational Capability’
What We're Following See More »
Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”
“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.