OPINION

New Asperger’s Rule: ‘What Does This Mean for My Son?’

Dec. 4, 2012, 6:33 a.m.

Tim­ing is everything. Less than three years after my son was dia­gnosed with As­per­ger’s syn­drome — and just three days after I pub­lished a magazine art­icle about his con­di­tion — the Amer­ic­an Psy­chi­at­ric As­so­ci­ation dropped As­pies from the psy­chi­at­rist’s “bible.”

My re­ac­tion was typ­ic­al: What does this mean for my boy? The news rolled in­to my in­box along with thou­sands of e-mails from As­pies and and As­pie fam­il­ies. Some read­ers re­cog­nized them­selves or a loved one in my son Tyler. Oth­er read­ers, in­clud­ing many not touched by aut­ism, sym­path­ized with my pa­ternal battle to strike a work-life bal­ance. Many saw them­selves in the tend­ency to fit my beau­ti­ful round peg in a square hole.

A few read­ers cited the APA de­cision, which will lump As­per­ger’s and sim­il­ar so­cial-in­ter­ac­tion is­sues un­der the aut­ism-spec­trum um­brella, and asked me, “What does this mean for my child?” The an­swer is I don’t know. The ini­tial ex­plan­a­tions are un­sat­is­fact­ory. This from CBS News:

“The aim is not to ex­pand the num­ber of people dia­gnosed with men­tal ill­ness, but to en­sure that af­fected chil­dren and adults are more ac­cur­ately dia­gnosed so they can get the most ap­pro­pri­ate treat­ment, said Dr. Dav­id Kup­fer, who chaired the task force in charge of re­vis­ing the manu­al, and is a psy­chi­atry pro­fess­or at the Uni­versity of Pitt­s­burgh.

“One of the most hotly ar­gued top­ics ahead of the re­vi­sions was how to define the vari­ous ranges of aut­ism. Some ad­voc­ates op­posed the idea of drop­ping the spe­cif­ic dia­gnos­is for As­per­ger’s. People with that dis­order of­ten have high in­tel­li­gence and vast know­ledge on nar­row sub­jects but lack so­cial skills.

Some who have the con­di­tion em­brace their quirk­i­ness and vow to con­tin­ue to use the la­bel. And some As­per­ger’s fam­il­ies op­posed any change, fear­ing their kids would lose a dia­gnos­is and no longer be eli­gible for spe­cial ser­vices.”

In or­der to bond with my son and help him put his so­cial-skills classes to use, Tyler and I traveled to U.S. his­tor­ic­al sites and vis­ited with two former pres­id­ents (Bill Clin­ton and George W. Bush). The pro­ject helped me see Tyler through the for­giv­ing eyes of oth­ers. If they ac­cept his quirk­i­ness — and they do — I should em­brace it. And I have.

Re­ac­tion to Tyler’s jour­ney has taught me that my fam­ily is not alone — we are part of a massive com­munity of As­pie fam­il­ies who are get­ting sup­port denied to gen­er­a­tions past. Still, I ache for people who don’t have the time and re­sources, even today, to sup­port their chil­dren. I will be watch­ing how in­sur­ance com­pan­ies, the gov­ern­ment, and health care pro­viders re­spond to the APA de­cision. This must not be a step back for As­pies. More from CBS News:

Lori Sherry, pres­id­ent of the As­per­ger Syn­drome Edu­ca­tion Net­work, told The New York Times in March, “Our fear is that we are go­ing to take a big step back­ward. If clini­cians say, ‘These kids don’t fit the cri­ter­ia for an aut­ism-spec­trum dia­gnos­is,’ they are not go­ing to get the sup­ports and ser­vices they need, and they’re go­ing to ex­per­i­ence fail­ure.”

But the re­vi­sion will not af­fect their edu­ca­tion ser­vices, ex­perts say.

The new manu­al adds the term “aut­ism-spec­trum dis­order,” which already is used by many ex­perts in the field. As­per­ger’s will be dropped and in­cor­por­ated un­der that um­brella dia­gnos­is, which will also in­clude kids with severe aut­ism, who of­ten don’t talk or in­ter­act, as well as those with milder forms.

Kelli Gib­son of Battle Creek, Mich., who has four sons with vari­ous forms of aut­ism, said Sat­urday she wel­comes the change. Her boys all had dif­fer­ent la­bels in the old dia­gnost­ic manu­al, in­clud­ing a 14-year-old with As­per­ger’s.

“To give it sep­ar­ate names nev­er made sense to me,” Gib­son said. “To me, my chil­dren all had aut­ism.”

What We're Following See More »
HAD BEEN A CAREER EMPLOYEE THERE
DoD IG Probing Shanahan for Bias in Favor of Boeing
9 hours ago
THE LATEST

"The Department of Defense’s Inspector General confirmed Wednesday that it has launched an investigation into allegations that Acting Secretary of Defense Patrick Shanahan violated ethics rules by promoting his former employer, Boeing, during his time at the DoD."

Source:
SAYS NO MORE HIKES THIS YEAR
Fed Holds Tight on Rates
11 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"The Federal Reserve decided Wednesday to hold interest rates steady and indicated that no more hikes will be coming this year. In a unanimous move that coincides with market expectations and demands, the central bank’s policymaking Federal Open Market Committee took a sharp dovish turn from policy projections just three months earlier. After the announcement, 10-year Treasury yields fell to their lowest level in a year."

Source:
NO INDICTMENTS SINCE JANUARY
Mueller's Team Down to 10 Lawyers
16 hours ago
THE LATEST

"Mueller’s team, once filled with 17 lawyers, will soon be down to 10. The special counsel’s office confirmed in recent days that Zainab Ahmad’s detail has ended, and Andrew Weissmann will soon be leaving for the private sector. No one has been charged by the special counsel since longtime Trump adviser Roger Stone was indicted in January for allegedly lying to Congress."

Source:
HE PLANNED TO LEAVE MID-MARCH
Rosenstein Not Leaving DOJ Yet
1 days ago
THE LATEST
MANAFORT STEERED HIM WORK IN UKRAINE
Prosecutors Weighing Whether to Charge Greg Craig
2 days ago
THE LATEST

A long-running federal investigation into former Obama White House counsel Gregory Craig "is reaching a critical stage, presenting the Justice Department with a decision about whether to charge a prominent Democrat as part of a more aggressive crackdown on illegal foreign lobbying." Federal prosecutors in New York have transferred the case to Washington. ... The investigation centers on whether Mr. Craig should have disclosed work he did in 2012 — while he was a partner at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom — on behalf of the Russia-aligned government of Viktor F. Yanukovych, then the president of Ukraine. The work was steered to Mr. Craig by Paul Manafort."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login