What it Really Means to ‘Close the GOP Tech Gap’

Two obstacles the Republican National Committee must overcome that it didn’t anticipate in its election post-mortem

120829 - Tampa, FL - Karl Rove being interviewed on the floor of the RNC.
©2012 Liz Lynch
May 3, 2013, 3:01 a.m.

Whomever the Re­pub­lic­an Na­tion­al Com­mit­tee taps to fill its top tech post has an un­en­vi­able job to do.

The race has come down to three people. They all work for big Sil­ic­on Val­ley com­pan­ies nom­in­ally, but all un­mis­tak­ably hail from the Wash­ing­ton es­tab­lish­ment. Face­book’s Katie Har­bath, who pre­vi­ously served as the Na­tion­al Re­pub­lic­an Sen­at­ori­al Com­mit­tee’s chief di­git­al strategist, is cur­rently in the lead. The re­main­ing two can­did­ates are Twit­ter’s Mindy Finn and Google’s Rob Sa­liter­man. Each of the lat­ter has worked for former Pres­id­ent George W. Bush at vari­ous points.

Who con­trols the data con­trols the can­did­ates; who con­trols the can­did­ates con­trols the party.

The win­ner of this con­test is go­ing to in­her­it some sticky chal­lenges. To de­scribe the prob­lem simply as a mat­ter of “clos­ing the tech gap” between Demo­crats and Re­pub­lic­ans over­sim­pli­fies the tac­tic­al obstacles that stand in the RNC’s way. If the GOP really wants to catch up, it’ll have to settle two spe­cif­ic in­tern­al de­bates: one about data own­er­ship and an­oth­er about data per­mis­sions.

Here’s why data own­er­ship is a big deal. To para­phrase the geo­graph­er Halford Mac­kinder: Who con­trols the data con­trols the can­did­ates; who con­trols the can­did­ates con­trols the party. In­deed, in re­cent weeks re­ports have sur­faced of a com­pet­i­tion between Karl Rove, the wealthy Koch broth­ers and oth­ers to see who can build the most dom­in­ant data plat­form. (Just this week, the com­mit­tee inked a part­ner­ship with a Rove-af­fil­i­ated firm, Liberty Works. Us­ing RNC data, Liberty Works will build a data­base plat­form that will be man­aged by a third en­tity, Data Trust.)

Data own­er­ship im­plies the abil­ity to as­sert your own rules gov­ern­ing who can see, use and re­dis­trib­ute what’s con­tained in the data­base. Be­cause the RNC’s goal is the cent­ral­iz­a­tion of all Re­pub­lic­an data, this could pose a prob­lem for, say, rival Re­pub­lic­ans fa­cing off in a primary con­test.

“What if the com­mit­tee (prefers) a cer­tain can­did­ate? Or who­ever owns this data is able to rent the data or to sell the data?” said Vin­cent Har­ris, the Texas-based strategist who ran di­git­al for Newt Gin­grich and Rick Perry. “The idea is cer­tainly ex­cit­ing, but clar­ity would be good con­cern­ing fair use of the data and en­sur­ing that con­ser­vat­ives, po­ten­tial primary chal­lengers, will have ac­cess. Of­ten it’s the more-con­ser­vat­ive cam­paigns, the ones many es­tab­lish­ment folks don’t al­ways like, that have the en­ergy on their side. Will their own in­bound data po­ten­tially be used down the line against them?”

Skep­ti­cism of the RNC’s new di­git­al ini­ti­at­ive isn’t unique to party elites; it’s also spread to the rank and file, where state-level or­gan­izers have com­plained that the party com­mit­tee’s ex­ist­ing tools don’t serve their needs. As one lower-level West Coast GOP of­fi­cial said, “it’s pretty de­plor­able.”

“Phone num­bers were rare, and there were no email ad­dresses,” the of­fi­cial said of his at­tempt to down­load some 50,000 RNC files earli­er this year from GOP Data Cen­ter, the tool the com­mit­tee makes avail­able for state and loc­al races. RNC spokes­per­son Kirsten Kukowski ac­know­ledged that Data Cen­ter “doesn’t in­clude all the data points we have.” But the com­mit­tee’s new data plat­form man­aged by Data Trust aims to ad­dress some of that. It’ll bring to­geth­er voter lists from vari­ous Re­pub­lic­an com­mit­tees and ex­tern­al or­gan­iz­a­tions, as well as al­low ap­proved groups to build onto the plat­form as they see fit.

Wheth­er that means field or­gan­izers will be able to up­date data re­cords them­selves is still un­clear. Since grass­roots staff are of­ten the ones who first find out when a voter’s ad­dress or con­tact in­form­a­tion has changed, giv­ing those or­gan­izers the per­mis­sion to make ed­its could have im­port­ant rami­fic­a­tions for fu­ture races, said long­time GOP strategist Mi­chael Turk.

“You can ac­tu­ally bring all of the changes those people make in­to the data­base as es­sen­tially metadata,” said Turk, “and then that data gets run through a fil­ter to either ap­prove or dis­ap­prove, lit­er­ally on a per-re­cord basis, its in­clu­sion in the lar­ger body of data.”

Un­til that hap­pens, lower-level Re­pub­lic­ans may still find them­selves be­ing driv­en to off-the-shelf data vendors, po­ten­tially sink­ing the RNC’s di­git­al re­hab­il­it­a­tion be­fore it really be­gins.

What We're Following See More »
Trump Delays Tariffs on Japanese and European Cars
2 days ago
Trump Unveils New Immigration Proposal
3 days ago
Trump Jr. Agrees to Testify in the Senate
5 days ago

"Donald Trump Jr. has struck a last minute deal to comply with a subpoena from the Senate Intelligence Committee ... Trump Jr. will sit for an interview some time in mid-June for between two and four hours, with the scope limited to five or six topics pertaining to his communications with Russian officials. This will be the last time Trump Jr. has to testify before the Senate Intelligence Committee, according to the terms of the deal."

China Hits Back with Tariffs on $60B in U.S. Goods
6 days ago
China Raising Tariffs
6 days ago

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.