Lawmakers Use Terrorist Alert to Ratchet Up Calls for FISA Reforms

Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-CT)
©2013 Richard A. Bloom
Stacy Kaper
Add to Briefcase
Stacy Kaper
Aug. 7, 2013, 12:24 p.m.

Law­makers’ con­cerns about Amer­ic­ans’ pri­vacy, in par­tic­u­lar the Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Agency’s do­mest­ic sur­veil­lance pro­grams, have not dampened over re­cess.

In fact, some law­makers are mak­ing the ar­gu­ment that the ramped-up state of na­tion­al se­cur­ity that has promp­ted em­bassy clos­ures across North Africa and the Middle East amid an al-Qaida ter­ror­ist alert only el­ev­ates the need to strengthen Amer­ic­ans’ trust in U.S. coun­terter­ror­ism tac­tics.

“It is very im­port­ant to em­phas­ize that the latest se­cur­ity alert and threat warn­ing re­mind us how crit­ic­al the work of our in­tel­li­gence and coun­terter­ror­ism people and agen­cies is to our na­tion,” Sen. Richard Blu­menth­al, D-Conn., said in an in­ter­view. “It de­mands and de­serves the re­spect and trust of the Amer­ic­an people, which is why we need my re­form pro­pos­als to pre­serve, re­in­force, and bol­ster the trust and cred­ib­il­ity of those in­sti­tu­tions.”

He ad­ded, “Most es­pe­cially the FISA Court. “¦ It’s an an­om­aly right now be­cause it’s a black box.”

Blu­menth­al is slated to give a ma­jor policy ad­dress on FISA court re­form Thursday at Har­vard Law School, ar­guing for the need to bet­ter bal­ance Amer­ic­ans’ pri­vacy while main­tain­ing strong na­tion­al se­cur­ity pro­vi­sions. The FISA courts gov­ern re­quests for sur­veil­lance war­rants against sus­pec­ted for­eign-in­tel­li­gence agents in­side the U.S. 

He is push­ing for two bills he in­tro­duced with Sens. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., and Tom Ud­all, D-N.M., just be­fore Con­gress ad­journed last week that would provide a spe­cial ad­voc­ate to the FISA courts to ar­gue for Amer­ic­ans’ right to pri­vacy and an­oth­er to change the FISA judge se­lec­tion pro­cess to force great­er di­versity of view­points and back­grounds.

It is un­clear which if any re­forms will be­come law, but policy ana­lysts agree that mo­mentum is grow­ing in Con­gress to ad­dress the scope of the FISA court.

Last month, Rep. Justin Amash, R-Mich., sent a wake-up call to the ad­min­is­tra­tion and NSA de­fend­ers when he came just a hand­ful of votes shy of suc­ceed­ing on a meas­ure that would have stopped the NSA’s blanket col­lec­tion of tele­phone re­cords of Amer­ic­ans not un­der sus­pi­cion of ter­ror­ism ties.

An even strong NSA de­fend­er, Sen­ate In­tel­li­gence Com­mit­tee Chair­wo­man Di­anne Fein­stein, D-Cal­if., has sug­ges­ted re­du­cing how much so-called metadata the NSA re­tains.

“It’s very likely we’ll see some re­form,” said Steven Bucci, a dir­ect­or of for­eign policy stud­ies with the Her­it­age Found­a­tion, who noted that law­makers’ ques­tions and con­cerns ap­pear to be in­tensi­fy­ing. “Very clearly there is a crit­ic­al mass of le­gis­lat­ors and cit­izens who dis­agree with people like me who think this a good bal­ance of pri­vacy and se­cur­ity.”

Mi­chael O’Han­lon, a seni­or fel­low with the Brook­ings In­sti­tu­tion, said that “the nat­ur­al com­prom­ise hasn’t yet sur­faced,” but law­makers ap­pear in­tent on some re­form.

“I’d pre­dict that Con­gress will want to do something more than simply re­gister its con­cerns and com­plaints,” he said. “There will be on­go­ing vig­or­ous dis­cus­sion.”

Blu­menth­al told Na­tion­al Journ­al Daily that he sees con­sti­tu­tion­al freedoms in jeop­ardy, which he said is even more crit­ic­al in the face of the latest ter­ror­ism alert.

“The core mes­sage will be that we can do both — pre­serve liberty and pri­vacy, and safe­guard na­tion­al se­cur­ity,” he said, pre­view­ing his Har­vard ad­dress. “The chal­lenge is to strike bal­ance.”

Blu­menth­al is con­tinu­ing to push to de­clas­si­fy the courts’ opin­ions be­cause they in ef­fect cre­ate law.

“The FISA court is un­known to many Amer­ic­ans. But it ex­er­cises vast in­vis­ible power,” he said. “The court makes law, but right now it’s secret law, and I think there is a point of con­sensus here that the law at the very least should be made pub­lic, and that is one of the points I’m go­ing to be stress­ing.”

Blu­menth­al said that voters have un­answered ques­tions about the gov­ern­ment’s sur­veil­lance pro­grams.

“I see no pro­spect of the is­sue dis­sip­at­ing either in im­port­ance or pub­lic con­cern,” he said. “I don’t see the is­sue go­ing away dur­ing the re­cess. In fact, when I go around the state of Con­necti­c­ut, a lot of folks are talk­ing about the sur­veil­lance, and the good as well as the bad.”

What We're Following See More »
$618 BILLION IN FUNDING
By a Big Margin, House Passes Defense Bill
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

The National Defense Authorization Act passed the House this morning by a 375-34 vote. The bill, which heads to the Senate next week for final consideration, would fund the military to the tune of $618.7 billion, "about $3.2 billion more than the president requested for fiscal 2017. ... The White House has issued a veto threat on both the House and Senate-passed versions of the bill, but has not yet said if it will sign the compromise bill released by the conference committee this week."

Source:
SUCCEEDS UPTON
Walden to Chair Energy and Commerce Committee
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

"Republicans have elected Rep. Greg Walden (R-OR) the next chairman of the powerful House Energy and Commerce Committee. Walden defeated Reps. John Shimkus (R-IL) and Joe Barton (R-TX), the former committee chairman, in the race for the gavel" to succeed Michgan's Fred Upton.

Source:
BIPARTISAN SUPPORT
Senators Looking to Limit Deportations Under Trump
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

"Democratic and Republican members of the Senate Judiciary Committee are working on legislation that would limit deportations" under President-elect Donald Trump. Leading the effort are Judiciary Committee members Dick Durbin (D-IL) and Lindsey Graham (R-SC). Sen. Jeff Flake (R-AZ) is also expected to sign on.

Source:
REQUIRES CHANGE IN LAW
Trump Taps Mattis for Defense Secretary
2 days ago
BREAKING

Donald Trump has selected retired Marine Gen. James 'Mad Dog' Mattis as his secretary of defense, according to The Washington Post. Mattis retired from active duty just four years ago, so Congress will have "to pass new legislation to bypass a federal law that states secretaries of defense must not have been on active duty in the previous seven years." The official announcement is likely to come next week.

Source:
MEASURE HEADED TO OBAMA
Senate OKs 10-Year Extension of Iran Sanctions
2 days ago
THE LATEST
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login