Yemen Didn’t Really Foil a Terror Plot Yesterday

Add to Briefcase
Dashiell Bennett, The Atlantic Wire
Aug. 8, 2013, 6:02 a.m.

NEW YORK — In the wake of Amer­ic­an warn­ings about al-Qaida ter­ror­ists in Ye­men, of­fi­cials in the Ar­a­bi­an coun­try claimed on Wed­nes­day to have thwarted a ma­jor ter­ror­ist plot on their oil fa­cil­it­ies. Now it turns out that wasn’t ex­actly true. A spokes­per­son for Prime Min­is­ter Mo­hammed Salem Basind­wa said earli­er in the day that a large group of al-Qaida mil­it­ants were plan­ning to seize and pos­sibly blow up a large oil ter­min­al in the province of Ha­d­ramout, and also use the at­tack to seize the south­ern cit­ies of Mukalla and Bawzeer. The claim was re­por­ted by every­one from Al Jaz­eera to The New York Times, but it didn’t take long for some ex­perts to ques­tion wheth­er the du­bi­ous re­ports about the at­tack were ac­tu­ally true.

Even the spokes­per­son for Ye­men’s em­bassy in Wash­ing­ton un­der­cut the story by tweet­ing that Al-Qaida in the Ar­a­bi­an Pen­in­sula “doesn’t have the man power nor the cap­ab­il­it­ies to cap­ture a city the size of Mukkala.” U.S. of­fi­cials also said that claim of thwart­ing a large at­tack may have been pre­ma­ture, even if Ha­d­ramout is a base of op­er­a­tions for Ye­men and small at­tacks on oil fa­cil­it­ies are quite com­mon (even among non-al-Qaida tribes­man.) The U.S. also stressed that it didn’t change their as­sess­ment of the lar­ger threat that promp­ted them to close the San­aa em­bassy and with­draw all non-es­sen­tial per­son­nel.

In the end, the of­fi­cial state me­dia out­let, SABA, fi­nally re­por­ted that there was no spe­cif­ic threat against the oil ter­min­al, ef­fect­ively un­der­min­ing what was be­ing touted as a ma­jor in­tel­li­gence vic­tory for Ye­men’s em­battled gov­ern­ment. There was also some push back on the idea of the al-Qaida “Le­gion of Doom” con­fer­ence call that sup­posedly tipped off the Amer­ic­ans to the lar­ger threat. That may just be ter­ror­ism ana­lysts over-think­ing the situ­ation, but some of the de­tails just seemed too im­plaus­ible (and too dif­fi­cult to check.)

While the Ye­meni dip­lo­mat is cor­rect that al-Qaida can’t con­trol a siz­able city in Ye­men (and they’ve tried sev­er­al times in the past), the gov­ern­ment in San­aa can’t con­trol large por­tions of its own coun­try either. They’ve had mixed suc­cess bat­tling al-Qaida’s grow­ing in­flu­ence, while sim­ul­tan­eously fight­ing against loc­al tribes who of­ten switch al­le­gi­ances in their own battles against the un­pop­u­lar cent­ral gov­ern­ment. That makes Ye­men a dif­fi­cult stra­tegic part­ner for the U.S., giv­ing them free reign to launch drone strikes — there have now been six in the last two weeks, which only gen­er­ates more hatred of the Amer­ic­ans — while not al­low­ing oth­er tac­tics that might be more pop­u­lar and use­ful to the Ye­meni people.

Re­prin­ted with per­mis­sion from the At­lantic Wire. The ori­gin­al story can be found here.


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.