Yemen Didn’t Really Foil a Terror Plot Yesterday

Dashiell Bennett, The Atlantic Wire
Aug. 8, 2013, 6:02 a.m.

NEW YORK — In the wake of Amer­ic­an warn­ings about al-Qaida ter­ror­ists in Ye­men, of­fi­cials in the Ar­a­bi­an coun­try claimed on Wed­nes­day to have thwarted a ma­jor ter­ror­ist plot on their oil fa­cil­it­ies. Now it turns out that wasn’t ex­actly true. A spokes­per­son for Prime Min­is­ter Mo­hammed Salem Basind­wa said earli­er in the day that a large group of al-Qaida mil­it­ants were plan­ning to seize and pos­sibly blow up a large oil ter­min­al in the province of Ha­d­ramout, and also use the at­tack to seize the south­ern cit­ies of Mukalla and Bawzeer. The claim was re­por­ted by every­one from Al Jaz­eera to The New York Times, but it didn’t take long for some ex­perts to ques­tion wheth­er the du­bi­ous re­ports about the at­tack were ac­tu­ally true.

Even the spokes­per­son for Ye­men’s em­bassy in Wash­ing­ton un­der­cut the story by tweet­ing that Al-Qaida in the Ar­a­bi­an Pen­in­sula “doesn’t have the man power nor the cap­ab­il­it­ies to cap­ture a city the size of Mukkala.” U.S. of­fi­cials also said that claim of thwart­ing a large at­tack may have been pre­ma­ture, even if Ha­d­ramout is a base of op­er­a­tions for Ye­men and small at­tacks on oil fa­cil­it­ies are quite com­mon (even among non-al-Qaida tribes­man.) The U.S. also stressed that it didn’t change their as­sess­ment of the lar­ger threat that promp­ted them to close the San­aa em­bassy and with­draw all non-es­sen­tial per­son­nel.

In the end, the of­fi­cial state me­dia out­let, SABA, fi­nally re­por­ted that there was no spe­cif­ic threat against the oil ter­min­al, ef­fect­ively un­der­min­ing what was be­ing touted as a ma­jor in­tel­li­gence vic­tory for Ye­men’s em­battled gov­ern­ment. There was also some push back on the idea of the al-Qaida “Le­gion of Doom” con­fer­ence call that sup­posedly tipped off the Amer­ic­ans to the lar­ger threat. That may just be ter­ror­ism ana­lysts over-think­ing the situ­ation, but some of the de­tails just seemed too im­plaus­ible (and too dif­fi­cult to check.)

While the Ye­meni dip­lo­mat is cor­rect that al-Qaida can’t con­trol a siz­able city in Ye­men (and they’ve tried sev­er­al times in the past), the gov­ern­ment in San­aa can’t con­trol large por­tions of its own coun­try either. They’ve had mixed suc­cess bat­tling al-Qaida’s grow­ing in­flu­ence, while sim­ul­tan­eously fight­ing against loc­al tribes who of­ten switch al­le­gi­ances in their own battles against the un­pop­u­lar cent­ral gov­ern­ment. That makes Ye­men a dif­fi­cult stra­tegic part­ner for the U.S., giv­ing them free reign to launch drone strikes — there have now been six in the last two weeks, which only gen­er­ates more hatred of the Amer­ic­ans — while not al­low­ing oth­er tac­tics that might be more pop­u­lar and use­ful to the Ye­meni people.

Re­prin­ted with per­mis­sion from the At­lantic Wire. The ori­gin­al story can be found here.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4378) }}

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
6 hours ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
6 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
6 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
6 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
7 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×