Next week, Wayne State University junior Michael Stroud will set up his table for College Republicans, handing out literature, pens, stickers, and even bottle openers to passing students at his urban Detroit school.
“Come join the best party on campus,” the 20-year-old Michigan native tells them.
In the last election, young people didn’t agree with that boast; 60 percent of voters between 18 and 29 voted for President Obama over Republican Mitt Romney, a difference of 5 million votes.
Economic conditions before the 2012 election, from high unemployment to skyrocketing college costs, should have made it easier for young people to choose Romney, says Alex Smith, the chairwoman of the College Republican National Committee. “We didn’t feel like there was a whole lot there to motivate them to vote for the president again,” says Smith, who was elected as the first female chair of the 121-year-old organization in June. “But it was my generation who cast the deciding votes against my party.”
This group — the country’s oldest student organization, present on 1,800 campuses, nurturer of conservative leaders such as Karl Rove, Jack Abramoff, Ralph Reed, and Grover Norquist — has released a blueprint for fixing the problem.
The 90-page College Republicans report, “Grand Old Party for a Brand New Generation,” doesn’t sugarcoat the Republican Party’s difficulties with young voters. Many of its findings, in fact, are similar to the “autopsy report” the Republican National Committee released earlier this year. The report outlines problems with digital outreach and the brand, compiled from two national surveys and several focus groups in California, Ohio, and Florida. It concludes that the GOP is seen as “rich, lacking in diversity, and being old-fashioned.”
Like the national party, College Republicans are trying to ramp up grassroots and digital activities. The group is giving its members Facebook gift cards to promote online outreach to students across campuses, while also encouraging chapter presidents to increase their face-to-face interactions with students through new events and organizing on the ground.
All of that can help, and inviting a more diverse array of students who believe in the “big tent” approach to party politics might improve membership. But the biggest elephant in the room has always been the national party’s policies. And that’s where it gets tricky.
GOP opposition to abortion rights, marriage equality, and immigration reform is making it hard for College Republicans to reach young voters. Romney faced a similar challenge with both women and young people and attempted to solve the problem with an economic message. He tried to convince working mothers and younger voters that Obama’s economic plan was hurting them and that his would improve their lives. But the diversion strategy didn’t work with either group. In addition to losing young voters, Romney also lost the female vote nationally, 45 percent to Obama’s 54 percent.
Despite that failure, College Republicans are essentially using the same strategy: Don’t talk about the sensitive issues.
Take same-sex marriage. Polls show that young people — and the rest of Americans — are increasingly supportive of same-sex marriage and gay rights. While Democrats have by and large embraced this position, an overwhelming majority of Republicans have not, and younger voters noticed. But the College Republicans report notes, “A large majority of respondents were open to voting for a candidate they disagree with on this issue.” That is seen as an opening to talk about the economy, and to bring young people into the fold to work for policy changes over the long haul.
And it will be a long haul, judging by what happened to this week to Stephanie Petelos, chairwoman of the College Republican Federation of Alabama. After she expressed support for same-sex marriage, leaders of the Alabama Republican Party criticized her and threatened to remove her from state party leadership. This sort of reaction could have a chilling effect, Petelos told the Alabama Political Reporter: “I think a lot of people would be actively for it if they didn’t live in fear of backlash from party leaders.”
Same-sex marriage is a “huge issue,” says Ted Dooley, a Boston College senior and the Massachusetts state chairman. “But if you’re concerned about finding a job after graduation, join College Republicans. There is a divide, and we have to understand it. But you have to get involved in the party to change the policy of it.”
He also makes the same arguments to libertarian students, who echo the divide seen on the national stage right now.
Since the RNC released its report in March, members of the party have lambasted the results and many of the suggested changes have gone by the wayside. In particular, it is unclear if House Republicans will go along with one of its chief recommendations: support for comprehensive immigration reform. Several Republicans, notably Rep. Steve King of Iowa, have amped up their rhetoric in the immigration debate and opposed any proposals that have a path to citizenship. Rep. Justin Amash, a tea-party favorite from Michigan, said the “political establishment misses the point” and the report could push conservatives away.
Some members of the College Republicans say they are doing a better job than national Republicans of embracing their report and making the changes it recommends. “You hear a lot about how members of the national committee are rejecting the report or not accepting and throwing aside some of the policy polling that they did. We’re more accepting of it. We see it on the ground. We realize we need to change,” Dooley said.
For now, the centerpiece of the new strategy is luring people into the fold with the tools and policy positions currently available. Stroud is already thinking about ways to expand his 160-person chapter on Wayne State’s 29,000-student campus. Maybe he’ll bring in Republican Gov. Rick Snyder. Or maybe he’ll take some chapter members to a gun range. His eyes are on the midterm elections.
“Yes, it is an off-year,” Stroud says. “But it is most important that we build our framework this year, looking forward to the incredibly important 2014 election cycle.”
What We're Following See More »
After keeping the information private for most of the lead-up to the debate on Monday, it has been revealed that longtime Clinton aide Philippe Reines has been playing the role of Donald Trump in her debate prep. Reines knows Clinton better than most, able to identify both her strengths and weaknesses, and his selection for a sparring partner shows that Clinton is preparing for the brash and confrontational Donald Trump many have come to expect.
- A national Washington Post/ABC News poll shows Clinton leading Trump by just two points among likely voters, 46% to 44%.
- A national Bloomberg poll out Monday morning by Selzer & Co. has Clinton and Trump tied at 46% in a two-way race, and Trump ahead 43% to 41% in a four-way race.
- A CNN/ORC poll in Colorado shows likely voters’ support for Trump at 42%, 41% for Clinton, and a CNN/ORC poll in Pennsylvania has Clinton at 45% and Trump at 44%.
- A Portland Press Herald/UNH survey in Maine has Clinton leading Trump in ME-01 and Trump ahead in ME-02.
More than 30 times, in the case of some donors. Long before Cruz endorsed Trump—and before he even snubbed the nominee at the Republican National Convention—"the senator quietly began renting his vast donor email file to his former rival, pocketing at least tens of thousands of dollars, and more likely hundreds of thousands, that can be used to bankroll the Texan’s own political future."
"A new Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll found that 34% of registered voters think the three presidential debates would be extremely or quite important in helping them decide whom to support for president. About 11% of voters are considered 'debate persuadables'—that is, they think the debates are important and are either third-party voters or only loosely committed to either major-party candidate."
Will he or won't he? That's the question surrounding Donald Trump and his on-again, off-again threats to bring onetime Bill Clinton paramour Gennifer Flowers to the debate as his guest. An assistant to flowers initially said she'd be there, but Trump campaign chief Kellyanne Conway "said on ABC’s 'This Week' that the Trump campaign had not invited Flowers to the debate, but she didn’t rule out the possibility of Flowers being in the audience."