An Afghan Army soldier opened fire during a meeting of high-ranking American, NATO, and Afghan military officials on Tuesday, killing a U.S. Army major general and wounding a German brigadier general and as many as 14 other coalition forces, officials said.
The brazen attack took place at the Marshal Fahim National Defense University in Kabul City, where International Security Assistance Forces, ISAF, are training officers of the Afghan National Security Forces. Many were “seriously wounded,” said Rear Adm. John Kirby, a Pentagon spokesman.
The attacker was killed at the scene, though it’s unclear who killed him. “We believe this individual was a member of the Afghan security force,” Kirby said, adding that a joint ISAF-Afghan investigation is underway. “As I understand it, it as a routine visit to the National Defense University, which is akin to sort of their officers’ academy.”
Kirby would not release information about the fallen U.S. Army two-star general until his family could be notified. Officials believe he is the highest-ranking solider to be killed in Afghanistan. “I’m loath to make a historical statement now,” Kirby said. “If not the [highest-ranking], certainly one of the highest-ranking.”
As the war winds down and the Afghan military takes the lead in ensuring its own security, the insider attack highlights the increasing difficulty of controlling Afghan military installations. “We don’t control the vetting of the Afghans. The Afghans do,” said Ret. Air Force Lt. Col. Rick Francona, a military analyst for CNN. “They control who has access.” Insider attacks increased to an alarming level in 2012. Since then, ISAF officials have put several measures in place to help protect coalition troops, such as restrictions on where weapons can be carried. But, as Francona said, “You’re at the mercy of the Afghans because it becomes their facility.”
ISAF officials established several new procedures to take precautions after a spate of insider attacks in 2012, but Kirby said it’s impossible to prevent them completely. “ISAF did institute some measures to help mitigate the threat,” he said, “not eliminate it, but mitigate it.”
“Afghanistan is still a war zone, so it’s impossible to completely eliminate that threat, particularly in a place like Afghanistan, but you can work hard to mitigate it,” he said, adding that the drop in such attacks is a “testament to the good work authorities have done in ISAF to mitigate that.”
In a statement, Afghan President Hamid Karzai said the attack was carried out by people who “don’t want to see Afghanistan have strong institutions.” Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel called ISAF Commander Gen. Joseph Dunford, who reassured him that the trust between ISAF and Afghan forces was still strong. The Afghans “continue to perform at a very strong level of confidence and competence,” Kirby said, and their ability “grows stronger by the week.”
“I’ve seen no indication that there’s a degradation of trust,” Kirby said.
The attack also comes as ISAF prepares for a change of command. Dunford will head to Washington soon to become the next Marine Corps commandant and Army Vice Chief of Staff Gen. John Campbell is heading to Kabul later this month to replace Dunford. Campbell will essentially bring the war to its official end after more than 13 years. Campbell will oversee the drawdown of U.S. troops, which will shrink to a residual force of 9,800 by the end of this year.
Recent reports indicate that the Taliban has been gaining ground during this fighting season, and some officials have expressed the concern that they’re just waiting out the drawdown of ISAF forces. Yet U.S. military leaders have said that any recent gains made by the Taliban are fleeting, as they are unable to hold any territory.
“I don’t see any impact to the current plans to drawdown our forces in Afghanistan,” Kirby said.
What We're Following See More »
Two powerful House members—Transportation and Infrastructure Committee Chairman Bill Shuster (R-PA) and Veterans Affairs Committee Chair Jeff Miller (R-FL)—are throwing their support behind Donald Trump.
There are not "ongoing, direct conversations between" the Bernie Sanders camp and the Hillary Clinton camp regarding "the platform or rules changes," but Sanders "is already making his opening arguments" about those issues on the stump. Sanders is putting "complaints about closed primaries" atop his stump speeches lately, and figures to start a "conversation about the role of superdelegates in the nominating process." He said, “Our goal, whether we win or we do not win, is to transform the Democratic Party."
Well, this is unsubtle. Former Speaker John Boehner called Ted Cruz "lucifer in the flesh," adding that he "never worked with a more miserable son of a bitch in my life." Boehner has endorsed John Kasich, but he said he'd vote for Donald Trump over Cruz. He also praised Bernie Sanders, calling him the most honest politician in the race, and predicted that Joe Biden may yet have a role to play in the Democratic contest, especially if Hillary Clinton runs into legal trouble over her emails.