An Afghan Army soldier opened fire during a meeting of high-ranking American, NATO, and Afghan military officials on Tuesday, killing a U.S. Army major general and wounding a German brigadier general and as many as 14 other coalition forces, officials said.
The brazen attack took place at the Marshal Fahim National Defense University in Kabul City, where International Security Assistance Forces, ISAF, are training officers of the Afghan National Security Forces. Many were “seriously wounded,” said Rear Adm. John Kirby, a Pentagon spokesman.
The attacker was killed at the scene, though it’s unclear who killed him. “We believe this individual was a member of the Afghan security force,” Kirby said, adding that a joint ISAF-Afghan investigation is underway. “As I understand it, it as a routine visit to the National Defense University, which is akin to sort of their officers’ academy.”
Kirby would not release information about the fallen U.S. Army two-star general until his family could be notified. Officials believe he is the highest-ranking solider to be killed in Afghanistan. “I’m loath to make a historical statement now,” Kirby said. “If not the [highest-ranking], certainly one of the highest-ranking.”
As the war winds down and the Afghan military takes the lead in ensuring its own security, the insider attack highlights the increasing difficulty of controlling Afghan military installations. “We don’t control the vetting of the Afghans. The Afghans do,” said Ret. Air Force Lt. Col. Rick Francona, a military analyst for CNN. “They control who has access.” Insider attacks increased to an alarming level in 2012. Since then, ISAF officials have put several measures in place to help protect coalition troops, such as restrictions on where weapons can be carried. But, as Francona said, “You’re at the mercy of the Afghans because it becomes their facility.”
ISAF officials established several new procedures to take precautions after a spate of insider attacks in 2012, but Kirby said it’s impossible to prevent them completely. “ISAF did institute some measures to help mitigate the threat,” he said, “not eliminate it, but mitigate it.”
“Afghanistan is still a war zone, so it’s impossible to completely eliminate that threat, particularly in a place like Afghanistan, but you can work hard to mitigate it,” he said, adding that the drop in such attacks is a “testament to the good work authorities have done in ISAF to mitigate that.”
In a statement, Afghan President Hamid Karzai said the attack was carried out by people who “don’t want to see Afghanistan have strong institutions.” Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel called ISAF Commander Gen. Joseph Dunford, who reassured him that the trust between ISAF and Afghan forces was still strong. The Afghans “continue to perform at a very strong level of confidence and competence,” Kirby said, and their ability “grows stronger by the week.”
“I’ve seen no indication that there’s a degradation of trust,” Kirby said.
The attack also comes as ISAF prepares for a change of command. Dunford will head to Washington soon to become the next Marine Corps commandant and Army Vice Chief of Staff Gen. John Campbell is heading to Kabul later this month to replace Dunford. Campbell will essentially bring the war to its official end after more than 13 years. Campbell will oversee the drawdown of U.S. troops, which will shrink to a residual force of 9,800 by the end of this year.
Recent reports indicate that the Taliban has been gaining ground during this fighting season, and some officials have expressed the concern that they’re just waiting out the drawdown of ISAF forces. Yet U.S. military leaders have said that any recent gains made by the Taliban are fleeting, as they are unable to hold any territory.
“I don’t see any impact to the current plans to drawdown our forces in Afghanistan,” Kirby said.
What We're Following See More »
The Commission on Presidential Debates put out a statement today that gives credence to Donald Trump's claims that he had a bad microphone on Monday night. "Regarding the first debate, there were issues regarding Donald Trump's audio that affected the sound level in the debate hall," read the statement in its entirety.
"A video of Donald Trump testifying under oath about his provocative rhetoric about Mexicans and other Latinos is set to go public" as soon as today. "Trump gave the testimony in June at a law office in Washington in connection with one of two lawsuits he filed last year after prominent chefs reacted to the controversy over his remarks by pulling out of plans to open restaurants at his new D.C. hotel. D.C. Superior Court Judge Brian Holeman said in an order issued Thursday evening that fears the testimony might show up in campaign commercials were no basis to keep the public from seeing the video."
No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."
"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."