U.S. General Killed in Insider Attack in Afghanistan

An Afghan Army soldier opened fire during a meeting of high-ranking American, NATO and Afghan military officials on Tuesday.

US soldiers patrol near Kandahar Airfield on June 3, 2014. Members of the 1st Battalion, 12th Regiment, 4th Brigade Combat Team, 4th Infantry Division patrolled areas near Kandahar Airfield to protect the base from rocket attacks, and also visited Afghan police and polling stations to check on the security for the upcoming presidential election runoff. 
National Journal
Stephanie Gaskell, Defense One
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Stephanie Gaskell, Defense One
Aug. 5, 2014, 11:43 a.m.

An Afghan Army sol­dier opened fire dur­ing a meet­ing of high-rank­ing Amer­ic­an, NATO, and Afghan mil­it­ary of­fi­cials on Tues­day, killing a U.S. Army ma­jor gen­er­al and wound­ing a Ger­man bri­gadier gen­er­al and as many as 14 oth­er co­ali­tion forces, of­fi­cials said.

The brazen at­tack took place at the Mar­shal Fahim Na­tion­al De­fense Uni­versity in Ka­bul City, where In­ter­na­tion­al Se­cur­ity As­sist­ance Forces, ISAF, are train­ing of­ficers of the Afghan Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Forces. Many were “ser­i­ously wounded,” said Rear Adm. John Kirby, a Pentagon spokes­man.

The at­tack­er was killed at the scene, though it’s un­clear who killed him. “We be­lieve this in­di­vidu­al was a mem­ber of the Afghan se­cur­ity force,” Kirby said, adding that a joint ISAF-Afghan in­vest­ig­a­tion is un­der­way. “As I un­der­stand it, it as a routine vis­it to the Na­tion­al De­fense Uni­versity, which is akin to sort of their of­ficers’ academy.”

Kirby would not re­lease in­form­a­tion about the fallen U.S. Army two-star gen­er­al un­til his fam­ily could be no­ti­fied. Of­fi­cials be­lieve he is the highest-rank­ing solider to be killed in Afgh­anistan. “I’m loath to make a his­tor­ic­al state­ment now,” Kirby said. “If not the [highest-rank­ing], cer­tainly one of the highest-rank­ing.”

As the war winds down and the Afghan mil­it­ary takes the lead in en­sur­ing its own se­cur­ity, the in­sider at­tack high­lights the in­creas­ing dif­fi­culty of con­trolling Afghan mil­it­ary in­stall­a­tions. “We don’t con­trol the vet­ting of the Afghans. The Afghans do,” said Ret. Air Force Lt. Col. Rick Francona, a mil­it­ary ana­lyst for CNN. “They con­trol who has ac­cess.” In­sider at­tacks in­creased to an alarm­ing level in 2012. Since then, ISAF of­fi­cials have put sev­er­al meas­ures in place to help pro­tect co­ali­tion troops, such as re­stric­tions on where weapons can be car­ried. But, as Francona said, “You’re at the mercy of the Afghans be­cause it be­comes their fa­cil­ity.”

ISAF of­fi­cials es­tab­lished sev­er­al new pro­ced­ures to take pre­cau­tions after a spate of in­sider at­tacks in 2012, but Kirby said it’s im­possible to pre­vent them com­pletely. “ISAF did in­sti­tute some meas­ures to help mit­ig­ate the threat,” he said, “not elim­in­ate it, but mit­ig­ate it.”

“Afgh­anistan is still a war zone, so it’s im­possible to com­pletely elim­in­ate that threat, par­tic­u­larly in a place like Afgh­anistan, but you can work hard to mit­ig­ate it,” he said, adding that the drop in such at­tacks is a “test­a­ment to the good work au­thor­it­ies have done in ISAF to mit­ig­ate that.”

In a state­ment, Afghan Pres­id­ent Ham­id Kar­zai said the at­tack was car­ried out by people who “don’t want to see Afgh­anistan have strong in­sti­tu­tions.” De­fense Sec­ret­ary Chuck Hagel called ISAF Com­mand­er Gen. Joseph Dun­ford, who re­as­sured him that the trust between ISAF and Afghan forces was still strong. The Afghans “con­tin­ue to per­form at a very strong level of con­fid­ence and com­pet­ence,” Kirby said, and their abil­ity “grows stronger by the week.”

“I’ve seen no in­dic­a­tion that there’s a de­grad­a­tion of trust,” Kirby said.

The at­tack also comes as ISAF pre­pares for a change of com­mand. Dun­ford will head to Wash­ing­ton soon to be­come the next Mar­ine Corps com­mand­ant and Army Vice Chief of Staff Gen. John Camp­bell is head­ing to Ka­bul later this month to re­place Dun­ford. Camp­bell will es­sen­tially bring the war to its of­fi­cial end after more than 13 years. Camp­bell will over­see the draw­down of U.S. troops, which will shrink to a re­sid­ual force of 9,800 by the end of this year.

Re­cent re­ports in­dic­ate that the Taliban has been gain­ing ground dur­ing this fight­ing sea­son, and some of­fi­cials have ex­pressed the con­cern that they’re just wait­ing out the draw­down of ISAF forces. Yet U.S. mil­it­ary lead­ers have said that any re­cent gains made by the Taliban are fleet­ing, as they are un­able to hold any ter­rit­ory.

“I don’t see any im­pact to the cur­rent plans to draw­down our forces in Afgh­anistan,” Kirby said.

What We're Following See More »
WITH LIVE BLOGGING
Trump Deposition Video Is Online
20 hours ago
STAFF PICKS

The video of Donald Trump's deposition in his case against restaurateur Jeffrey Zakarian is now live. Slate's Jim Newell and Josh Voorhees are live-blogging it while they watch.

Source:
SOUND LEVEL AFFECTED
Debate Commission Admits Issues with Trump’s Mic
21 hours ago
THE LATEST

The Commission on Presidential Debates put out a statement today that gives credence to Donald Trump's claims that he had a bad microphone on Monday night. "Regarding the first debate, there were issues regarding Donald Trump's audio that affected the sound level in the debate hall," read the statement in its entirety.

Source:
TRUMP VS. CHEFS
Trump Deposition Video to Be Released
21 hours ago
THE LATEST

"A video of Donald Trump testifying under oath about his provocative rhetoric about Mexicans and other Latinos is set to go public" as soon as today. "Trump gave the testimony in June at a law office in Washington in connection with one of two lawsuits he filed last year after prominent chefs reacted to the controversy over his remarks by pulling out of plans to open restaurants at his new D.C. hotel. D.C. Superior Court Judge Brian Holeman said in an order issued Thursday evening that fears the testimony might show up in campaign commercials were no basis to keep the public from seeing the video."

Source:
A CANDIDATE TO BE ‘PROUD’ OF
Chicago Tribune Endorses Gary Johnson
1 days ago
THE LATEST

No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."

NEVER TRUMP
USA Today Weighs in on Presidential Race for First Time Ever
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."

Source:
×