President Obama Reflects on America’s Inability to Influence the World

In a Friday press conference the president answers the question: “Has the United States of America lost its influence in the world? Have you, yours?”

National Journal
Brian Resnick
Aug. 1, 2014, 12:04 p.m.

Lately, the pres­id­ent has been strug­gling to turn his vis­ions for for­eign and do­mest­ic af­fairs in­to real­ity. Two sa­li­ent ex­amples: A U.S.-brokered cease-fire for the Ga­za con­flict fell through with­in hours (though for reas­ons bey­ond the con­trol of the U.S.), and it’s un­likely he’ll get any­where near the amount of money he’s asked Con­gress for to deal with the bor­der crisis.

Obama ad­dressed these short­com­ings in a press con­fer­ence Fri­day af­ter­noon. He was asked, “Has the United States of Amer­ica lost its in­flu­ence in the world? Have you, yours?”

Be­low is his re­sponse. It’s can­did, though hope­ful, and marked with a shade of resig­na­tion. (The later quotes were in re­sponse to a sep­ar­ate ques­tion, but con­tin­ued his thoughts on the mat­ter.) Em­phas­is is ours:

Look, this is a com­mon theme that folks bring up. Ap­par­ently, people have for­got­ten that Amer­ica, as the most power­ful coun­try on Earth, still does not con­trol everything around the world. And so our dip­lo­mat­ic ef­forts of­ten take time. They of­ten will see pro­gress and then a step back­wards. That’s been true in the Middle East. That’s been true in Europe. That’s been true in Asia. That’s the nature of world af­fairs. It’s not neat and it’s not smooth….

If you look at the 20th cen­tury and the early part of this cen­tury, there are a lot of con­flicts that Amer­ica doesn’t re­solve. That’s al­ways been true. That doesn’t mean we stop try­ing. And it’s not a meas­ure of Amer­ic­an in­flu­ence on any giv­en day or at any giv­en mo­ment that there are con­flicts around the world that are dif­fi­cult. Con­flict in North­ern Ire­land raged for a very, very long time un­til fi­nally something broke, where the party de­cided that it wasn’t worth killing each oth­er. The Palestini­an-Is­raeli con­flict has been go­ing on even longer than you’ve been re­port­ing.

You know, and I don’t think at any point was there a sug­ges­tion that Amer­ica didn’t have in­flu­ence, just be­cause we wer­en’t able to fi­nal­ize an Is­raeli-Palestini­an peace deal. You will re­call that the situ­ations like Kosovo and Bos­nia raged on for quite some time. And there was a lot more death and blood­shed than there has been so far in the Ukrain­i­an situ­ation be­fore it ul­ti­mately did get re­solved.

And so I re­cog­nize with so many dif­fer­ent is­sues pop­ping up around the world, some­times it may seem as if this is an ab­er­ra­tion or it’s un­usu­al. But the truth of the mat­ter is that there’s a big world out there, and that as in­dis­pens­able as we are to try to lead it, there’s still go­ing to be tra­gedies out there and there are go­ing to be con­flicts and our job is to just make sure that we con­tin­ue to pro­ject what’s right, what’s just….

I mean, the fact of the mat­ter is that in all these crises that have been men­tioned, there may be some tan­gen­tial risks to the United States. In some cases, as in Ir­aq and IS­IS, those are dangers that have to be ad­dressed right now. And we have to take them very ser­i­ously. But for the most part, these are not — you know, the rock­ets aren’t be­ing fired in­to the United States. The reas­on we are con­cerned is be­cause we re­cog­nize we got some spe­cial re­spons­ib­il­it­ies. We have to be — have some hu­mil­ity about what we can and can’t ac­com­plish. We have to re­cog­nize that our re­sources are fi­nite and we are com­ing out of a dec­ade of war. And, you know, our mil­it­ary has been stretched very hard. As has our budget. Nev­er­the­less, we try.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
10 hours ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
10 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
10 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
10 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
11 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×