Should the Government Be Worried About Stoned Drivers?

Congress is looking into the effects of intoxicated driving, but the jury’s still out on how to best police it.

Marijuana plants grow at Perennial Holistic Wellness Center, a not-for-profit medical marijuana dispensary in operation since 2006, on September 7, 2012 in Los Angeles, California. 
National Journal
Emma Roller
Add to Briefcase
Emma Roller
July 31, 2014, 9:34 a.m.

The House Over­sight and Gov­ern­ment Re­form Com­mit­tee has mostly con­cerned it­self of late with the IRS scan­dal, the prob­lem­at­ic rol­lout of the Obama­care web­site, and the ter­ror­ist at­tack on the U.S. Em­bassy in Benghazi, Libya. But on Thursday, the pan­el turned its at­ten­tion to marijuana use by drivers, in­clud­ing pi­lots, sub­way train op­er­at­ors, mar­iners, and school bus drivers.

At the hear­ing, called “Planes, Trains and Auto­mo­biles: Op­er­at­ing While Stoned,” mem­bers heard testi­mony about the im­pact of driv­ing un­der the in­flu­ence of marijuana. Rep. John Mica, who once held up a fake joint at an­oth­er hear­ing, lam­basted the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment for its “chaot­ic and in­con­sist­ent policies on marijuana.”

There’s no fed­er­al bench­mark for THC — the psy­cho­act­ive in­gredi­ent in marijuana — like there is for blood al­co­hol con­tent, be­cause un­der fed­er­al law any con­sump­tion of marijuana is il­leg­al. Some states that have de­crim­in­al­ized med­ic­al or re­cre­ation­al marijuana use have im­ple­men­ted their own bench­marks. Col­or­ado, for ex­ample, has set a lim­it of 5 nano­grams of THC per mil­li­liter of blood.

Since THC is fat-sol­uble, it can re­main in your sys­tem long after its in­tox­ic­at­ing ef­fects have worn off. In states such as Illinois, where marijuana is still il­leg­al, hav­ing any trace of THC in your sys­tem — even if you smoked weed days be­fore get­ting pulled over — can get you a DUI.

Col­or­ado traffic cops have also been trained to re­cog­nize the be­ha­vi­or of drivers who may be un­der the in­flu­ence of marijuana, as part of its “Drive high, get a DUI” cam­paign.

But the sci­ence be­hind marijuana in­tox­ic­a­tion and driv­ing is still murky. There’s no such thing as a “weed breath­alyz­er.” And un­like al­co­hol, marijuana (and oth­er drugs) can have vastly dif­fer­ent ef­fects, de­pend­ing on who’s us­ing it. THC does not meta­bol­ize as pre­dict­ably as al­co­hol, so it’s more dif­fi­cult to set a con­crete level at which someone can be con­sidered in­tox­ic­ated — and im­paired.

And un­like al­co­hol DUIs, which are tracked at the state level, marijuana in­tox­ic­a­tion is not mon­itored as closely, mak­ing it more dif­fi­cult to as­cer­tain how much of a prob­lem it is. One study found that, between 1999 and 2010, the pro­por­tion of people killed while driv­ing with marijuana in their sys­tem tripled, from 4 per­cent to 12 per­cent. But that data was in­con­clus­ive, be­cause it’s im­possible to know wheth­er those drivers con­sumed marijuana that day, or a week be­fore their ac­ci­dent.

Among the re­search in­to in­tox­ic­ated driv­ing, one data point re­mains true: Al­co­hol use is the No. 1 cause of death on Amer­ic­an road­ways. In 2012, al­co­hol ac­coun­ted for 31 per­cent of driv­ing fatal­it­ies — killing more than 10,000 people na­tion­wide.

A 1993 re­port from the Na­tion­al High­way Traffic Safety Ad­min­is­tra­tion found that drivers un­der the in­flu­ence of marijuana are gen­er­ally slower, clum­si­er, and have dif­fi­culty stay­ing in their lane. “Drivers un­der the in­flu­ence of marijuana re­tain in­sight in their per­form­ance and will com­pensate when they can, for ex­ample, by slow­ing down or in­creas­ing ef­fort,” the re­port’s au­thors found at the time. “As a con­sequence, THC’s ad­verse ef­fects on driv­ing per­form­ance ap­pear re­l­at­ively small.”

Some users can still drive com­pet­ently with a high dosage of THC. One driver in Wash­ing­ton — where marijuana is now leg­al — was able to pass a road test with sev­en times the leg­al lim­it of THC in her sys­tem. Still, with any in­tox­ic­at­ing sub­stance, it’s bet­ter to be safe than sorry. But while marijuana is an in­creas­ing con­cern on the road, the more dan­ger­ous prob­lem con­tin­ues to be our re­la­tion­ship to a sub­stance that’s already leg­al.

What We're Following See More »
ANOTHER GOP MODERATE TO HER SIDE
John Warner to Endorse Clinton
5 hours ago
THE LATEST

"Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton will score another high-powered Republican endorsement on Wednesday, according to a campaign aide: retired senator John Warner of Virginia, a popular GOP maverick with renowned military credentials."

Source:
AUTHORITY OF EPA IN QUESTION
Appeals Court Hears Clean Power Plant Case
5 hours ago
THE LATEST

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit on Tuesday "heard several hours of oral arguments" over the Environmental Protection Agency's Clean Power Plan rules. The 10-judge panel "focused much of their questioning on whether the EPA had overstepped its legal authority by seeking to broadly compel this shift away from coal, a move the EPA calls the Best System of Emission Reduction, or BSER. The states and companies suing the EPA argue the agency doesn’t have the authority to regulate anything outside of a power plant itself."

Source:
$28 MILLION THIS WEEK
Here Come the Ad Buys
5 hours ago
THE LATEST

"Spending by super PACs tied to Donald Trump friends such as Ben Carson and banker Andy Beal will help make this week the general election's most expensive yet. Republicans and Democrats will spend almost $28 million on radio and television this week, according to advertising records, as Trump substantially increases his advertising buy for the final stretch. He's spending $6.4 million in nine states, part of what aides have said will be a $100 million television campaign through Election Day."

Source:
UNLIKELY TO GET A VOTE, LIKELY TO ANGER GOP SENATORS
Obama Nominates Ambassador to Cuba
9 hours ago
THE LATEST
GOP REFUSED VOTE ON FCC COMMISIONER
Reid Blocks Tech Bill Over “Broken Promise”
9 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Monday night's debate may have inspired some in Congress, as Senate Minority Leader has decided to take a stand of his own. Reid is declining to allow a vote on a "bipartisan bill that would bolster U.S. spectrum availability and the deployment of wireless broadband." Why? Because of a "broken promise" made a year ago by Republicans, who have refused to vote on confirmation for a Democratic commissioner on the Federal Communications Commission to a second term. Harry Reid then took it a step further, invoking another confirmation vote still outstanding, that of Supreme Court nominee Merrick Garland.

Source:
×