Senate appropriators last week approved a bill that would require the Pentagon to study how to modernize facilities storing U.S. nuclear warheads.
Language inserted by Senator Mary Landrieu (D-La.) during a committee mark-up of the fiscal 2015 defense appropriations legislation would give the Air Force three months to develop a comprehensive plan for updating its five warhead storage sites, according to a press release from the lawmaker’s office.
The five Air Force sites presently authorized to house nuclear arms are Minot Air Force Base, N.D.; Malmstrom Air Force Base, Mont.; F.E. Warren Air Force Base, Wyo.; Whiteman Air Force Base, Mo.; and Kirtland Air Force Base, N.M., according to Hans Kristensen, director of the Federation of American Scientists’ Nuclear Information Project.
Landrieu is particularly focused on seeing the Barksdale Air Force Base’s conventional-munitions storage area upgraded to handle nuclear arms, as it once did in the past. Presently, B-52 bombers based at Barksdale, headquarters of Air Force Global Strike Command, must fly to other bases to be loaded with atomic weapons.
Barksdale is second-in-line on the Air Force’s list of weapon storage areas slated to receive an upgrade, according to the press release. Landrieu’s amendment would require the Air Force to explain its rationale for prioritizing which storage sites get upgrades.
“I’m proud to lead the efforts of our delegation to ensure that the Global Strike Command and Barksdale Air Force Base receive the attention they deserve. Modernizing the nuclear weapons storage area at Barksdale will give our military the broad and deep reach it needs to protect our nation and provide stability for our allies across the world,” Landrieu said in released comments.
The defense appropriations bill now awaits consideration by the full Senate.
The Louisiana lawmaker’s office told the Shreveport Times it would cost approximately $300 million and take several years to restore Barksdale’s nuclear weapons-holding capability.
Landrieu also voiced support for seeing the head of Global Strike Command elevated to a four-star position, as is planned by the Air Force.
What We're Following See More »
"Nearly half of American voters who support either Democrat Hillary Clinton or Republican Donald Trump for the White House said they will mainly be trying to block the other side from winning, according to a Reuters/Ipsos poll released Thursday." When Trump supporters were asked to give their primary reason for supporting him, 47% said to block Clinton from winning. In almost a mirror image, 46% of Clinton supporters said they were primarily out to thwart Trump.
"Like Donald Trump himself, the Trump campaign’s new national finance chairman has a long history of contributing to Democrats—including Hillary Clinton. Private investor Steven Mnuchin, Trump’s new campaign fundraising guru, has contributed more than $120,000" to candidates since 1995, about half of which has gone to Democrats.
Paul Ryan told CNN today he's "not ready" to back Donald Trump at this time. "I'm not there right now," he said. Ryan said Trump needs to unify "all wings of the Republican Party and the conservative movement" and then run a campaign that will allow Americans to "have something that they're proud to support and proud to be a part of. And we've got a ways to go from here to there."
The Daily Beast has unearthed a piece that Donald Trump wrote for Gear magazine in 2000, which anticipates his 2016 sales pitch quite well. "Perhaps it's time for a dealmaker who can get the leaders of Congress to the table, forge consensus, and strike compromise," he writes. Oddly, he opens by defending his reputation as a womanizer: "The hypocrites argue that a man who loves and appreciates beautiful women (and does so legally and openly) shouldn't become a national leader? Is there something wrong with appreciating beautiful women? Don't we want people in public office who show signs of life?"