National Republicans worried anxiously this year that a handful of fringe candidates could repeat the dreadful mistakes of Todd Akin, whose “legitimate rape” comments helped tank the GOP’s Senate chances in 2012.
But it turns out that the Todd Akin of 2014 is Todd Akin.
Akin’s reemergence on the national stage this week — to promote his new book, Firing Back — was an unwelcome surprise for national Republicans, who still credit the former Missouri candidate’s comments with losing not just his race against Democratic Sen. Claire McCaskill but tight Senate contests across the 2012 map.
So far, though, his 2014 doppelganger hasn’t materialized — and almost all the Republicans whom party leaders saw as problematic are out of the picture now.
Paul Broun, for example, the firebrand conservative congressman who ran for the Senate in Georgia and once called the big-bang theory and evolution “lies from the pit of hell,” came in fifth in the state’s May 20 primary. Businessman David Perdue and Rep. Jack Kingston, who made it to the July 22 runoff, were the two candidates in that race seen as least likely to deliver a similar gaffe.
The same was true in Senate races in North Carolina and Mississippi: Physician Greg Brannon and pastor Mark Harris both lost the North Carolina GOP primary to state House Speaker Thom Tillis, delivering the nomination to the candidate national Republicans preferred. McDaniel, whose radio-host past unearthed some offensive comments about women and minorities, is — pending his legal challenge — out of the running in Mississippi.
And in Alaska, 2010 Senate candidate Joe Miller is back for a second try in the Aug. 19 primary, but so far he has gotten little traction against former state Department of Natural Resources Commissioner Dan Sullivan, Lt. Gov. Mead Treadwell, and other candidates.
Akin, in his new book, says his only regret of the 2012 campaign was apologizing for the comments that so many found offensive.
“By asking the public at large for forgiveness, I was validating the willful misinterpretation of what I had said,” he writes, according to an early copy of the book obtained by Politico.
Some Democrats quickly jumped on the Akin news Thursday, tying him to 2014 candidates. While it shows that Democrats still feel Akin resonates, it’s also a sign that no one has taken his place as the GOP bogeyman.
“Todd Akin Is Back “¦ But He Never Really Left,” said the headline on a press release from Sen. Mark Udall’s campaign, which alleged Thursday that the Coloradan’s GOP challenger, Cory Gardner, “carried on crusade” for Akin.
“Akin’s remarks were widely condemned by Republicans trying to avoid bad PR, but radicals like Congressman Cory Gardner still agree with Akin’s offensive and backward policy views,” the release said.
Planned Parenthood, too, put out a release saying three candidates — Gardner, North Carolina’s Tillis, and Texas gubernatorial candidate Greg Abbott — “show similar disregard for survivors of rape and incest.”
But these references to Akin underscore the fact that, thus far, there’s no obvious 2014 scapegoat to fuel Democrats’ “GOP war on women” narrative, and no 2014 comment that has come even close to Akin’s “legitimate rape.” In a year where Democrats must defend so much territory on the Senate map, that’s surely not what they wanted.
What We're Following See More »
President Obama became a surprise topic of contention toward the end of the Democratic debate, as Hillary Clinton reminded viewers that Sanders had challenged the progressive bona fides of President Obama in 2011 and suggested that someone might challenge him from the left. “The kind of criticism that we’ve heard from Senator Sanders about our president I expect from Republicans, I do not expect from someone running for the Democratic nomination to succeed President Obama,” she said. “Madame Secretary, that is a low blow,” replied Sanders, before getting in another dig during his closing statement: “One of us ran against Barack Obama. I was not that candidate.”
It’s all about the 1% and Wall Street versus everyone else for Bernie Sanders—even when he’s talking about race relations. Like Hillary Clinton, he needs to appeal to African-American and Hispanic voters in coming states, but he insists on doing so through his lens of class warfare. When he got a question from the moderators about the plight of black America, he noted that during the great recession, African Americans “lost half their wealth,” and “instead of tax breaks for billionaires,” a Sanders presidency would deliver jobs for kids. On the very next question, he downplayed the role of race in inequality, saying, “It’s a racial issue, but it’s also a general economic issue.”
It’s been said in just about every news story since New Hampshire: the primaries are headed to states where Hillary Clinton will do well among minority voters. Leaving nothing to chance, she underscored that point in her opening statement in the Milwaukee debate tonight, saying more needs to be done to help “African Americans who face discrimination in the job market” and immigrant families. She also made an explicit reference to “equal pay for women’s work.” Those boxes she’s checking are no coincidence: if she wins women, blacks and Hispanics, she wins the nomination.
Under pressure from a judge, the State Department will release about 550 of Hillary Clinton’s emails—“roughly 14 percent of the 3,700 remaining Clinton emails—on Saturday, in the middle of the Presidents Day holiday weekend.” All of the emails were supposed to have been released last month. Related: State subpoenaed the Clinton Foundation last year, which brings the total number of current Clinton investigations to four, says the Daily Caller.