The Todd Akin of 2014 Is “¦ Todd Akin

No Republican has spouted offensive stuff nearly as well as the 2012 candidate, something Democrats can lament as they are denied a GOP bogeyman this year.

U.S. Rep. Todd Akin (R-MO) and Former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich (not pictured) address the media on September 24, 2012 in Kirkwood, Missouri. Gingrich was in the St. Louis area to attend a fundraiser for Akin's U.S. Senate campaign against incumbent Claire McCaskill.
National Journal
Emily Schultheis
Add to Briefcase
Emily Schultheis
July 11, 2014, 8:37 a.m.

Na­tion­al Re­pub­lic­ans wor­ried anxiously this year that a hand­ful of fringe can­did­ates could re­peat the dread­ful mis­takes of Todd Akin, whose “le­git­im­ate rape” com­ments helped tank the GOP’s Sen­ate chances in 2012.

But it turns out that the Todd Akin of 2014 is Todd Akin.

Akin’s ree­m­er­gence on the na­tion­al stage this week — to pro­mote his new book, Fir­ing Back — was an un­wel­come sur­prise for na­tion­al Re­pub­lic­ans, who still cred­it the former Mis­souri can­did­ate’s com­ments with los­ing not just his race against Demo­crat­ic Sen. Claire Mc­Caskill but tight Sen­ate con­tests across the 2012 map.

So far, though, his 2014 dop­pel­gang­er hasn’t ma­ter­i­al­ized — and al­most all the Re­pub­lic­ans whom party lead­ers saw as prob­lem­at­ic are out of the pic­ture now.

Paul Broun, for ex­ample, the firebrand con­ser­vat­ive con­gress­man who ran for the Sen­ate in Geor­gia and once called the big-bang the­ory and evol­u­tion “lies from the pit of hell,” came in fifth in the state’s May 20 primary. Busi­ness­man Dav­id Per­due and Rep. Jack King­ston, who made it to the Ju­ly 22 run­off, were the two can­did­ates in that race seen as least likely to de­liv­er a sim­il­ar gaffe.

The same was true in Sen­ate races in North Car­o­lina and Mis­sis­sippi: Phys­i­cian Greg Bran­non and pas­tor Mark Har­ris both lost the North Car­o­lina GOP primary to state House Speak­er Thom Tillis, de­liv­er­ing the nom­in­a­tion to the can­did­ate na­tion­al Re­pub­lic­ans pre­ferred. McDaniel, whose ra­dio-host past un­earthed some of­fens­ive com­ments about wo­men and minor­it­ies, is — pending his leg­al chal­lenge — out of the run­ning in Mis­sis­sippi.

And in Alaska, 2010 Sen­ate can­did­ate Joe Miller is back for a second try in the Aug. 19 primary, but so far he has got­ten little trac­tion against former state De­part­ment of Nat­ur­al Re­sources Com­mis­sion­er Dan Sul­li­van, Lt. Gov. Mead Tread­well, and oth­er can­did­ates.

Akin, in his new book, says his only re­gret of the 2012 cam­paign was apo­lo­giz­ing for the com­ments that so many found of­fens­ive.

“By ask­ing the pub­lic at large for for­give­ness, I was val­id­at­ing the will­ful mis­in­ter­pret­a­tion of what I had said,” he writes, ac­cord­ing to an early copy of the book ob­tained by Politico.

Some Demo­crats quickly jumped on the Akin news Thursday, ty­ing him to 2014 can­did­ates. While it shows that Demo­crats still feel Akin res­on­ates, it’s also a sign that no one has taken his place as the GOP bo­gey­man.

“Todd Akin Is Back “¦ But He Nev­er Really Left,” said the head­line on a press re­lease from Sen. Mark Ud­all’s cam­paign, which al­leged Thursday that the Col­oradan’s GOP chal­lenger, Cory Gard­ner, “car­ried on cru­sade” for Akin.

“Akin’s re­marks were widely con­demned by Re­pub­lic­ans try­ing to avoid bad PR, but rad­ic­als like Con­gress­man Cory Gard­ner still agree with Akin’s of­fens­ive and back­ward policy views,” the re­lease said.

Planned Par­ent­hood, too, put out a re­lease say­ing three can­did­ates — Gard­ner, North Car­o­lina’s Tillis, and Texas gubernat­ori­al can­did­ate Greg Ab­bott — “show sim­il­ar dis­reg­ard for sur­viv­ors of rape and in­cest.”

But these ref­er­ences to Akin un­der­score the fact that, thus far, there’s no ob­vi­ous 2014 scape­goat to fuel Demo­crats’ “GOP war on wo­men” nar­rat­ive, and no 2014 com­ment that has come even close to Akin’s “le­git­im­ate rape.” In a year where Demo­crats must de­fend so much ter­rit­ory on the Sen­ate map, that’s surely not what they wanted.

What We're Following See More »
CITES CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Lieberman Withdraws from Consideration for FBI Job
3 days ago
THE LATEST
MINIMUM 2 PERCENT GDP
Trump Tells NATO Countries To Pay Up
3 days ago
BREAKING
MANAFORT AND FLYNN
Russians Discussed Influencing Trump Through Aides
3 days ago
THE DETAILS

"American spies collected information last summer revealing that senior Russian intelligence and political officials were discussing how to exert influence over Donald J. Trump through his advisers." The conversations centered around Paul Manafort, who was campaign chairman at the time, and Michael Flynn, former national security adviser and then a close campaign surrogate. Both men have been tied heavily with Russia and Flynn is currently at the center of the FBI investigation into possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.

Source:
BUT WHITE HOUSE MAY USE AGAINST HIM ANYWAY
Ethics Cops Clear Mueller to Work on Trump Case
5 days ago
THE LATEST

"Former FBI Director Robert Mueller has been cleared by U.S. Department of Justice ethics experts to oversee an investigation into possible collusion between then-candidate Donald Trump's 2016 election campaign and Russia." Some had speculated that the White House would use "an ethics rule limiting government attorneys from investigating people their former law firm represented" to trip up Mueller's appointment. Jared Kushner is a client of Mueller's firm, WilmerHale. "Although Mueller has now been cleared by the Justice Department, the White House may still use his former law firm's connection to Manafort and Kushner to undermine the findings of his investigation, according to two sources close to the White House."

Source:
BUSINESSES CAN’T PLEAD FIFTH
Senate Intel to Subpoena Two of Flynn’s Businesses
5 days ago
THE LATEST

Senate Intelligence Committee chairman Richard Burr (R-NC) and ranking member Mark Warner (D-VA) will subpoena two businesses owned by former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn. Burr said, "We would like to hear from General Flynn. We'd like to see his documents. We'd like him to tell his story because he publicly said he had a story to tell."

×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login