Now that the House leadership elections are over, it’s time for another go-round.
At least, that’s how Rep. Luke Messer of Indiana sees it. On Thursday, he confirmed he’s already running to become the next chairman of the House Republican Policy Committee — the fifth-ranking position in party’s leadership ladder.
Messer, who is currently the House GOP freshman class president, says he’s telling Republican colleagues this week he wants their support this fall when internal party elections are again held — and has been encouraged by the responses.
Why so early? “Time flies. We’ve got less than 25 legislative days this year,” explains Messer, 45, “then there’s the election.”
And it’s during the lame-duck session after the Nov. 4 election that reelected members and new members-elect from both parties will choose their new team of leaders for the next session that begins in January.
The job of Republican Policy Committee chair is now held by Rep. James Lankford of Oklahoma. But Lankford won his GOP Senate primary in that state, and will not be returning to the leadership post.
The role of the committee’s chairman is to oversee its preparation of issue and policy papers for the conference, work with rank-and-file members to develop their own legislation, and put those ideas in bill and amendment form.
It’s the House leadership post — below speaker, majority leader, majority whip, and conference chairman — for someone who can focus on minor details of political policy.
“It’s a job for a wonk. I consider myself a wonk,” Messer said.
Does he at all feel sheepish about running for a leadership post, while still serving in his first term of Congress?
Messer says categorically “no.” In fact, he says that at the end of the next election, “more than half of the U.S. Congress would be made up of people here less than five years.”
He said it will be important for these newer members to have someone on the leadership team.
Messer says he hasn’t heard yet about any other aspirants for the job. But then again, it’s early.
What We're Following See More »
President Obama became a surprise topic of contention toward the end of the Democratic debate, as Hillary Clinton reminded viewers that Sanders had challenged the progressive bona fides of President Obama in 2011 and suggested that someone might challenge him from the left. “The kind of criticism that we’ve heard from Senator Sanders about our president I expect from Republicans, I do not expect from someone running for the Democratic nomination to succeed President Obama,” she said. “Madame Secretary, that is a low blow,” replied Sanders, before getting in another dig during his closing statement: “One of us ran against Barack Obama. I was not that candidate.”
It’s all about the 1% and Wall Street versus everyone else for Bernie Sanders—even when he’s talking about race relations. Like Hillary Clinton, he needs to appeal to African-American and Hispanic voters in coming states, but he insists on doing so through his lens of class warfare. When he got a question from the moderators about the plight of black America, he noted that during the great recession, African Americans “lost half their wealth,” and “instead of tax breaks for billionaires,” a Sanders presidency would deliver jobs for kids. On the very next question, he downplayed the role of race in inequality, saying, “It’s a racial issue, but it’s also a general economic issue.”
It’s been said in just about every news story since New Hampshire: the primaries are headed to states where Hillary Clinton will do well among minority voters. Leaving nothing to chance, she underscored that point in her opening statement in the Milwaukee debate tonight, saying more needs to be done to help “African Americans who face discrimination in the job market” and immigrant families. She also made an explicit reference to “equal pay for women’s work.” Those boxes she’s checking are no coincidence: if she wins women, blacks and Hispanics, she wins the nomination.
Under pressure from a judge, the State Department will release about 550 of Hillary Clinton’s emails—“roughly 14 percent of the 3,700 remaining Clinton emails—on Saturday, in the middle of the Presidents Day holiday weekend.” All of the emails were supposed to have been released last month. Related: State subpoenaed the Clinton Foundation last year, which brings the total number of current Clinton investigations to four, says the Daily Caller.