Congress Is Taking On the Escalating NCAA Crisis

A Senate committee grilled the college-sports president over mistreatment of student-athletes.

NCAA president Mark Emmert
National Journal
Jamie Lovegrove
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Jamie Lovegrove
July 10, 2014, 9:18 a.m.

Con­gress is step­ping up pres­sure on NCAA Pres­id­ent Mark Em­mert to make ur­gent re­forms to col­lege ath­let­ics, as he con­tin­ues to de­fend the or­gan­iz­a­tion’s am­a­teur­ism mod­el des­pite mount­ing leg­al and pub­lic-re­la­tions troubles.

While many of the most de­bated cri­tiques of the col­lege-sports sys­tem have ex­is­ted for dec­ades, re­cent pub­lic at­ten­tion and sev­er­al prom­in­ent court cases have pushed the is­sue to a crit­ic­al point and mo­tiv­ated con­gres­sion­al in­volve­ment.

Em­mert ap­peared in a heated three-hour Sen­ate Com­merce Com­mit­tee hear­ing Wed­nes­day along­side prom­in­ent crit­ics and sup­port­ers of the NCAA, two months after a sim­il­ar ses­sion in the House.

As sen­at­ors de­mand an­swers to rising pub­lic de­bate over treat­ment and com­pens­a­tion of stu­dent-ath­letes, Em­mert is try­ing to tread a thin line — as­suaging spe­cif­ic policy con­cerns for a sys­tem he agrees needs fix­ing without over­prom­ising on whole­sale re­struc­tur­ing of the broad­er col­lege-sports mod­el in which he still has faith.

But the hear­ing comes on the heels of a series of dam­aging months for the NCAA’s de­fense of the status quo sys­tem.

Na­tion­al Labor Re­la­tions Board Re­gion­al Dir­ect­or Peter Ohr sent shock waves through col­lege ath­let­ics in March when he ruled that North­west­ern Uni­versity’s schol­ar­ship foot­ball play­ers are em­ploy­ees of the school, and there­fore have the abil­ity to vote to uni­on­ize. Bal­lots from the res­ult­ing elec­tion have been im­poun­ded pending a North­west­ern ap­peal to the na­tion­al branch of the NLRB — an ap­peal that has re­ceived sup­port­ing briefs from the NCAA and sev­er­al oth­er ma­jor private uni­versit­ies with foot­ball pro­grams.

Last month, former UCLA bas­ket­ball play­er Ed O’Ban­non took the NCAA to tri­al in a case first filed in 2009, ar­guing that the NCAA had vi­ol­ated an­ti­trust law by pre­vent­ing ath­letes from re­ceiv­ing money for their like­ness, par­tic­u­larly in tele­vi­sion deals and video games. Em­mert test­i­fied in that tri­al in late June. A sim­il­ar law­suit filed by former Ari­zona State and Neb­raska quar­ter­back Sam Keller will go to tri­al next year.

Sen­ate Com­merce Com­mit­tee Chair­man Jay Rock­e­feller, D-W.Va., noted the le­gis­lat­ive branch’s im­port­ant but of­ten un­der­u­til­ized role in sports over­sight, as Con­gress looks for ways to get more in­volved in an is­sue that has seen little pro­gress des­pite sev­er­al dec­ades of cri­ti­cism.

But it re­mains un­clear how par­tis­an grid­lock could in­flu­ence po­ten­tial con­gres­sion­al ac­tion, as Re­pub­lic­ans have ex­pressed more skep­ti­cism in gov­ern­ment in­ter­ven­tion on the is­sue and tend to op­pose uni­on­iz­a­tion ef­forts in any in­dustry. 

“I can’t tell if you’re in charge or a min­ion” to the schools, said Sen. Claire Mc­Caskill. “If you’re merely a mon­et­ary pass-through, why should you ex­ist?”

Sen. Dan Coats, a Re­pub­lic­an from In­di­ana where the NCAA is headquartered, was one of few mem­bers of the com­mit­tee to ex­press any ad­mir­a­tion for Em­mert’s hand­ling of re­form ef­forts. And Rock­e­feller, who is re­tir­ing after this term, con­di­tion­ally prom­ised that the com­mit­tee would con­tin­ue to look in­to the is­sue — if his party keeps con­trol of the Sen­ate.

In re­sponse to tough ques­tion­ing, Em­mert made re­strained as­sur­ances that he would work with­in his au­thor­ity to push re­forms for the most glar­ing is­sues in the cur­rent sys­tem, in­clud­ing mul­ti­year schol­ar­ships, cost of at­tend­ance, ath­lete time de­mands, sti­pends for fam­ily travel to games, and health care cov­er­age. But he vehe­mently re­jec­ted the no­tion that stu­dent-ath­letes should be re­cog­nized as em­ploy­ees.

“The im­plic­a­tions of con­vert­ing a stu­dent-ath­lete mod­el to an em­ploy­er-em­ploy­ee mod­el would ut­terly trans­form col­lege sports in­to something that doesn’t be­gin to look like what it looks like today,” Em­mert said.

The wit­ness pan­el in­cluded former play­ers Myron Rolle and Devon Ram­say and his­tor­i­an Taylor Branch, whose 2011 At­lantic art­icle “The Shame of Col­lege Sports” helped bring wide­spread pub­lic at­ten­tion to the is­sue.

Sen. Claire Mc­Caskill, D-Mo., took the op­por­tun­ity to bring up her sexu­al-as­sault sur­vey re­port re­leased earli­er in the day, find­ing that more than 20 per­cent of Di­vi­sion I, II, and III col­leges al­low ath­let­ic de­part­ments to over­see sexu­al-as­sault al­leg­a­tions against ath­letes. Em­mert said he was “dis­mayed and sur­prised” by the find­ing and that it rep­res­en­ted an “enorm­ous” amount of con­flicts of in­terest. Earli­er in the hear­ing, Em­mert as­ser­ted that he lacks the au­thor­ity to make some of the re­forms to col­lege sports that he would ideally like to see, as col­lege pres­id­ents hold much of the power. But Mc­Caskill re­mained un­im­pressed.

“I can’t tell if you’re in charge or a min­ion” to the schools, Mc­Caskill said. “If you’re merely a mon­et­ary pass-through, why should you ex­ist?”

“Let me be very clear — it is ex­ploit­a­tion when you have an ath­lete work­ing 60, 70 hours a week, but yet still not able to af­ford the ba­sic ne­ces­sit­ies,” said Sen. Cory Book­er.

Sen. Cory Book­er, a former col­lege foot­ball play­er him­self at Stan­ford, was the most dir­ect of all in his cri­ti­cism of the NCAA’s struc­ture, say­ing the prob­lems today are the same as when he played over 20 years ago.

“Let me be very clear — it is ex­ploit­a­tion when you have an ath­lete work­ing 60, 70 hours a week, but yet still not able to af­ford the ba­sic ne­ces­sit­ies,” the New Jer­sey Demo­crat said, later adding, “We’ve seen the NCAA move quickly when money and repu­ta­tion is on the table. Where is the ur­gency?”

Em­mert could have pre­dicted the hos­tile wel­come in Wash­ing­ton. In May, three Demo­crat­ic mem­bers of the com­mit­tee — Rock­e­feller, Mc­Caskill, and Book­er — sent a let­ter to Em­mert in­dic­at­ing their con­cern over the NCAA’s struc­ture and gov­ernance of col­lege ath­let­ics. But Em­mert ex­pressed op­tim­ism for the fu­ture, de­scrib­ing the hear­ing as a “use­ful cattle prod.”

“It makes sure we know that the world is watch­ing, that the Sen­ate is watch­ing,” Em­mert said. “I be­lieve we will wind up in the right place in a couple of months. If we don’t, I’m sure we’ll have these con­ver­sa­tions again.”

These early hear­ings are likely just the be­gin­ning of in­creased con­gres­sion­al in­volve­ment in col­lege ath­let­ics, though spe­cif­ic in­ter­ven­tion or le­gis­la­tion re­mains off the table for now. In his clos­ing state­ments, Rock­e­feller cri­ti­cized the com­mit­tee for not mak­ing use of over­sight powers over the NCAA throughout the years, while Book­er sug­ges­ted an­oth­er hear­ing be held with “the real de­cision makers” — col­lege pres­id­ents.

What We're Following See More »
ANOTHER NUCLEAR OPTION?
Byrd Rule Could Trip Up Health Legislation
22 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"Even if House Republicans manage to get enough members of their party on board with the latest version of their health care bill, they will face another battle in the Senate: whether the bill complies with the chamber’s arcane ... Byrd rule, which stipulates all provisions in a reconciliation bill must affect federal spending and revenues in a way that is not merely incidental." Democrats should have the advantage in that fight, "unless the Senate pulls another 'nuclear option.'”

Source:
ONE WEEK
Senate Votes To Fund Government
1 days ago
BREAKING
ON TO SENATE
House Passes Spending Bill
1 days ago
BREAKING

The House has passed a one-week spending bill that will avert a government shutdown which was set to begin at midnight. Lawmakers now have an extra week to come to a longer agreement which is expected to fund the government through the end of the fiscal year in September. The legislation now goes to the Senate, where it is expected to pass before President Trump signs it.

PRESIDENT CALLS MEDICAID FUNDS A “BAILOUT”
Puerto Rico Another Sticking Point in Budget Talks
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

President Trump’s portrayal of an effort to funnel more Medicaid dollars to Puerto Rico as a "bailout" is complicating negotiations over a continuing resolution on the budget. "House Democrats are now requiring such assistance as a condition for supporting the continuing resolution," a position that the GOP leadership is amenable to. "But Mr. Trump’s apparent skepticism aligns him with conservative House Republicans inclined to view its request as a bailout, leaving the deal a narrow path to passage in Congress."

Source:
POTENTIAL GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN?
Democrats Threaten Spending Bill Over Obamacare
2 days ago
BREAKING

Democrats in the House are threatening to shut down the government if Republicans expedite a vote on a bill to repeal and replace Obamacare, said Democratic House Whip Steny Hoyer Thursday. Lawmakers have introduced a one-week spending bill to give themselves an extra week to reach a long-term funding deal, which seemed poised to pass easily. However, the White House is pressuring House Republicans to take a vote on their Obamacare replacement Friday to give Trump a legislative victory, though it is still not clear that they have the necessary votes to pass the health care bill. This could go down to the wire.

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login