Hobby Lobby Ally Invokes the ‘Chick-fil-A’ Defense

The 5-4 Supreme Court decision Monday was applauded by a wide swath of conservative politicians and groups.

National Journal
Matt Vasilogambros
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Matt Vasilogambros
June 30, 2014, 7:30 a.m.

As con­ser­vat­ives cel­eb­rated Hobby Lobby’s Su­preme Court vic­tory over Obama­care’s con­tra­cep­tion man­date, one group brought back a fa­mil­i­ar play­er in the battle over cor­por­a­tions’ re­li­gious ex­pres­sion: Chick-fil-A.

The Na­tion­al Cen­ter for Pub­lic Policy said in a state­ment the Court’s de­cision was “a vic­tory for free­dom,” and ref­er­enced the fast-food res­taur­ant to bol­ster its ar­gu­ment.

Chick-fil-A “for­goes sig­ni­fic­ant profit by clos­ing every Sunday for re­li­gious reas­ons, for ex­ample,” said Chair­man Amy Riden­our.  “If it were not pos­sible for a cor­por­a­tion to ex­er­cise re­li­gious be­liefs, Chik-Fil-A would be open on Sundays.”

Chick-fil-A’s prin­cip­al founder is a de­vout South­ern Baptist, and the res­taur­ant be­came the darling of the con­ser­vat­ive move­ment — and drew ire from the Left — after its CEO spoke out against leg­al­ized gay mar­riage.

The res­taur­ant ref­er­ence came among a chor­us of con­ser­vat­ive re­ac­tions to the 5-4 Su­preme Court rul­ing, which ex­empts cer­tain closely held com­pan­ies from the Af­ford­able Care Act’s con­tra­cep­tion man­date.

Re­pub­lic­an Na­tion­al Com­mit­tee Chair­man Re­ince Priebus:

This de­cision pro­tects the re­li­gious free­dom that is guar­an­teed to all Amer­ic­ans by the First Amend­ment, and we’re grate­ful the Court ruled on the side of liberty. The cent­ral is­sue of this case was wheth­er the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment can co­erce Amer­ic­ans to vi­ol­ate their deeply held re­li­gious be­liefs, and thank­fully the Court has up­held the prop­er lim­its on the gov­ern­ment’s power.

Sen­ate Minor­ity Lead­er Mitch Mc­Con­nell, R-Ky.

Today’s Su­preme Court de­cision makes clear that the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion can­not trample on the re­li­gious freedoms that Amer­ic­ans hold dear. Obama­care is the single worst piece of le­gis­la­tion to pass in the last 50 years, and I was glad to see the Su­preme Court agree that this par­tic­u­lar Obama­care man­date vi­ol­ates the Re­li­gious Free­dom Res­tor­a­tion Act (RFRA).

House Speak­er John Boehner

Today’s de­cision is a vic­tory for re­li­gious free­dom and an­oth­er de­feat for an ad­min­is­tra­tion that has re­peatedly crossed con­sti­tu­tion­al lines in pur­suit of its Big Gov­ern­ment ob­ject­ives.”¦ The pres­id­ent’s health care law re­mains an un­work­able mess and a drag on our eco­nomy.  We must re­peal it and en­act bet­ter solu­tions that start with lower­ing Amer­ic­ans’ health care costs.

Gov. Bobby Jin­dal, R-La.

The Court has made clear today that the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion’s as­sault on re­li­gious free­dom in this case went too far — but this as­sault will not stop, in our courts, in our schools, and in the halls of power. It will take be­liev­ers who are will­ing to risk their for­tunes and pub­lic ri­dicule and the mod­ern slings and ar­rows to stand up for what’s right.

 Rep. Michele Bach­mann, R-Minn.

I am ex­tremely en­cour­aged by today’s Su­preme Court de­cision to up­hold the re­li­gious liberty rights of the Green fam­ily of Hobby Lobby. At its core, today’s de­cision was about the right of in­di­vidu­al and fam­ily busi­ness own­ers to be free from gov­ern­ment man­dates that force them to deny their sin­cerely-held re­li­gious be­liefs. Amer­ica was foun­ded on the prin­ciple of re­li­gious free­dom, and there is noth­ing more fun­da­ment­al than the First Amend­ment. This de­cision rep­res­ents a tre­mend­ous vic­tory for the ba­sic con­sti­tu­tion­al rights of every Amer­ic­an.

Sen. John Thune, R-S.D.

Today’s de­cision is a vic­tory for re­li­gious free­dom. Re­li­gious free­dom is one of our most ba­sic prin­ciples and the very first right men­tioned in the Bill of Rights. I am pleased that the Su­preme Court has re­jec­ted the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion’s at­tempt to lim­it this most fun­da­ment­al of Amer­ic­an liber­ties.

Fam­ily Re­search Coun­cil

The Su­preme Court has de­livered one of the most sig­ni­fic­ant vic­tor­ies for re­li­gious free­dom in our gen­er­a­tion. We are thank­ful the Su­preme Court agreed that the gov­ern­ment went too far by man­dat­ing that fam­ily busi­nesses own­ers must vi­ol­ate their con­sciences un­der threat of crip­pling fines.

In­de­pend­ent Law Cen­ter

This case isn’t simply about con­tra­cep­tion. In­stead, if gov­ern­ment could have forced Amer­ic­ans to vi­ol­ate their most deeply held con­vic­tions, no Amer­ic­an, whatever their con­vic­tions, would have been free.”

The In­de­pend­ent Wo­men’s For­um

The HHS man­date is bad policy. It comes with un­in­ten­ded con­sequences for wo­men and for pub­lic health. By re­mov­ing price com­pet­i­tion from birth con­trol mar­kets, the man­date would have driv­en up the cost of drugs for wo­men who re­main un­in­sured, and may have dis­cour­aged con­dom use among those who are in­sured. We are thank­ful that the Court ruled today that closely-held cor­por­a­tions will not be re­quired to fol­low this mis­guided policy. 

South­ern Evan­gel­ic­al Sem­in­ary

This is a land­mark case that will have his­tor­ic­al sig­ni­fic­ance for dec­ades to come, and Chris­ti­an busi­ness own­ers as well as oth­ers of all re­li­gious faith can feel se­cure that they can run their busi­nesses with their faith at the cen­ter of all de­cisions, rather than sep­ar­at­ing their faith from their busi­ness prac­tices and policies be­cause the gov­ern­ment tells them they must act counter to their core re­li­gious con­vic­tions.”

What We're Following See More »
SO HE CAN MEET WITH HIS FORMER FOX COLLEAGUES
Bill Shine Excused from Some Ethics Laws
11 hours ago
THE DETAILS
ANDREW MILLER IS AN AIDE TO ROGER STONE
Judge Holds Witness in Contempt in Manafort Case
3 days ago
THE LATEST

"A federal judge has found a witness in contempt for refusing to testify before the grand jury hearing evidence in special counsel Robert S. Mueller III’s investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election. U.S. District Chief Judge Beryl Howell made the ruling Friday after a sealed hearing to discuss Andrew Miller’s refusal to appear before the grand jury. Miller is a former aide to longtime Trump confidant Roger Stone."

Source:
TAX FRAUD, FAILURE TO REGISTER
Gates Says He Committed Crimes with Manafort
1 weeks ago
THE LATEST

Paul Manafort's former business partner Rick Gates said in court today that "he conspired with Manafort to falsify Manafort’s tax returns. Gates said he and Manafort knowingly failed to report foreign bank accounts and had failed to register Manafort as a foreign agent."

Source:
Gates to Be Called Next in Manafort Case
1 weeks ago
THE LATEST
DEFENSE BLAMES GATES
Prosecutors: $15,000 Ostrich Coat Emblematic of Manafort Lifestyle
1 weeks ago
THE LATEST

On the first day of Paul Manafort's trial Tuesday, prosecutors accused "Manafort of failing to pay taxes on millions of dollars he earned working for a pro-Russia political candidate in Ukraine and using the money to fund a lavish lifestyle, including purchasing a $15,000 jacket 'made from an ostrich.' Manafort’s defense sought to place the blame on his former business partner, Richard Gates, who they said embezzled money from Manafort."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login