Former Soviet Nuclear Test Site Still Holds Mysteries

None

Rachel Oswald, Global Security Newswire
See more stories about...
Rachel Oswald, Global Security Newswire
Aug. 15, 2013, 9:02 a.m.

SE­MEY, Kaza­kh­stan — The nuc­le­ar test­ing ground of the former So­viet Uni­on is a vast, bar­ren area close to the size of Lake Ontario that con­tin­ues to hold some amount of se­cur­ity risk.

Dur­ing the Cold War, hun­dreds of at­mo­spher­ic and un­der­ground atom­ic weapons tests were con­duc­ted here at the Semi­p­al­at­insk Test Site in north­east­ern Kaza­kh­stan, near the Rus­si­an bor­der.

Nuc­le­ar ex­plo­sions dec­ades ago at the test site left be­hind con­sid­er­able sens­it­ive ma­ter­i­al that Kaza­kh­stan, Rus­sia and the United States have worked to­geth­er for years to se­cure.

Last fall, the three na­tions com­pleted activ­ity on a joint pro­ject that sealed a num­ber of tun­nels in Degel­en Moun­tain at the south­ern end of the ex­per­i­ment­al range, where So­viet un­der­ground nuc­le­ar weapons tests were con­duc­ted dur­ing the Cold War.

Des­pite the suc­cess of that pro­ject, a real like­li­hood ex­ists that more nuc­le­ar ma­ter­i­al re­mains out there, bur­ied be­neath the soil of the Semi­p­al­at­insk steppe, un­se­cured and po­ten­tially vul­ner­able to theft, ac­cord­ing to Sergey Lukashen­ko, dir­ect­or of the In­sti­tute of Ra­di­ation Safety and Eco­logy at Kaza­kh­stan’s Na­tion­al Nuc­le­ar Cen­ter.

It is not clear wheth­er au­thor­it­ies know ex­actly where the sub­stances are loc­ated and in what amounts and con­di­tions.

Kaza­kh­stani gov­ern­ment of­fi­cials and is­sue ex­perts say that any ma­ter­i­al still left un­ac­coun­ted likely stops far short of pos­ing the kind of nuc­le­ar ter­ror­ism risk that the plutoni­um, left be­hind in the tun­nels of Degel­en Moun­tain, did.

Still, Sergei Berez­in, the deputy dir­ect­or gen­er­al of the Na­tion­al Nuc­le­ar Cen­ter, which man­ages Semi­p­al­at­insk, last week told a group of vis­it­ing U.S. journ­al­ists “it is pos­sible” that there might still be sens­it­ive nuc­le­ar ma­ter­i­al at the former test site.

The Kaza­kh­stani gov­ern­ment in As­tana is dis­cuss­ing with Mo­scow what it knows about any nuc­le­ar ex­per­i­ments that might have been con­duc­ted by the So­viet Uni­on at vari­ous points around Semi­p­al­at­insk, an area of roughly 7,000 square miles.

“We’ve been hold­ing con­sulta­tions with the Rus­si­an gov­ern­ment. It’s an on­go­ing ne­go­ti­ation,” Berez­in said through a trans­lat­or.

“The prob­lem is even Rus­si­ans, they don’t have very ex­act in­form­a­tion about events that happened in the 1950s,” Lukashen­ko said.

Lukashen­ko is lead­ing a team of sci­ent­ists that spends stretches of time liv­ing in camps at Semi­p­al­at­insk — also known as “the Poly­gon,” due to its shape — while they con­duct re­search in­to the linger­ing en­vir­on­ment­al im­pacts of ra­di­ation pro­duced by the nuc­le­ar tests and search for areas of un­usu­ally high ra­dio­activ­ity that can sig­nal the pres­ence of un­ac­coun­ted nuc­le­ar ma­ter­i­al.

Un­der the So­viet Uni­on, de­tails about in­di­vidu­al weapons tests — as well as atom­ic en­ergy safety ex­per­i­ments that em­ployed nuc­le­ar ma­ter­i­als — were kept secret by dif­fer­ent min­is­tries, ac­cord­ing to Lukashen­ko.

“One de­part­ment didn’t know what the oth­er de­part­ment [was] do­ing and only a few people who planned [the] ex­per­i­ment, who in­ven­ted [the] ex­per­i­ment, knew everything,” he told U.S. re­port­ers, whose travel to Kaza­kh­stan was or­gan­ized by the In­ter­na­tion­al Re­port­ing Pro­ject.

The So­vi­ets were un­der­stood to have spotty re­cord-keep­ing, mak­ing it pos­sible that there is yet more sens­it­ive ma­ter­i­al to be found at the test site. There is little in­dic­a­tion that Rus­sia has with­held rel­ev­ant in­form­a­tion, but rather Mo­scow could simply lack re­li­able data that might be passed along to Wash­ing­ton or As­tana.

The Na­tion­al Nuc­le­ar Cen­ter has be­gun a com­pre­hens­ive sur­vey of the Semi­p­al­at­insk Ex­per­i­ment­al Field, the area where most of the at­mo­spher­ic tests took place.

Based on con­cerns that bad act­ors might seek to gath­er up large amounts of con­tam­in­ated dirt in or­der to ex­tract the plutoni­um con­tained with­in it and use it to build a weapon, the cen­ter is doc­u­ment­ing levels of the chem­ic­al ele­ment in the soil over an area about 125 square miles.

“There are some places with high con­cen­tra­tions of plutoni­um,” Lukashen­ko said.

Still, he thinks it would be very dif­fi­cult for the plutoni­um to be fash­ioned in­to a nuc­le­ar bomb.

“To ex­tract a sig­ni­fic­ant amount of plutoni­um, you have to treat tons of soil, hun­dreds of tons,” Lukashen­ko said.

One would also need ac­cess to spe­cial­ized equip­ment and know­ledge of spe­cif­ic chem­ic­al pro­cesses for re­mov­ing the plutoni­um from the soil, “but it’s pos­sible in prin­ciple” to ex­tract the fis­sile ma­ter­i­al, he said.

Less tech­nic­ally ar­du­ous would be us­ing the soil to con­struct a ra­di­olo­gic­al “dirty bomb.” Kaza­kh­stan and the United States pre­vi­ously worked to­geth­er to pave over a dif­fer­ent sec­tion of Semi­p­al­at­insk con­tain­ing a large amount of plutoni­um-filled soil that was judged to pose a dirty-bomb threat.

Lukashen­ko said he sup­ports cart­ing away all of the heav­ily con­tam­in­ated soil at the Ex­per­i­ment­al Field, which he es­tim­ated might con­tain enough plutoni­um to pro­duce one or per­haps even two bombs.

Presently, the U.S. and Kaza­kh­stani gov­ern­ments are dis­cuss­ing the para­met­ers of a pro­ject that would gath­er up all of the highly con­tam­in­ated soil and trans­fer it to a tun­nel in Degel­en Moun­tain that would then be sealed. Wash­ing­ton is un­der­stood to be will­ing to fund the work.

Both gov­ern­ments de­clined to dis­cuss spe­cif­ics about the con­sulta­tions, in­clud­ing when the pro­ject might get un­der way, due to the sens­it­ive nature of the work.

While Degel­en Moun­tain is kept un­der sur­veil­lance by Kaza­kh­stani troops — as well as by sensors and drones provided by the United States — the rest of Semi­p­al­at­insk is left fairly un­pro­tec­ted, ac­cord­ing to Dmitriy Kalmykov, dir­ect­or of the Eco-Mu­seum in the city of Karaganda, south of As­tana.

Kalmykov’s or­gan­iz­a­tion es­tim­ates that a few thou­sand people ac­tu­ally live on the Poly­gon. Cattle are free to graze on the land and cars come and go.

Pri­or to the start of the Ex­per­i­ment­al Field sur­vey, Rus­sia in­dic­ated it did not ex­pect the study would turn up any­thing un­usu­al, Lukashen­ko said.

“When we start this very de­tailed sur­vey of [the] Ex­per­i­ment­al Field, Rus­sia changes their opin­ion. Be­fore they said ‘No, it’s noth­ing in­ter­est­ing for us.’ Now, they change a little bit,” the ra­di­ation in­sti­tute dir­ect­or said with a chuckle. “They said, ‘We are afraid you will find something.’”

He ad­ded: “They are just afraid that maybe some­body from their or­gan­iz­a­tion made something” in the early 1950s that “nobody knows [about] and if we try to dig up something, we will find [it].”

Just with­in the past year, Lukashen­ko’s team found a frag­ment of a spe­cial al­loy that con­tains a very unique com­pos­i­tion of en­riched urani­um, nick­el and iron. The al­loy was found bur­ied about three feet deep in the Ex­per­i­ment­al Field.

“I don’t un­der­stand for what they pro­duced this ma­ter­i­al,” Lukashen­ko said, adding that much nuc­le­ar re­search per­formed at Semi­p­al­at­insk six dec­ades ago went bey­ond just weapons test­ing. “Nobody knows for what they pro­duced this al­loy.”

It’s dis­cov­er­ies like these that Lukashen­ko said led former Los Alam­os Na­tion­al Labor­at­ory Dir­ect­or Siegfried Heck­er to dub him and his team “nuc­le­ar ar­che­olo­gists.”

What We're Following See More »
A DARK CLOUD OVER TRUMP?
Snowstorm Could Impact Primary Turnout
2 days ago
THE LATEST

A snowstorm is supposed to hit New Hampshire today and “linger into Primary Tuesday.” GOP consultant Ron Kaufman said lower turnout should help candidates who have spent a lot of time in the state tending to retail politicking. Donald Trump “has acknowledged that he needs to step up his ground-game, and a heavy snowfall could depress his figures relative to more organized candidates.”

Source:
IN CASE OF EMERGENCY
A Shake-Up in the Offing in the Clinton Camp?
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

Anticipating a primary loss in New Hampshire on Tuesday, Hillary and Bill Clinton “are considering staffing and strategy changes” to their campaign. Sources tell Politico that the Clintons are likely to layer over top officials with experienced talent, rather than fire their staff en masse.

Source:
THE LAST ROUND OF NEW HAMPSHIRE POLLS
Trump Is Still Ahead, but Who’s in Second?
1 days ago
THE LATEST

We may not be talking about New Hampshire primary polls for another three-and-a-half years, so here goes:

  • American Research Group’s tracking poll has Donald Trump in the lead with 30% support, followed by Marco Rubio and John Kasich tying for second place at 16%. On the Democratic side, Bernie Sanders leads Hillary Clinton 53%-41%.
  • The 7 News/UMass Lowell tracking poll has Trump way out front with 34%, followed by Rubio and Ted Cruz with 13% apiece. Among the Democrats, Sanders is in front 56%-40%.
  • A Gravis poll puts Trump ahead with 28%, followed by Kasich with 17% and Rubio with 15%.
IT’S ALL ABOUT SECOND PLACE
CNN Calls the Primary for Sanders and Trump
1 days ago
THE LATEST

Well that didn’t take long. CNN has already declared Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump the winners of the New Hampshire primary, leaving the rest of the candidates to fight for the scraps. Five minutes later, the Associated Press echoed CNN’s call.

Source:
×