Tax Reform Faces Long Odds Even With Dave Camp at the Helm

A key player won’t be distracted by a Senate race, but that isn’t enough in itself to change the odds.

In this photo taken July 8, 2013, Senate Finance Committee Chairman Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., left, and the House Ways and Means Committee Chairman, Rep. Dave Camp, R-Mich., talk about tax reform to 3M employees at the 3M Innovation Center in Maplewood, Minn. Two of the most powerful members of Congress, Baucus, a Democrat, and Camp, a Republican, are touring the country to rally support for their effort to overhaul the nationís tax laws. They've developed a close friendship as they work to attract other lawmakers to their cause while helping Democrats and Republicans get to know each other a bit better. Their secret weapon: burgers and beer.
National Journal
Nancy Cook
Aug. 17, 2013, 2 a.m.

Tax re­form re­mains a long shot this fall — just as it al­ways was be­fore, dur­ing, and after Re­pub­lic­an Rep. Dave Camp flir­ted with a run for a U.S. Sen­ate seat.

The House Ways and Means Com­mit­tee chair­man an­nounced Fri­day that he would not run for the Michigan Sen­ate seat, and im­me­di­ately, the ques­tion arose: What, if any­thing, does it mean for tax re­form this fall if Camp does not have to de­vote ma­jor time to cam­paign­ing?

Not as much as you might think. Tax re­form faced many, many hurdles re­gard­less of the dir­ec­tion of Camp’s fu­ture polit­ic­al ca­reer. Here are a few to think on:

Rev­en­ue: Neither party can agree on how much money any over­haul of the tax sys­tem should raise. Demo­crats want to raise ad­di­tion­al rev­en­ue to either fund stim­u­lus-like pro­grams or to pay down the de­fi­cit. Re­pub­lic­ans think tax re­form should not raise any more money than the code cur­rently does. For­get find­ing a com­prom­ise on a lower cor­por­ate tax rate between the two parties. This is a ma­jor philo­soph­ic­al stick­ing point and one of the biggest im­ped­i­ments.

Little sup­port from lead­er­ship: Re­pub­lic­an House Speak­er John Boehner has said that he has re­served a bill spe­cific­ally for tax re­form; that’s a nice sym­bol­ic ges­ture to sup­port his old friend Camp. But Boehner is not ex­actly out there selling any spe­cif­ic tax plan to elim­in­ate tax de­duc­tions or clean up the code.

The Sen­ate lead­er­ship ex­presses even less en­thu­si­asm. Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id re­fused to par­ti­cip­ate in the Sen­ate’s top tax writers’ ex­er­cise to ex­am­ine the tax code. (The Sen­ate Fin­ance Com­mit­tee lead­ers had asked law­makers to de­fend their fa­vor­ite tax breaks in private let­ters, but Re­id re­fused to play along and pub­licly dissed the pro­cess to re­port­ers). A num­ber of top Sen­ate Re­pub­lic­ans sim­il­arly urged their mem­bers to not even wade in­to tax re­form un­til the rev­en­ue ques­tion (see above) was settled.

House Demo­crats: Camp has prom­ised to un­veil a tax re­form bill with­in the Ways and Means Com­mit­tee this fall, but it will be hard to make that ap­pear broadly pal­at­able un­less some House Demo­crats on the com­mit­tee sup­port it. Tax lob­by­ists in town are closely watch­ing this pro­cess of court­ing House Demo­crats. So far, none have pub­licly signaled their sup­port for a Camp bill. If they don’t, this eas­ily could look like a par­tis­an Re­pub­lic­an ex­er­cise — an­oth­er pos­sible killer of tax re­form.

Risk to the GOP: And, if few or no House Demo­crats sup­port Camp’s tax re­form draft le­gis­la­tion, then the Re­pub­lic­ans run a ma­jor polit­ic­al risk. If they pro­pose, for in­stance, cut­ting the cor­por­ate tax rate and pay­ing for it by slash­ing some tax de­duc­tions near and dear to Amer­ic­ans, then they’ll look like friends to ma­jor cor­por­a­tions and wealthy people. That play­book did not work well for Mitt Rom­ney, when the Demo­crats used it against him in last year’s pres­id­en­tial cam­paign.

Add all of this up and it re­in­forces the polit­ic­al dif­fi­culty of passing a ma­jor tax-re­form pack­age in the next year or two, even with all the time and at­ten­tion Camp can now af­ford to lav­ish on the pro­ject.

What We're Following See More »
WEST WING REDUX
Allison Janney Takes to the Real White House Podium
7 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Carolyn Kaster/AP

STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
8 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
9 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
10 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
13 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
×