Tax reform remains a long shot this fall — just as it always was before, during, and after Republican Rep. Dave Camp flirted with a run for a U.S. Senate seat.
The House Ways and Means Committee chairman announced Friday that he would not run for the Michigan Senate seat, and immediately, the question arose: What, if anything, does it mean for tax reform this fall if Camp does not have to devote major time to campaigning?
Not as much as you might think. Tax reform faced many, many hurdles regardless of the direction of Camp’s future political career. Here are a few to think on:
Revenue: Neither party can agree on how much money any overhaul of the tax system should raise. Democrats want to raise additional revenue to either fund stimulus-like programs or to pay down the deficit. Republicans think tax reform should not raise any more money than the code currently does. Forget finding a compromise on a lower corporate tax rate between the two parties. This is a major philosophical sticking point and one of the biggest impediments.
Little support from leadership: Republican House Speaker John Boehner has said that he has reserved a bill specifically for tax reform; that’s a nice symbolic gesture to support his old friend Camp. But Boehner is not exactly out there selling any specific tax plan to eliminate tax deductions or clean up the code.
The Senate leadership expresses even less enthusiasm. Majority Leader Harry Reid refused to participate in the Senate’s top tax writers’ exercise to examine the tax code. (The Senate Finance Committee leaders had asked lawmakers to defend their favorite tax breaks in private letters, but Reid refused to play along and publicly dissed the process to reporters). A number of top Senate Republicans similarly urged their members to not even wade into tax reform until the revenue question (see above) was settled.
House Democrats: Camp has promised to unveil a tax reform bill within the Ways and Means Committee this fall, but it will be hard to make that appear broadly palatable unless some House Democrats on the committee support it. Tax lobbyists in town are closely watching this process of courting House Democrats. So far, none have publicly signaled their support for a Camp bill. If they don’t, this easily could look like a partisan Republican exercise — another possible killer of tax reform.
Risk to the GOP: And, if few or no House Democrats support Camp’s tax reform draft legislation, then the Republicans run a major political risk. If they propose, for instance, cutting the corporate tax rate and paying for it by slashing some tax deductions near and dear to Americans, then they’ll look like friends to major corporations and wealthy people. That playbook did not work well for Mitt Romney, when the Democrats used it against him in last year’s presidential campaign.
Add all of this up and it reinforces the political difficulty of passing a major tax-reform package in the next year or two, even with all the time and attention Camp can now afford to lavish on the project.
What We're Following See More »
Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.
Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”
Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."
In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-expected primary battle behind her, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton (D) is no longer going on the air in upcoming primary states. “Team Clinton hasn’t spent a single cent in … California, Indiana, Kentucky, Oregon and West Virginia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “campaign has spent a little more than $1 million in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone backer in the Senate, said the candidate should end his presidential campaign if he’s losing to Hillary Clinton after the primary season concludes in June, breaking sharply with the candidate who is vowing to take his insurgent bid to the party convention in Philadelphia.”