Tax Reform Faces Long Odds Even With Dave Camp at the Helm

A key player won’t be distracted by a Senate race, but that isn’t enough in itself to change the odds.

In this photo taken July 8, 2013, Senate Finance Committee Chairman Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., left, and the House Ways and Means Committee Chairman, Rep. Dave Camp, R-Mich., talk about tax reform to 3M employees at the 3M Innovation Center in Maplewood, Minn. Two of the most powerful members of Congress, Baucus, a Democrat, and Camp, a Republican, are touring the country to rally support for their effort to overhaul the nationís tax laws. They've developed a close friendship as they work to attract other lawmakers to their cause while helping Democrats and Republicans get to know each other a bit better. Their secret weapon: burgers and beer.
National Journal
Nancy Cook
Aug. 17, 2013, 2 a.m.

Tax re­form re­mains a long shot this fall — just as it al­ways was be­fore, dur­ing, and after Re­pub­lic­an Rep. Dave Camp flir­ted with a run for a U.S. Sen­ate seat.

The House Ways and Means Com­mit­tee chair­man an­nounced Fri­day that he would not run for the Michigan Sen­ate seat, and im­me­di­ately, the ques­tion arose: What, if any­thing, does it mean for tax re­form this fall if Camp does not have to de­vote ma­jor time to cam­paign­ing?

Not as much as you might think. Tax re­form faced many, many hurdles re­gard­less of the dir­ec­tion of Camp’s fu­ture polit­ic­al ca­reer. Here are a few to think on:

Rev­en­ue: Neither party can agree on how much money any over­haul of the tax sys­tem should raise. Demo­crats want to raise ad­di­tion­al rev­en­ue to either fund stim­u­lus-like pro­grams or to pay down the de­fi­cit. Re­pub­lic­ans think tax re­form should not raise any more money than the code cur­rently does. For­get find­ing a com­prom­ise on a lower cor­por­ate tax rate between the two parties. This is a ma­jor philo­soph­ic­al stick­ing point and one of the biggest im­ped­i­ments.

Little sup­port from lead­er­ship: Re­pub­lic­an House Speak­er John Boehner has said that he has re­served a bill spe­cific­ally for tax re­form; that’s a nice sym­bol­ic ges­ture to sup­port his old friend Camp. But Boehner is not ex­actly out there selling any spe­cif­ic tax plan to elim­in­ate tax de­duc­tions or clean up the code.

The Sen­ate lead­er­ship ex­presses even less en­thu­si­asm. Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id re­fused to par­ti­cip­ate in the Sen­ate’s top tax writers’ ex­er­cise to ex­am­ine the tax code. (The Sen­ate Fin­ance Com­mit­tee lead­ers had asked law­makers to de­fend their fa­vor­ite tax breaks in private let­ters, but Re­id re­fused to play along and pub­licly dissed the pro­cess to re­port­ers). A num­ber of top Sen­ate Re­pub­lic­ans sim­il­arly urged their mem­bers to not even wade in­to tax re­form un­til the rev­en­ue ques­tion (see above) was settled.

House Demo­crats: Camp has prom­ised to un­veil a tax re­form bill with­in the Ways and Means Com­mit­tee this fall, but it will be hard to make that ap­pear broadly pal­at­able un­less some House Demo­crats on the com­mit­tee sup­port it. Tax lob­by­ists in town are closely watch­ing this pro­cess of court­ing House Demo­crats. So far, none have pub­licly signaled their sup­port for a Camp bill. If they don’t, this eas­ily could look like a par­tis­an Re­pub­lic­an ex­er­cise — an­oth­er pos­sible killer of tax re­form.

Risk to the GOP: And, if few or no House Demo­crats sup­port Camp’s tax re­form draft le­gis­la­tion, then the Re­pub­lic­ans run a ma­jor polit­ic­al risk. If they pro­pose, for in­stance, cut­ting the cor­por­ate tax rate and pay­ing for it by slash­ing some tax de­duc­tions near and dear to Amer­ic­ans, then they’ll look like friends to ma­jor cor­por­a­tions and wealthy people. That play­book did not work well for Mitt Rom­ney, when the Demo­crats used it against him in last year’s pres­id­en­tial cam­paign.

Add all of this up and it re­in­forces the polit­ic­al dif­fi­culty of passing a ma­jor tax-re­form pack­age in the next year or two, even with all the time and at­ten­tion Camp can now af­ford to lav­ish on the pro­ject.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Maher Weighs in on Bernie, Trump and Palin
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.

Source:
×