House GOP Plans Mega-Hearing on Climate Change

House subcommittee on Energy and Power Chairman Rep. Ed Whitfield, R-Ky., presides over a hearing on the "Energy Tax Prevention Act of 2011, Wednesday, Feb. 9, 2011, on Capitol Hill in Washington. (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta)  
National Journal
Amy Harder
Aug. 21, 2013, 3 p.m.

After vir­tu­ally ig­nor­ing the na­tion’s biggest en­vir­on­ment­al is­sue for years, Re­pub­lic­an lead­ers of the House En­ergy and Com­merce Com­mit­tee are plan­ning a ma­jor hear­ing on cli­mate change on Sept. 18 and are in­vit­ing lead­ers of 13 fed­er­al agen­cies to testi­fy. It will be the first time since Pres­id­ent Obama un­veiled his cli­mate ac­tion plan in June that ad­min­is­tra­tion of­fi­cials will testi­fy on Cap­it­ol Hill about the agenda.

En­ergy and Power Sub­com­mit­tee Chair­man Ed Whit­field, R-Ky., who will preside over the hear­ing, sent out let­ters Aug. 6 in­vit­ing testi­mony from lead­ers of the En­vir­on­ment­al Pro­tec­tion Agency; the de­part­ments of Ag­ri­cul­ture, De­fense, En­ergy, Health and Hu­man Ser­vices, In­teri­or, State, and Trans­port­a­tion; the Na­tion­al Ocean­ic and At­mo­spher­ic Ad­min­is­tra­tion in the Com­merce De­part­ment; NASA; the U.S. Agency for In­ter­na­tion­al De­vel­op­ment; the Ex­port-Im­port Bank; and the White House Of­fice of Sci­ence and Tech­no­logy.

In the let­ters, Whit­field asks nine ques­tions about how each agency de­votes its time, money, and re­sources to cli­mate-change policies and re­quests each of­fi­cial to in­clude an­swers in his or her writ­ten testi­mony at the hear­ing. The sub­com­mit­tee had asked the agen­cies to re­spond by Wed­nes­day about who will testi­fy. By press time Wed­nes­day even­ing, only the De­fense De­part­ment had con­firmed it will provide a wit­ness, al­though a Pentagon spokes­per­son was not able to provide the name. The sub­com­mit­tee ex­pects to con­firm more wit­nesses in the com­ing days.

If it provides a wit­ness, EPA will likely be the star of the hear­ing. Ad­min­is­trat­or Gina Mc­Carthy had not con­firmed by Wed­nes­day even­ing wheth­er she or someone on her be­half would testi­fy. EPA reg­u­la­tions are the center­piece of Obama’s cli­mate plan, and by the time the hear­ing oc­curs in mid-Septem­ber, EPA should be just days away from an­noun­cing draft rules for con­trolling green­house-gas emis­sions from new power plants. When Obama an­nounced his cli­mate plan in June, he gave EPA a Sept. 20 dead­line to an­nounce these reg­u­la­tions, which will be re­pur­posed from ones the agency ini­tially pro­posed last year.

The hear­ing, en­titled “The Obama Ad­min­is­tra­tion’s Cli­mate Change Policies and Activ­it­ies,” will touch on the sci­ence un­der­pin­ning glob­al cli­mate change. A draft of a ma­jor United Na­tions re­port leaked to Re­u­ters earli­er this week showed that the pan­el of sci­entif­ic ex­perts writ­ing the U.N.’s In­ter­gov­ern­ment­al Pan­el on Cli­mate Change re­port is at least 95 per­cent cer­tain that hu­man activ­ity — primar­ily burn­ing of fossil fuels — is the biggest cause of glob­al warm­ing since the 1950s. The IP­CC is the primary guide coun­tries use when de­cid­ing how to con­front cli­mate change.

“The idea is to fo­cus it on the ad­min­is­tra­tion’s cli­mate-change policy; ob­vi­ously sci­ence is an in­teg­ral part of that,” said a Re­pub­lic­an com­mit­tee aide, who ad­ded that it will be “quite a pro­duc­tion” cov­er­ing a wide ar­ray of is­sues re­lated to cli­mate change.

Over the past two years, House En­ergy and Com­merce Chair­man Fred Up­ton, R-Mich., and Whit­field have ig­nored nu­mer­ous let­ters from En­ergy and Com­merce rank­ing mem­ber Henry Wax­man, D-Cal­if., and En­ergy and Power Sub­com­mit­tee rank­ing mem­ber Bobby Rush, D-Ill., re­quest­ing a hear­ing on cli­mate change and the latest sci­ence sur­round­ing the is­sue. In the last Con­gress, the two Demo­crats sent 21 let­ters, ac­cord­ing to their count. Up­ton and Whit­field re­spon­ded to just one of those re­quests, in March of this year.

“We ab­so­lutely should hear from Ad­min­is­tra­tion wit­nesses about the threat of cli­mate change,” Wax­man said in a state­ment to Na­tion­al Journ­al Daily. “We also should be hear­ing from the na­tion’s lead­ing sci­ent­ists. Ever since the Re­pub­lic­ans took over, the Com­mit­tee has been AWOL on the biggest en­ergy is­sue fa­cing the na­tion. It’s an em­bar­rass­ing re­cord that needs to change.”

The agency heads the sub­com­mit­tee has re­ques­ted to testi­fy are: Mc­Carthy; En­ergy Sec­ret­ary Ern­est Mon­iz; HHS Sec­ret­ary Kath­leen Se­beli­us; Ag­ri­cul­ture Sec­ret­ary Tom Vil­sack; Trans­port­a­tion Sec­ret­ary An­thony Foxx; In­teri­or Sec­ret­ary Sally Jew­ell; De­fense Sec­ret­ary Chuck Hagel; Sec­ret­ary of State John Kerry; USAID Ad­min­is­trat­or Rajiv Shah; Ex­port-Im­port Bank Chair­man and Pres­id­ent Fred Hoch­berg; White House Sci­ence and Tech­no­logy Dir­ect­or John Hold­ren; NOAA Ad­min­is­trat­or Kath­ryn Sul­li­van; and NASA Ad­min­is­trat­or Charles Bolden Jr.

What We're Following See More »
27TH AMENDMENT
Congress Can’t Seem Not to Pay Itself
28 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

Rep. Dave Young can't even refuse his own paycheck. The Iowa Republican is trying to make a point that if Congress can't pass a budget (it's already missed the April 15 deadline) then it shouldn't be paid. But, he's been informed, the 27th Amendment prohibits him from refusing his own pay. "Young’s efforts to dock his own pay, however, are duck soup compared to his larger goal: docking the pay of every lawmaker when Congress drops the budget ball." His bill to stiff his colleagues has only mustered the support of three of them. Another bill, sponsored by Rep. Jim Cooper (D-TN), has about three dozen co-sponsors.

Source:
THE QUESTION
How Far Away from Cleveland is the California GOP Staying?
1 hours ago
THE ANSWER

Sixty miles away, in Sandusky, Ohio. "We're pretty bitter about that," said Harmeet Dhillon, vice chairwoman of the California Republican Party. "It sucks to be California, we're like the ugly stepchild. They need us for our cash and our donors, they don't need us for anything else."

ATTORNEY MAY RELEASE THEM ANYWAY
SCOTUS Will Not Allow ‘DC Madam’ Phone Records to Be Released
1 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Anyone looking forward to seeing some boldfaced names on the client list of the late Deborah Jeane Palfrey, the "DC Madam," will have to wait a little longer. "The Supreme Court announced Monday it would not intervene to allow" the release of her phone records, "despite one of her former attorneys claiming the records are “very relevant” to the presidential election. Though he has repeatedly threatened to release the records if courts do not modify a 2007 restraining order, Montgomery Blair Sibley tells U.S. News he’s not quite sure what he now will do."

Source:
DOWN TO THE WIRE
Sanders Looks to Right the Ship in Indiana
17 hours ago
THE LATEST

Hillary Clinton may have the Democratic nomination sewn up, but Bernie Sanders apparently isn't buying it. Buoyed by a poll showing them in a "virtual tie," Sanders is "holding three rallies on the final day before the state primary and hoping to pull off a win after a tough week of election losses and campaign layoffs." 

Source:
‘SPOOKED’ IN NORTH DAKOTA
Cruz Delegates Having Second Thoughts?
21 hours ago
THE LATEST

As unbound delegates pledged to Ted Cruz watch him "struggle to tread water in a primary increasingly dominated by Trump, many of them, wary of a bitter convention battle that could rend the party at its seams, are rethinking their commitment to the Texas senator."

Source:
×