WASHINGTON — New Mexico’s two Democratic U.S. senators differ over plans to run a power transmission line through White Sands Missile Range test areas.
Junior U.S. Sen. Martin Heinrich strongly backs development of the line as “vital” to the state’s economy. Sen. Tom Udall, meanwhile, has urged presidential intervention to resolve differences between the Defense Department, which opposes the plan, and the Bureau of Land Management, which selected the route.
In an Aug. 19 letter to Interior Department Secretary Sally Jewell, Heinrich blasted the Pentagon for its continued delay of the project by first agreeing to and then backing off proposed routes for the line across the missile range.
BLM has since 2009 overseen the right-of-way process for the $1.5 billion, 515 mile, 500 kV transmission line planned by SunZia LLC to link wind-power generating sites in rural New Mexico with Arizona. On June 14, the bureau selected a route that crosses the northern extension of the missile range — a route opposed by the Pentagon on national security grounds because it would interfere with missile tests.
Heinrich told Jewell that successful development of transmission projects like SunZia’s are vital to the state’s economy and job creation.
SunZia has positioned its proposed line as a way to transmit “green” energy generated by wind turbines in rural, eastern New Mexico to urban markets in Arizona and possibly California. Heinrich agreed: “The SunZia transmission line will help deliver wind and solar energy generated in New Mexico to the major western energy demand centers,” he said. “Without access to those markets, New Mexico’s renewable energy resources will remain isolated and largely untapped.”
Heinrich said Defense first agreed to a route across the missile range in May 2011, then later asked BLM to push the line further north. This month the Pentagon suggested SunZia bury 35 miles of the line that cross the range at a cost of $350 million. Heinrich, in his letter, questioned whether any route selected by BLM would satisfy Defense. “Moreover, DoD and WSMR have not yet provided any assurances that the route that they currently prefer will still be acceptable to them at any time in the future,” he wrote.
He told Jewell that if SunZia walks away from its planned project due to further delays in route approval, “it will significantly damage New Mexico’s prospects for large-scale renewable energy development. Without the ability to sell wind and solar energy outside the state, the demand for commercial scale renewable energy development will remain low.”
Udall, in an Aug. 16 interview with the Albuquerque Journal suggested that President Obama may need to intervene to resolve the differences between BLM and Defense. “When we have two agencies that disagree like this, the White House needs to try to crack some heads to find a solution,” Udall told the Journal. Without transmission projects like SunZia, New Mexico will lose out to other states that are developing renewable resources, Udall said.
Jennifer Talhelm, a Udall spokeswoman, told Nextgov that the Senator believes that New Mexico’s “unimpeded airspace and its abundant sun and wind” should be used to help the state create jobs and economic opportunity.
“At the end of the day, this is a conflict between two divisions of the administration,” she said, “and Sen. Udall believes the White House should step in and resolve the issue in a way that fully protects the important missions of WSMR and still allows for renewable energy transmission, which is essential for New Mexico to compete with its surrounding states in clean energy production. He has called on the administration to find a workable solution as soon as possible.”
Rep. Steve Pearce, R-N.M., whose district includes the missile range, has backed development of the SunZia line as long as it does not interfere with test operations. “I hope SunZia recognizes how damaging their proposed route will be to national security,” he has said, urging the company to alter the route.
Reprinted with permission from Nextgov.com. The original story can be found here.
What We're Following See More »
"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."
"Federal regulators on Thursday delayed a vote on a proposal to reshape the television market by freeing consumers from cable box rentals, putting into doubt a plan that has pitted technology companies against cable television providers. ... The proposal will still be considered for a future vote. But Tom Wheeler, chairman of the F.C.C., said commissioners needed more discussions."
"The Supreme Court is taking up a First Amendment clash over the government’s refusal to register offensive trademarks, a case that could affect the Washington Redskins in their legal fight over the team name. The justices agreed Thursday to hear a dispute involving an Asian-American rock band called the Slants, but they did not act on a separate request to hear the higher-profile Redskins case at the same time." Still, any precedent set by the case could have ramifications for the Washington football team.
The Hollywood Reporter takes a look at a little-known intersection of politics and entertainment, in which Trump campaign CEO Steve Bannon is still raking in residuals from Seinfeld. Here's the digest version: When Seinfeld was in its infancy, Ted Turner was in the process of acquiring its production company, Castle Rock, but he was under-capitalized. Bannon's fledgling media company put up the remaining funds, and he agreed to "participation rights" instead of a fee. "Seinfeld has reaped more than $3 billion in its post-network afterlife through syndication deals." Meanwhile, Bannon is "still cashing checks from Seinfeld, and observers say he has made nearly 25 times more off the Castle Rock deal than he had anticipated."