New Mexico Senators Differ on Proposed Missile Range Power Line

Bob Brewin, Nextgov.Com
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Bob Brewin, Nextgov.com
Aug. 22, 2013, 6:02 a.m.

WASH­ING­TON — New Mex­ico’s two Demo­crat­ic U.S. sen­at­ors dif­fer over plans to run a power trans­mis­sion line through White Sands Mis­sile Range test areas.

Ju­ni­or U.S. Sen. Mar­tin Hein­rich strongly backs de­vel­op­ment of the line as “vi­tal” to the state’s eco­nomy. Sen. Tom Ud­all, mean­while, has urged pres­id­en­tial in­ter­ven­tion to re­solve dif­fer­ences between the De­fense De­part­ment, which op­poses the plan, and the Bur­eau of Land Man­age­ment, which se­lec­ted the route.

In an Aug. 19 let­ter to In­teri­or De­part­ment Sec­ret­ary Sally Jew­ell, Hein­rich blas­ted the Pentagon for its con­tin­ued delay of the pro­ject by first agree­ing to and then back­ing off pro­posed routes for the line across the mis­sile range.

BLM has since 2009 over­seen the right-of-way pro­cess for the $1.5 bil­lion, 515 mile, 500 kV trans­mis­sion line planned by Sun­Zia LLC to link wind-power gen­er­at­ing sites in rur­al New Mex­ico with Ari­zona. On June 14, the bur­eau se­lec­ted a route that crosses the north­ern ex­ten­sion of the mis­sile range — a route op­posed by the Pentagon on na­tion­al se­cur­ity grounds be­cause it would in­ter­fere with mis­sile tests.

Hein­rich told Jew­ell that suc­cess­ful de­vel­op­ment of trans­mis­sion pro­jects like Sun­Zia’s are vi­tal to the state’s eco­nomy and job cre­ation.

Sun­Zia has po­si­tioned its pro­posed line as a way to trans­mit “green” en­ergy gen­er­ated by wind tur­bines in rur­al, east­ern New Mex­ico to urb­an mar­kets in Ari­zona and pos­sibly Cali­for­nia. Hein­rich agreed: “The Sun­Zia trans­mis­sion line will help de­liv­er wind and sol­ar en­ergy gen­er­ated in New Mex­ico to the ma­jor west­ern en­ergy de­mand cen­ters,” he said. “Without ac­cess to those mar­kets, New Mex­ico’s re­new­able en­ergy re­sources will re­main isol­ated and largely un­tapped.”

Hein­rich said De­fense first agreed to a route across the mis­sile range in May 2011, then later asked BLM to push the line fur­ther north. This month the Pentagon sug­ges­ted Sun­Zia bury 35 miles of the line that cross the range at a cost of $350 mil­lion. Hein­rich, in his let­ter, ques­tioned wheth­er any route se­lec­ted by BLM would sat­is­fy De­fense. “Moreover, DoD and WS­MR have not yet provided any as­sur­ances that the route that they cur­rently prefer will still be ac­cept­able to them at any time in the fu­ture,” he wrote.

He told Jew­ell that if Sun­Zia walks away from its planned pro­ject due to fur­ther delays in route ap­prov­al, “it will sig­ni­fic­antly dam­age New Mex­ico’s pro­spects for large-scale re­new­able en­ergy de­vel­op­ment. Without the abil­ity to sell wind and sol­ar en­ergy out­side the state, the de­mand for com­mer­cial scale re­new­able en­ergy de­vel­op­ment will re­main low.”

Ud­all, in an Aug. 16 in­ter­view with the Al­buquerque Journ­al sug­ges­ted that Pres­id­ent Obama may need to in­ter­vene to re­solve the dif­fer­ences between BLM and De­fense.  “When we have two agen­cies that dis­agree like this, the White House needs to try to crack some heads to find a solu­tion,” Ud­all told the Journ­al.  Without trans­mis­sion pro­jects like Sun­Zia, New Mex­ico will lose out to oth­er states that are de­vel­op­ing re­new­able re­sources, Ud­all said.

Jen­nifer Tal­helm, a Ud­all spokes­wo­man, told Nex­t­gov that the Sen­at­or be­lieves that New Mex­ico’s “un­im­peded air­space and its abund­ant sun and wind” should be used to help the state cre­ate jobs and eco­nom­ic op­por­tun­ity.

“At the end of the day, this is a con­flict between two di­vi­sions of the ad­min­is­tra­tion,” she said, “and Sen. Ud­all be­lieves the White House should step in and re­solve the is­sue in a way that fully pro­tects the im­port­ant mis­sions of WS­MR and still al­lows for re­new­able en­ergy trans­mis­sion, which is es­sen­tial for New Mex­ico to com­pete with its sur­round­ing states in clean en­ergy pro­duc­tion. He has called on the ad­min­is­tra­tion to find a work­able solu­tion as soon as pos­sible.”

Rep. Steve Pearce, R-N.M., whose dis­trict in­cludes the mis­sile range, has backed de­vel­op­ment of the Sun­Zia line as long as it does not in­ter­fere with test op­er­a­tions. “I hope Sun­Zia re­cog­nizes how dam­aging their pro­posed route will be to na­tion­al se­cur­ity,” he has said, ur­ging the com­pany to al­ter the route.

Re­prin­ted with per­mis­sion from Nex­t­gov.com. The ori­gin­al story can be found here.

What We're Following See More »
NEVER TRUMP
USA Today Weighs in on Presidential Race for First Time Ever
40 minutes ago
THE DETAILS

"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."

Source:
COMMISSIONERS NEED TO DELIBERATE MORE
FCC Pushes Vote on Set-Top Boxes
44 minutes ago
THE LATEST

"Federal regulators on Thursday delayed a vote on a proposal to reshape the television market by freeing consumers from cable box rentals, putting into doubt a plan that has pitted technology companies against cable television providers. ... The proposal will still be considered for a future vote. But Tom Wheeler, chairman of the F.C.C., said commissioners needed more discussions."

Source:
UNTIL DEC. 9, ANYWAY
Obama Signs Bill to Fund Government
5 hours ago
THE LATEST
REDSKINS IMPLICATIONS
SCOTUS to Hear Case on Offensive Trademarks
6 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

"The Supreme Court is taking up a First Amendment clash over the government’s refusal to register offensive trademarks, a case that could affect the Washington Redskins in their legal fight over the team name. The justices agreed Thursday to hear a dispute involving an Asian-American rock band called the Slants, but they did not act on a separate request to hear the higher-profile Redskins case at the same time." Still, any precedent set by the case could have ramifications for the Washington football team.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Bannon Still Collecting Royalties from ‘Seinfeld’
7 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The Hollywood Reporter takes a look at a little-known intersection of politics and entertainment, in which Trump campaign CEO Steve Bannon is still raking in residuals from Seinfeld. Here's the digest version: When Seinfeld was in its infancy, Ted Turner was in the process of acquiring its production company, Castle Rock, but he was under-capitalized. Bannon's fledgling media company put up the remaining funds, and he agreed to "participation rights" instead of a fee. "Seinfeld has reaped more than $3 billion in its post-network afterlife through syndication deals." Meanwhile, Bannon is "still cashing checks from Seinfeld, and observers say he has made nearly 25 times more off the Castle Rock deal than he had anticipated."

Source:
×