PEOPLE

After ‘I Have a Dream’ Speech, ‘A Shudder Went Through Me’ — and Through the Nation

Civil rights figures gather on the National Mall in Washington, Wednesday, Dec. 3, 2008, to see the future site of the Martin Luther King, Jr. National Memorial. From left are Rose Sanders, Rev. Samuel Billy Kyles, Clarence Jones, Rev. Otis Moss, Jr., and Xernona Clayton, foreground. (AP Photo/Gerald Herbert)
National Journal
Mike Magner
Aug. 26, 2013, 3:30 p.m.

There is no great­er au­thor­ity on the em­blem­at­ic speech of the civil-rights move­ment than Clar­ence B. Jones, a top ad­viser to Mar­tin Luth­er King Jr. in the 1960s who laid the found­a­tion for King’s “I Have a Dream” ad­dress de­livered 50 years ago Wed­nes­day.

Jones, 82, has been in great de­mand for in­ter­views in re­cent weeks as the an­niversary of the his­tor­ic speech at the March on Wash­ing­ton draws near. “You have no idea,” Jones said last week from his of­fice at Stan­ford Uni­versity, where he is schol­ar-in-res­id­ence at the Mar­tin Luth­er King Jr. Re­search and Edu­ca­tion In­sti­tute.

By now it is well known that Jones did not in­clude the words “I have a dream” in the “sug­ges­ted tex­tu­al ma­ter­i­al” he draf­ted for King be­fore the speech. King had used the phrase earli­er in speeches in De­troit and Rocky Mount, N.C., Jones said, and it was sing­er Ma­halia Jack­son who en­cour­aged King to go back to it when she called out to him in mid-speech from the steps of the Lin­coln Me­mori­al: “Tell ‘em about the dream, Mar­tin, tell ‘em about the dream!”

Jones said he didn’t real­ize at the time that his­tory was about to be made, but he did un­der­stand that something very spe­cial was go­ing to hap­pen as King paused and pushed aside his pre­pared text. “These people out there today don’t know it yet, but they’re about ready to go to church,” Jones said he told the per­son stand­ing next to him, about 50 feet be­hind King and look­ing out at a crowd of more than 250,000 people gathered on the Na­tion­al Mall.

“He, in re­sponse to Ma­halia, began to speak ex­tem­por­an­eously,” Jones said. And the now-fam­ous re­frain of “I have a dream” elec­tri­fied the mil­lions who watched in per­son or on live tele­vi­sion or in rebroad­casts later in a way it had not done in De­troit and Rocky Mount, “be­cause those pri­or speeches did not in­volve the con­flu­ence of tan­gible events which only ex­is­ted at the March on Wash­ing­ton,” Jones said. “Those events were as fol­lows:

“One, it was at the foot of the Lin­coln Me­mori­al.

“Two, it was be­fore the largest as­semblage of people as­sembled any­where in the United States for any pur­pose at any time, between 250,000 and 300,000 people.

“Three, 25 per­cent of the people as­sembled were white.

“Four, it was at the seat of the gov­ern­ment of the United States.

“Five, it was 100 years after the Eman­cip­a­tion Pro­clam­a­tion.

“And six, it was after a cul­min­a­tion of protests and events in our coun­try, pre­cip­it­ated by Birm­ing­ham in April 1963.”

Jones ex­plained that scenes on the even­ing news in the spring of 1963, in which po­lice in Birm­ing­ham, Ala., blas­ted black pro­test­ers with fire hoses and un­leashed dogs on them, res­ul­ted in more than 1,200 demon­stra­tions across the coun­try in the months be­fore the March on Wash­ing­ton. “And this raised the ques­tion to the na­tion as a whole: What kind of na­tion are we that we would per­mit this to hap­pen?” he said. “Dr. King’s speech was a sum­mons to the con­science of Amer­ica. That’s what it was.”

In his 2011 book Be­hind the Dream: The Mak­ing of the Speech That Trans­formed the Na­tion, Jones de­scribed how he felt in the mo­ments after King’s ad­dress on Aug. 28, 1963.

“A shud­der went through me as Mar­tin fin­ished,” he wrote. “I now knew that I had wit­nessed something bey­ond my wild­est ex­pect­a­tions. In truth, I know it was far bey­ond Mar­tin’s ex­pect­a­tions as well.

“Every­one on the Mall and a whole lot of people watch­ing on their tiny tele­vi­sion sets were aware that they had just ex­per­i­enced something tran­scend­ent. The ‘I Have a Dream’ speech was less than a minute old, yet it already felt time­less. Mar­tin had reached deep, and, with a prod in the right dir­ec­tion from the an­gel­ic Ma­halia Jack­son, come up with a way to paint a por­trait of how it felt to be black in Amer­ica. He had riffed like a mas­ter­ful jazz so­loist. Dur­ing the second half of the speech, he was like Charlie Park­er, John Col­trane, Fred­die Hub­bard, Sonny Stitt, and Li­onel Hamp­ton rolled in­to one. Mar­tin’s words seemed to ig­nite the spark Ma­halia had struck.”

Asked if things might be dif­fer­ent in the na­tion today if King were still alive, Jones re­spon­ded af­firm­at­ively.

“If he were still here today, he would in my opin­ion have emerged as the pree­m­in­ent mor­al spokes­per­son for Amer­ica. Not the pree­m­in­ent spokes­per­son for black Amer­ica, but for Amer­ica,” Jones said.

“Yes, I have to be­lieve that he was such a unique per­son in the his­tory of our coun­try that I think things would have been dif­fer­ent. I think he would have con­tin­ued to chal­lenge the con­science of Amer­ica,” he said. “Not only on its for­eign policy, but re­mem­ber, he was un­al­ter­ably com­mit­ted to non­vi­ol­ence. Un­al­ter­ably. His po­s­i­tion was either it’s non­vi­ol­ence or non-ex­ist­ence, non­vi­ol­ence or co-an­ni­hil­a­tion. There was no middle ground for him. There was no com­prom­ise on this is­sue.”

Jones ad­ded: “If he were alive today, he would say, ‘Stop the vi­ol­ence.’ None of the is­sues af­fect­ing Afric­an-Amer­ic­ans prin­cip­ally and the coun­try at large can be ad­equately ad­dressed in an en­vir­on­ment of 24-7 gun vi­ol­ence. Any­body who wants to hon­or the com­mem­or­a­tion, the leg­acy of Mar­tin King, it’s very simple, just get up from the rooftop and shout, ‘Stop the vi­ol­ence, stop the vi­ol­ence.’ “

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4400) }}

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
CITIZENS UNITED PT. 2?
Movie Based on ‘Clinton Cash’ to Debut at Cannes
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."

Source:
×