Why D.C. Is a Perfect Olympic City, According to Its Failed 2012 Pitch

In a nutshell: Washington is used to massive crowds and attention.

National Journal
Brian Resnick
See more stories about...
Brian Resnick
Aug. 27, 2013, 8:07 a.m.

Because D.C has hotels and an already entrenched media presence

More than 100,000 hotel rooms of all types and price ranges.

An East Coast of North Amer­ica loc­a­tion en­sur­ing large tick­et sales and max­im­um TV ex­pos­ure and rev­en­ue.

It wouldn’t have been an Olympic city. No, that was clearly not majest­ic enough. For their joint 2012 bid for the Olympics, Wash­ing­ton and Bal­timore pro­posed host­ing the event in a grand 50-mile “Olympic cor­ridor.” Four hun­dred and sixty miles of rail would trans­port ath­letes and ob­serv­ers around D.C.; Bal­timore; An­na­pol­is, Md.; and Al­ex­an­dria, Va., util­iz­ing the re­gion’s ex­ist­ing sport­ing aren­as and a few new ones. There wouldn’t be any traffic con­ges­tion. And the world would wander, mouths agog, among “a rich back­drop, anchored by his­tor­ic build­ings, sig­ni­fic­ant in­ter­na­tion­ally known monu­ments, im­port­ant and di­verse mu­seums, and out­stand­ing pub­lic spaces.”

And yes, the Olympic vil­lage would be hos­ted at the Uni­versity of Mary­land, giv­ing the ath­letes a well-suited ven­ue for after-event romp arounds.

“While at first blush the concept of hold­ing the Games in two sep­ar­ate states and the Dis­trict of Columbia may sound daunt­ing, the real­ity is quite the op­pos­ite,” reads the bid’s now-archived web­site.

While D.C. and Bal­timore were passed over in the Amer­ic­an bid for the 2012 Olympics, per­haps some of the same pitches still res­on­ate today, see­ing D.C. may be con­sid­er­ing a 2024 (the ‘20s, of course, will be the glor­i­ous dec­ade when mil­len­ni­als’ nar­ciss­ism and sense of pub­lic ser­vice reaches a peak). As re­cor­ded in the In­ter­net Archive’s Way­back Ma­chine, here are some reas­ons why D.C. should host the games.

Be­cause D.C has ho­tels and an already en­trenched me­dia pres­ence

More than 100,000 hotel rooms of all types and price ranges.

An East Coast of North Amer­ica loc­a­tion en­sur­ing large tick­et sales and max­im­um TV ex­pos­ure and rev­en­ue.

Be­cause we’ve done the math

The bid is eco­nom­ic­ally sound and fisc­ally con­ser­vat­ive, mak­ing ex­tens­ive use of the re­gion’s many ex­ist­ing ath­let­ic and oth­er fa­cil­it­ies. An op­er­at­ing sur­plus of $92 mil­lion is ex­pec­ted, and host­ing the Olympic and Para­lympic Games is ex­pec­ted to provide an over­all eco­nom­ic con­tri­bu­tion of $5.3 bil­lion to the re­gion’s eco­nomy.

Be­cause trans­port­a­tion “will be a breeze”

The Olympic and Para­lympic Games are about mov­ing thou­sands of people with ease and com­fort. We are blessed with a mass-trans­it sys­tem that al­lows us to say with con­fid­ence today that this will be a breeze.

Be­cause the loc­als will ac­tu­ally fill the stands

In 2000, we took a blind poll of our re­gion’s cit­izens and found very strong sup­port for the idea of host­ing the Games in our re­gion. In fact, 82 per­cent of area res­id­ents sup­por­ted the idea of bring­ing the Olympic and Para­lympic Games to the area. Sixty-nine pre­cent said they would at­tend at least one event. Eighty-six per­cent said they felt the games would bring sub­stan­tial eco­nom­ic be­ne­fit.

And be­cause, Amer­ica!

As a world cap­it­al and sym­bol of in­ter­na­tion­al free­dom and friend­ship, and pos­sess­ing a wealth of in­ter­na­tion­al, sports-event, polit­ic­al, cul­tur­al, and hos­pit­al­ity re­sources, Wash­ing­ton, D.C., is uniquely po­si­tioned with its com­pel­ling and power­ful in­ter­na­tion­al strategy for bring­ing the 2012 Games to the United States.

Because we've done the math

The bid is eco­nom­ic­ally sound and fisc­ally con­ser­vat­ive, mak­ing ex­tens­ive use of the re­gion’s many ex­ist­ing ath­let­ic and oth­er fa­cil­it­ies. An op­er­at­ing sur­plus of $92 mil­lion is ex­pec­ted, and host­ing the Olympic and Para­lympic Games is ex­pec­ted to provide an over­all eco­nom­ic con­tri­bu­tion of $5.3 bil­lion to the re­gion’s eco­nomy.

Because transportation "will be a breeze"

The Olympic and Para­lympic Games are about mov­ing thou­sands of people with ease and com­fort. We are blessed with a mass-trans­it sys­tem that al­lows us to say with con­fid­ence today that this will be a breeze.

Because the locals will actually fill the stands

In 2000, we took a blind poll of our re­gion’s cit­izens and found very strong sup­port for the idea of host­ing the Games in our re­gion. In fact, 82 per­cent of area res­id­ents sup­por­ted the idea of bring­ing the Olympic and Para­lympic Games to the area. Sixty-nine pre­cent said they would at­tend at least one event. Eighty-six per­cent said they felt the games would bring sub­stan­tial eco­nom­ic be­ne­fit.

And because, America!

As a world cap­it­al and sym­bol of in­ter­na­tion­al free­dom and friend­ship, and pos­sess­ing a wealth of in­ter­na­tion­al, sports-event, polit­ic­al, cul­tur­al, and hos­pit­al­ity re­sources, Wash­ing­ton, D.C., is uniquely po­si­tioned with its com­pel­ling and power­ful in­ter­na­tion­al strategy for bring­ing the 2012 Games to the United States.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
21 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Maher Weighs in on Bernie, Trump and Palin
22 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.

Source:
×