Why D.C. Is a Perfect Olympic City, According to Its Failed 2012 Pitch

In a nutshell: Washington is used to massive crowds and attention.

National Journal
Brian Resnick
See more stories about...
Brian Resnick
Aug. 27, 2013, 8:07 a.m.

Because D.C has hotels and an already entrenched media presence

More than 100,000 hotel rooms of all types and price ranges.

An East Coast of North Amer­ica loc­a­tion en­sur­ing large tick­et sales and max­im­um TV ex­pos­ure and rev­en­ue.

It wouldn’t have been an Olympic city. No, that was clearly not majest­ic enough. For their joint 2012 bid for the Olympics, Wash­ing­ton and Bal­timore pro­posed host­ing the event in a grand 50-mile “Olympic cor­ridor.” Four hun­dred and sixty miles of rail would trans­port ath­letes and ob­serv­ers around D.C.; Bal­timore; An­na­pol­is, Md.; and Al­ex­an­dria, Va., util­iz­ing the re­gion’s ex­ist­ing sport­ing aren­as and a few new ones. There wouldn’t be any traffic con­ges­tion. And the world would wander, mouths agog, among “a rich back­drop, anchored by his­tor­ic build­ings, sig­ni­fic­ant in­ter­na­tion­ally known monu­ments, im­port­ant and di­verse mu­seums, and out­stand­ing pub­lic spaces.”

And yes, the Olympic vil­lage would be hos­ted at the Uni­versity of Mary­land, giv­ing the ath­letes a well-suited ven­ue for after-event romp arounds.

“While at first blush the concept of hold­ing the Games in two sep­ar­ate states and the Dis­trict of Columbia may sound daunt­ing, the real­ity is quite the op­pos­ite,” reads the bid’s now-archived web­site.

While D.C. and Bal­timore were passed over in the Amer­ic­an bid for the 2012 Olympics, per­haps some of the same pitches still res­on­ate today, see­ing D.C. may be con­sid­er­ing a 2024 (the ‘20s, of course, will be the glor­i­ous dec­ade when mil­len­ni­als’ nar­ciss­ism and sense of pub­lic ser­vice reaches a peak). As re­cor­ded in the In­ter­net Archive’s Way­back Ma­chine, here are some reas­ons why D.C. should host the games.

Be­cause D.C has ho­tels and an already en­trenched me­dia pres­ence

More than 100,000 hotel rooms of all types and price ranges.

An East Coast of North Amer­ica loc­a­tion en­sur­ing large tick­et sales and max­im­um TV ex­pos­ure and rev­en­ue.

Be­cause we’ve done the math

The bid is eco­nom­ic­ally sound and fisc­ally con­ser­vat­ive, mak­ing ex­tens­ive use of the re­gion’s many ex­ist­ing ath­let­ic and oth­er fa­cil­it­ies. An op­er­at­ing sur­plus of $92 mil­lion is ex­pec­ted, and host­ing the Olympic and Para­lympic Games is ex­pec­ted to provide an over­all eco­nom­ic con­tri­bu­tion of $5.3 bil­lion to the re­gion’s eco­nomy.

Be­cause trans­port­a­tion “will be a breeze”

The Olympic and Para­lympic Games are about mov­ing thou­sands of people with ease and com­fort. We are blessed with a mass-trans­it sys­tem that al­lows us to say with con­fid­ence today that this will be a breeze.

Be­cause the loc­als will ac­tu­ally fill the stands

In 2000, we took a blind poll of our re­gion’s cit­izens and found very strong sup­port for the idea of host­ing the Games in our re­gion. In fact, 82 per­cent of area res­id­ents sup­por­ted the idea of bring­ing the Olympic and Para­lympic Games to the area. Sixty-nine pre­cent said they would at­tend at least one event. Eighty-six per­cent said they felt the games would bring sub­stan­tial eco­nom­ic be­ne­fit.

And be­cause, Amer­ica!

As a world cap­it­al and sym­bol of in­ter­na­tion­al free­dom and friend­ship, and pos­sess­ing a wealth of in­ter­na­tion­al, sports-event, polit­ic­al, cul­tur­al, and hos­pit­al­ity re­sources, Wash­ing­ton, D.C., is uniquely po­si­tioned with its com­pel­ling and power­ful in­ter­na­tion­al strategy for bring­ing the 2012 Games to the United States.

Because we've done the math

The bid is eco­nom­ic­ally sound and fisc­ally con­ser­vat­ive, mak­ing ex­tens­ive use of the re­gion’s many ex­ist­ing ath­let­ic and oth­er fa­cil­it­ies. An op­er­at­ing sur­plus of $92 mil­lion is ex­pec­ted, and host­ing the Olympic and Para­lympic Games is ex­pec­ted to provide an over­all eco­nom­ic con­tri­bu­tion of $5.3 bil­lion to the re­gion’s eco­nomy.

Because transportation "will be a breeze"

The Olympic and Para­lympic Games are about mov­ing thou­sands of people with ease and com­fort. We are blessed with a mass-trans­it sys­tem that al­lows us to say with con­fid­ence today that this will be a breeze.

Because the locals will actually fill the stands

In 2000, we took a blind poll of our re­gion’s cit­izens and found very strong sup­port for the idea of host­ing the Games in our re­gion. In fact, 82 per­cent of area res­id­ents sup­por­ted the idea of bring­ing the Olympic and Para­lympic Games to the area. Sixty-nine pre­cent said they would at­tend at least one event. Eighty-six per­cent said they felt the games would bring sub­stan­tial eco­nom­ic be­ne­fit.

And because, America!

As a world cap­it­al and sym­bol of in­ter­na­tion­al free­dom and friend­ship, and pos­sess­ing a wealth of in­ter­na­tion­al, sports-event, polit­ic­al, cul­tur­al, and hos­pit­al­ity re­sources, Wash­ing­ton, D.C., is uniquely po­si­tioned with its com­pel­ling and power­ful in­ter­na­tion­al strategy for bring­ing the 2012 Games to the United States.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
35 minutes ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
35 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
35 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
35 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
1 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×