Today, Facebook has more than 1 billion active users worldwide, spanning 70 languages and 210 countries. But no country cares as much about what those users are doing as the United States does, according to a new report from the social-media network.
Although 75 percent of Facebook users live outside the U.S., the country tops the list of governments that request user data. In just the first half of 2013, the U.S. government, including both local and national security law enforcement, made between 11,000 and 12,000 requests for between 20,000 and 21,000 users’ information. Facebook was required by law to disclose the data in 79 percent of these requests, the report states.
Indonesia, the country with the second-largest number of users, doesn’t appear on this report. India, the third largest, made 3,245 requests covering 4,144 users. For India, Facebook complied half the time. Of course, the U.S. is also the country with the largest number of Facebook users in the world, which can skew the numbers.
Facebook disclosed data for 68 percent of the 1,975 requests for 2,337 users made by the U.K., which put in the second-highest number of requests behind the U.S. In third was Germany with 1,886 and a compliance rate of 37 percent. Russia made just one request, which was denied.
While other digital giants such as Google and Twitter have previously published reports on government requests in the name of transparency, this is the first time Facebook is releasing such numbers.
Facebook has proved useful in aiding investigations without the use of legal pressure. One example is the New York Police Department, which conducts regular canvasses of the network. One Brooklyn precinct credits these searches, made possible by some criminals’ lack of privacy settings, with helping officers collect 199 illegal firearms last year.
But when law enforcement does request private, personal data, Facebook General Counsel Colin Stretch says that the social-media network doesn’t offer up user data as soon as government officials come calling. “We fight many of these requests, pushing back when we find legal deficiencies and narrowing the scope of overly broad or vague requests,” Stretch writes in the report. “When we are required to comply with a particular request, we frequently share only basic user information, such as name.”
But sometimes, it stands to reason, Facebook may give up more than just their users’ names. What that information is remains to be seen — Stretch promised the report isn’t the last of its kind, and future ones will include more information about the nature of the requests. And pulling user information is easy enough, even for the users themselves. In 2010, the website rolled out a feature that allowed users to download a zip file of their profiles consisting of HTML files of their walls, event histories, messages, lists of friends, and images.
In the past five years, a database maintained by the National Counterterrorism Center to track suspected terrorists added 335,000 names, for a total of 875,000. The list includes thousands of Americans. How many of them use Facebook?
What We're Following See More »
President Trump added five new names to his Supreme Court short list on Friday, should a need arise to appoint a new justice. The list now numbers 25 individuals. They are: 7th Circuit Appeals Judge Amy Coney Barrett, Georgia Supreme Court Justice Britt C. Grant, District of Columbia Circuit Appeals Court Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh, 11th Circuit Appeals Judge Kevin C. Newsom, and Oklahoma Supreme Court Justice Patrick Wyrick.
"Attorney General Jeff Sessions announced Friday the Justice Department will revamp its policy for issuing guidance documents. Speaking at the Federalist Society’s annual conference in Washington Friday, Sessions said the Justice Department will no longer issue guidance that 'purports to impose new obligations on any party outside the executive branch.' He said DOJ will review and repeal any documents that could violate this policy." Sessions said: “Too often, rather than going through the long, slow, regulatory process provided in statute, agencies make new rules through guidance documents—by simply sending a letter. This cuts off the public from the regulatory process by skipping the required public hearings and comment periods—and it is simply not what these documents are for. Guidance documents should be used to explain existing law—not to change it.”
"Christopher Steele, the former British intelligence officer who wrote the explosive dossier alleging ties between Donald Trump and Russia," says in a new book by The Guardian's Luke Harding that "Trump's land and hotel deals with Russians needed to be examined. ... Steele did not go into further detail, Harding said, but seemed to be referring to a 2008 home sale to the Russian oligarch Dmitry Rybolovlev. Richard Dearlove, who headed the UK foreign-intelligence unit MI6 between 1999 and 2004, said in April that Trump borrowed money from Russia for his business during the 2008 financial crisis."
"The British publicist who helped set up the fateful meeting between Donald Trump Jr. and a group of Russians at Trump Tower in June 2016 is ready to meet with Special Prosecutor Robert Mueller's office, according to several people familiar with the matter. Rob Goldstone has been living in Bangkok, Thailand, but has been communicating with Mueller's office through his lawyer, said a source close to Goldstone."