Lest we relive Election Night 2012, here’s a fact check of five points in Karl Rove’s anti-Obamacare ad, a parody submission by Crossroads GPS for the video contest the Health and Human Services Department opened on Aug. 19. Crossroads GPS is associated with the Karl Rove-backed super-PAC American Crossroads.
1. Pay 2.5 percent of your income in penalties
False. Under the new law you pay a penalty only if you don’t have health insurance. But that penalty doesn’t reach 2.5 percent of your income until 2016, at which point you may already have health care from your employer (see number 5) — or, if Karl Rove has his way, Obamacare is repealed.
2. Young people don’t have jobs
False. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the jobless rate among 25-to-34-year-olds was 7.5 percent in July. That’s down from 8.2 percent one year ago. Among that age group in 2012, the most current year available, 4,508,000 worked part time, compared with 26,192,000 working full time. Fewer than 3,000,000 indicated they were unemployed. Employment for young people also has followed the overall trend; the unemployment rate was 7.4 percent in July compared with 8.2 percent last year.
3. More part-time jobs due to Obamacare
False. The Federal Reserve already released a paper saying that recent trends in part-time employment are due to the recession. The paper also addressed concerns about the Affordable Care Act’s effect on work hours: “”¦both the impact of the law so far and the ultimate effect are likely to be small.”
4. Triple the health care premiums
Possibly. Age is less of a factor in determining Obamacare premiums than income. Under the law, a person receives more tax subsidies to defray the cost of insurance as he or she gets older. Earnings will determine the baseline of an individual’s premiums as well as how much he or she qualifies for in tax subsidies.
It is true that what a person will pay in premiums is higher in the Obamacare exchanges than what workers pay on average for employer-sponsored care . Single people age 25-34 earning $45,960 or more (400 percent of the federal poverty line) likely won’t qualify for tax subsidies and will pay triple (or more) in health care premiums than what workers are paying on average with employer-sponsored care, based on numbers from a Kaiser Family Foundation report and the Covered California cost calculator.
If you receive coverage under your employer, you shouldn’t see a rise in premiums. If you currently buy coverage on your own and make less than $45,960, you’ll probably get a tax subsidy and see some savings. If you don’t have employer coverage and you make more than $45,960, it is likely you will pay triple the health care premiums under Obamacare.
5. Employers don’t pay for one year and you do
True. The employer mandate was delayed until 2015, but the individual mandate takes effect Jan. 1, 2014. The employer mandate requires businesses with 50 or more workers to offer qualifying health insurance or pay penalties for each person receiving subsidized benefits from the exchanges. The individual mandate requires a person to have health insurance. So it is true that for one year, you will pay while your employer does not. But you could also choose to skip out on health insurance altogether. The penalty for not having insurance the first year is $95 or 1 percent of income, whichever is greater.
Want to submit your own video? The HHS is accepting submissions through Sept. 23.
What We're Following See More »
"Saudi Arabia said Saturday that Jamal Khashoggi, the dissident Saudi journalist who disappeared more than two weeks ago, had died after an argument and fistfight with unidentified men inside the Saudi Consulate in Istanbul. Eighteen men have been arrested and are being investigated in the case, Saudi state-run media reported without identifying any of them. State media also reported that Maj. Gen. Ahmed al-Assiri, the deputy director of Saudi intelligence, and other high-ranking intelligence officials had been dismissed."
"Special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation is scrutinizing how a collection of activists and pundits intersected with WikiLeaks, the website that U.S. officials say was the primary conduit for publishing materials stolen by Russia, according to people familiar with the matter. Mr. Mueller’s team has recently questioned witnesses about the activities of longtime Trump confidante Roger Stone, including his contacts with WikiLeaks, and has obtained telephone records, according to the people familiar with the matter."
"Special Counsel Robert Mueller is expected to issue findings on core aspects of his Russia probe soon after the November midterm elections ... Specifically, Mueller is close to rendering judgment on two of the most explosive aspects of his inquiry: whether there were clear incidents of collusion between Russia and Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign, and whether the president took any actions that constitute obstruction of justice." Mueller has faced pressure to wrap up the investigation from Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, said an official, who would receive the results of the investigation and have "some discretion in deciding what is relayed to Congress and what is publicly released," if he remains at his post.
"The Justice Department on Friday charged a Russian woman for her alleged role in a conspiracy to interfere with the 2018 U.S. election, marking the first criminal case prosecutors have brought against a foreign national for interfering in the upcoming midterms. Elena Khusyaynova, 44, was charged with conspiracy to defraud the United States. Prosecutors said she managed the finances of 'Project Lakhta,' a foreign influence operation they said was designed 'to sow discord in the U.S. political system' by pushing arguments and misinformation online about a host of divisive political issues, including immigration, the Confederate flag, gun control and the National Football League national-anthem protests."