Lest we relive Election Night 2012, here’s a fact check of five points in Karl Rove’s anti-Obamacare ad, a parody submission by Crossroads GPS for the video contest the Health and Human Services Department opened on Aug. 19. Crossroads GPS is associated with the Karl Rove-backed super-PAC American Crossroads.
1. Pay 2.5 percent of your income in penalties
False. Under the new law you pay a penalty only if you don’t have health insurance. But that penalty doesn’t reach 2.5 percent of your income until 2016, at which point you may already have health care from your employer (see number 5) — or, if Karl Rove has his way, Obamacare is repealed.
2. Young people don’t have jobs
False. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the jobless rate among 25-to-34-year-olds was 7.5 percent in July. That’s down from 8.2 percent one year ago. Among that age group in 2012, the most current year available, 4,508,000 worked part time, compared with 26,192,000 working full time. Fewer than 3,000,000 indicated they were unemployed. Employment for young people also has followed the overall trend; the unemployment rate was 7.4 percent in July compared with 8.2 percent last year.
3. More part-time jobs due to Obamacare
False. The Federal Reserve already released a paper saying that recent trends in part-time employment are due to the recession. The paper also addressed concerns about the Affordable Care Act’s effect on work hours: “”¦both the impact of the law so far and the ultimate effect are likely to be small.”
4. Triple the health care premiums
Possibly. Age is less of a factor in determining Obamacare premiums than income. Under the law, a person receives more tax subsidies to defray the cost of insurance as he or she gets older. Earnings will determine the baseline of an individual’s premiums as well as how much he or she qualifies for in tax subsidies.
It is true that what a person will pay in premiums is higher in the Obamacare exchanges than what workers pay on average for employer-sponsored care . Single people age 25-34 earning $45,960 or more (400 percent of the federal poverty line) likely won’t qualify for tax subsidies and will pay triple (or more) in health care premiums than what workers are paying on average with employer-sponsored care, based on numbers from a Kaiser Family Foundation report and the Covered California cost calculator.
If you receive coverage under your employer, you shouldn’t see a rise in premiums. If you currently buy coverage on your own and make less than $45,960, you’ll probably get a tax subsidy and see some savings. If you don’t have employer coverage and you make more than $45,960, it is likely you will pay triple the health care premiums under Obamacare.
5. Employers don’t pay for one year and you do
True. The employer mandate was delayed until 2015, but the individual mandate takes effect Jan. 1, 2014. The employer mandate requires businesses with 50 or more workers to offer qualifying health insurance or pay penalties for each person receiving subsidized benefits from the exchanges. The individual mandate requires a person to have health insurance. So it is true that for one year, you will pay while your employer does not. But you could also choose to skip out on health insurance altogether. The penalty for not having insurance the first year is $95 or 1 percent of income, whichever is greater.
Want to submit your own video? The HHS is accepting submissions through Sept. 23.
What We're Following See More »
"The Justice Department inspector general referred its finding that former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe repeatedly misled investigators who were examining a media disclosure to the top federal prosecutor in D.C. to determine whether McCabe should be charged with a crime." The referral occurred "after the inspector general concluded McCabe had lied to investigators or his own boss, then-FBI Director James B. Comey, on four occasions, three of them under oath." The referral does "not necessarily mean McCabe will be charge with a crime ... although the report alleged that one of McCabe’s lies 'was done knowingly and intentionally.'"
A federal appeals court in Chicago "upheld a nationwide injunction against making federal grant funding contingent on cooperation with immigration enforcement." The three Republican appointees ruled that the Trump administration "exceeded its legal authority in trying to implement the new conditions without approval from Congress ... One judge on the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals panel, Reagan appointee Daniel Manion, said he would narrow the injunction solely to protect Chicago. However, the two other judges assigned to the case said the nationwide injunction appeared to be justified."
Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley "decided Thursday to delay markup" on a bill to protect Special Counsel Robert Mueller until next week. But he remains steadfast in his support for a committee vote, despite Majority Leader Mitch McConnell's "pledge to kill it" if it gets to the floor.
North Korea has expressed its commitment to 'complete denuclearisation' of the Korean peninsula and is not seeking conditions, South Korean President Moon Jae-in said on Thursday. ... South Korea announced on Wednesday that it is considering how to change a decades-old armistice with North Korea into a peace agreement as it prepares for the North-South summit this month." The leaders of the respective countries are also expected to connect a phone line so they can communicate directly.
"California reached an agreement with the federal government that the state’s National Guard troops will deploy to the border to focus on fighting transnational gangs as well as drug and gun smugglers, Gov. Jerry Brown said. ... Brown said Wednesday he secured federal funding for terms similar to those outlined in last week’s proposed contract: The Guard cannot handle custody duties for anyone accused of immigration violations, build border barriers or have anything to do with immigration enforcement."