Yeah, He Went There

<i>Advocate</i>‘s Gill dubs “Cassidycare” a major problem for GOP.

Add to Briefcase
Aug. 29, 2013, 7:23 a.m.

In a column of­fi­cially in­stat­ing the monik­er “Cas­sidy­care,” the Bat­on Rouge Ad­voc­ate‘s Gill ques­tions wheth­er Rep. Bill Cas­sidy (R-06) can make a case against Sen. Mary Landrieu (D), giv­en that he pro­posed le­gis­la­tion with sim­il­ar pro­vi­sions to the Af­ford­able Care Act while serving in the state Sen­ate. Gill writes: “Secretly,” Re­pub­lic­ans “must love” Landrieu. “They are out to keep her safe this time by ral­ly­ing be­hind U.S. Rep. Bill Cas­sidy, who will be por­trayed throughout the cam­paign as a trait­or to his own sig­na­ture is­sue.” Cas­sidy’s le­gis­la­tion didn’t in­clude an in­di­vidu­al man­date, but the de­tails de­bate over the dif­fer­ences between his bill and the Af­ford­able Care Act “may get lost in the hurly burly of the cam­paign. That Cas­sidy shared Obama’s en­thu­si­asm for a gov­ern­ment role in uni­ver­sal health care may mat­ter more than their dif­fer­ing no­tions of how to achieve it. … Voters must won­der about his smarts if Cas­sidy did not ex­pect Demo­crats to pounce on the ap­par­ent shift in his prin­ciples.” He could have brought it up be­fore op­pos­i­tion re­search­ers found it. “Now, his re­sponse is to lam­baste Landrieu yet again for sup­port­ing Obama­care, while do­ing noth­ing to counter the im­pres­sion that a guilty secret has been un­covered.” (Bat­on Rouge Ad­voc­ate)
Sarah Mimms


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.