INSIDE WASHINGTON

What Sports Would Washingtonians Win If They Hosted the Olympics?

A man texts while walking in downtown Palo Alto, Calif., Wednesday, June 30, 2010. 
AP
Marin Cogan, Scott Bland and Josh Kraushaar
See more stories about...
Marin Cogan Scott Bland Josh Kraushaar
Aug. 29, 2013, 10:01 a.m.

Medalers

Rocky Roads

Mur­murs

Medalers

If any news story was able to pen­et­rate the hive mind of the polit­ic­al-me­dia class last week, bey­ond the freak­ing out over Mi­ley Cyr­us’s Video Mu­sic Awards per­form­ance (along with, you know, the freak­ing out over the pos­sib­il­ity of an at­tack on Syr­ia), it was word that Wash­ing­ton might be get­ting an­oth­er shot at host­ing the Olympics, in 2024. On Tues­day, Bob Sweeney, head of the Great­er Wash­ing­ton Sports Al­li­ance, an­nounced the launch of D.C. 2024, a non­profit aimed at ex­plor­ing a bid for the Sum­mer Games. The dream to bring the Olympics to Wash­ing­ton is still many years and many bil­lions of dol­lars away from be­com­ing a real­ity. But it did in­spire something al­most as rare as an Olympic event: an ac­tu­ally kind of funny D.C.-cent­ric Twit­ter hasht­ag. Some of our fa­vor­ites from #dco­lympicevents: single track­ing (@tech­n0crat­ic); tweet­ing while walk­ing (@john­son); kick­ing the can (@petes­chroeder); punt­ing on le­gis­la­tion (@daniel­strauss4); run­ning of the in­terns (@as­mith83); and soft­ball with Chris Mat­thews (@ry­an­beck­with.) But, as with all good things here, the qual­ity and pop­ular­ity of the hasht­ag were in­versely pro­por­tion­al. By Wed­nes­day, one-liners about red tape and pro­ced­ur­al hurdles were clog­ging the Twit­ter stream.

Mar­in Cogan

Rocky Roads

Out­side groups are spend­ing money earli­er than ever, but miss­ing from all the ac­tion: cash-flush Amer­ic­an Cross­roads, the GOP grand­daddy of su­per PACs. Cross­roads not­ably stayed out of the spe­cial Sen­ate elec­tion in Mas­sachu­setts, be­liev­ing the race was un­winnable. It didn’t want to touch Mark San­ford in South Car­o­lina’s spe­cial House elec­tion in the 1st Dis­trict. But the group also isn’t spend­ing money to soften vul­ner­able Dem in­cum­bents such as Mark Pry­or or Mary Landrieu; at this point in 2011, it had already at­tacked Claire Mc­Caskill. (Its roster of Mc­Con­nell alums en­sures in­volve­ment in Ken­tucky.) More im­port­ant, dona­tions to Amer­ic­an Cross­roads are down sig­ni­fic­antly in the off-year. Through the first six months of 2013, it raised $1.86 mil­lion. Dur­ing the same peri­od in 2011, it raised $3.93 mil­lion. After Cross­roads lost 11 of 13 Sen­ate races it spent money on in 2012, big donors are less will­ing to pony up. The oth­er reas­on: its re­newed fo­cus on per­suad­ing Re­pub­lic­ans to sup­port im­mig­ra­tion re­form. That shift from polit­ics to policy came up short, fail­ing to con­vince its tar­gets des­pite the ad blitz. Cross­roads helped fash­ion the cur­rent cam­paign fin­ance world, and it’ll play a pivotal role in 2014. But with more money from up­starts be­ing spent earli­er, it risks be­ing left be­hind.

Scott Bland and Josh Kraush­aar

Murmurs

Air Mar­shal Pres­id­ent Obama is ex­pec­ted to nom­in­ate Janet Mc­Cabe, a deputy ad­min­is­trat­or at the En­vir­on­ment­al Pro­tec­tion Agency’s clean-air of­fice, to head that di­vi­sion, ac­cord­ing to sources fa­mil­i­ar with his think­ing. The po­s­i­tion would put Mc­Cabe at the heart of the pres­id­ent’s his­tor­ic, and con­tro­ver­sial, glob­al-warm­ing agenda. She would be charged with craft­ing massive new pol­lu­tion reg­u­la­tions af­fect­ing coal-fired power plants — rules that could even­tu­ally freeze the na­tion’s coal in­dustry but also po­s­i­tion the U.S. as a glob­al lead­er on cli­mate change. She will step in­to the shoes of her boss, Gina Mc­Carthy, who was con­firmed last month as EPA’s chief. While Mc­Carthy will be the pub­lic face of the new cli­mate-change reg­u­la­tions, Mc­Cabe will act as her right-hand wo­man, tak­ing on the bur­den of draft­ing and leg­ally bul­let­proof­ing the rules, as well as work­ing with all the stake­hold­ers they’ll af­fect — states, elec­tric util­it­ies, con­sumers, and en­vir­on­ment­al ad­voc­ates. It’s likely that Mc­Cabe could face a tough con­firm­a­tion pro­cess. Sen­ate Re­pub­lic­ans held up Mc­Carthy’s con­firm­a­tion for more than 100 days.

What We're Following See More »
SHE’LL HAVE A ROLE WITH CLINTON CAMP
Wasserman Schultz to Resign at Week’s End
4 hours ago
THE LATEST

"After hours of private talks," Debbie Wasserman Schultz agreed to step down as chair of the Democratic National Committee after the convention ends. In the wake of the convention intrigue, Hillary Clinton announced she's making Wasserman Schultz "the honorary chair of her campaign's 50-state program."

Source:
MARCIA FUDGE TO PRESIDE
Wasserman Schultz Stripped of Convention Duties
12 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Democratic National Committee Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz "will not have a major speaking role or preside over daily convention proceedings this week," and is under increasing pressure to resign. The DNC Rules Committee on Saturday named Ohio Democratic Rep. Marcia Fudge as "permanent chair of the convention." At issue: internal DNC emails leaked by Wikileaks that show how "the DNC favored Clinton during the primary and tried to take down Bernie Sanders by questioning his religion."

Source:
EARLY BUMP FOR TRUMP?
New Round of Polls Show a Tight Race
2 days ago
THE LATEST
  • A Rasmussen Reports poll shows Donald Trump ahead of Hillary Clinton, 43%-42%, the fourth week in a row he's led the poll (one of the few poll in which he's led consistently of late).
  • A Reuters/Ipsos survey shows Clinton leading 40%-36%. In a four-way race, she maintains her four-point lead, 39%-35%, with Gary Johnson and Jill Stein pulling 7% and 3%, respectively.
  • And the LA Times/USC daily tracking poll shows a dead heat, with Trump ahead by about half a percentage point.
BELLWETHER?
Candidates Deadlocked in Ohio
3 days ago
THE LATEST
17-POINT EDGE AMONG MILLENNIALS
Clinton Dominates Among Younger Voters
3 days ago
THE DETAILS

In an election between two candidates around 70 years of age, millennials strongly prefer one over the other. Hillary Clinton has a 47%-30% edge among votes 18 to 29. She also leads 46%-36% among voters aged 30 to 44.

Source:
×