Obama’s Stealth War on Global Warming

Stymied by Congress, President Obama is staffing his administration with appointees ready to take aggressive action on climate change.

A farmer ploughs his last furrow in his field with his team of Shire horses, in Wiltshire, England, Feb. 15, 1937. 
AP
Coral Davenport
See more stories about...
Coral Davenport
Aug. 29, 2013, 10:59 a.m.

As Pres­id­ent Obama tries to fight glob­al warm­ing without any back­ing from a grid­locked Con­gress, he’s us­ing every weapon in his ex­ec­ut­ive ar­sen­al. His En­vir­on­ment­al Pro­tec­tion Agency will soon roll out con­tro­ver­sial reg­u­la­tions on car­bon pol­lu­tion from coal-fired power plants. He’s told every Cab­in­et agency to look in­to ways it can use its au­thor­ity to act on cli­mate change. And now the ad­min­is­tra­tion is stock­ing the ex­ec­ut­ive branch with an army of new ap­pointees who have a his­tory of work­ing ag­gress­ively on cli­mate is­sues and clean en­ergy, of­ten from lead­er­ship jobs at en­vir­on­ment­al ad­vocacy groups.

It’s not sur­pris­ing to see a pres­id­ent name a top nom­in­ee — for Cab­in­et sec­ret­ary, say — who has led the way on an is­sue the White House cares about. In his first term, for ex­ample, Obama named as his En­ergy sec­ret­ary Steven Chu, a No­bel phys­i­cist who had de­voted his ca­reer to fight­ing cli­mate change. With the ex­ec­ut­ive branch the only av­en­ue for the pres­id­ent to make an im­pact on cli­mate policy, the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion is filling out the second and third tiers of agen­cies — in­flu­en­tial work­horse po­s­i­tions such as chiefs of staff, as­sist­ant sec­ret­ar­ies, and heads of reg­u­lat­ory com­mis­sions — with ap­pointees just as de­voted to the cause, with the ex­pect­a­tion that they’ll muscle through a cli­mate and clean-en­ergy agenda wherever they can.

The strategy is draw­ing cheers from en­vir­on­ment­al­ists and fire from con­ser­vat­ives, who both agree that these be­hind-the-scenes po­s­i­tions have a siz­able im­pact on shap­ing policy. “The pres­id­ent has made it “¦ clear that he wants fur­ther ac­tion on cli­mate to be a big part of his leg­acy,” said Frank O’Don­nell, pres­id­ent of Clean Air Watch. “He’s not go­ing to get co­oper­a­tion from Con­gress, so the only way to carve out a leg­acy on cli­mate is to have folks at fed­er­al agen­cies that can make things hap­pen. Some of these jobs which no one’s ever heard of are be­ing filled by people who can make things hap­pen.”

Scott Segal, who lob­bies for coal com­pan­ies with the law firm Bracewell & Gi­uliani, wrote in an e-mail to Na­tion­al Journ­al, “En­ergy- and en­vir­on­ment­al-policy de­vel­op­ment has al­ways been more about work­horses than show horses. The sub­ject mat­ter is ar­cane, and there­fore the role of the less vis­ible ex­ec­ut­ive ap­point­ment in ex­ec­ut­ive agen­cies looms large as com­plic­ated is­sues like car­bon policy loom on the near-term event ho­ri­zon.” Segal ad­ded, “For cer­tain of these roles, the ad­min­is­tra­tion has shown a troub­ling pre­dis­pos­i­tion to nom­in­ate in­di­vidu­als from the act­iv­ist com­munity…. What is needed are real­ist­ic and dis­pas­sion­ate pro­fes­sion­als that can bal­ance eco­nom­ic and en­vir­on­ment­al ob­ject­ives with re­spect for the rule of law.”

Segal and oth­ers in in­dustry are par­tic­u­larly in­censed at Obama’s nom­in­a­tion of Ron Binz to chair the Fed­er­al En­ergy Reg­u­lat­ory Com­mis­sion, a re­l­at­ively ob­scure pan­el that non­ethe­less wields sig­ni­fic­ant reg­u­lat­ory muscle in im­ple­ment­ing en­ergy policy. Binz, a former chair­man of the Col­or­ado Pub­lic Util­it­ies Com­mis­sion, drew out­rage from the coal in­dustry for help­ing to write a state law aimed at shut­ting down coal-fired power plants. In state­ments and speeches, he’s been up front about his philo­sophy of en­ergy: He backs re­new­ables over fossil fuels. His per­son­al web­site has a “Philo­sophy” list­ing a series of talks and state­ments cham­pi­on­ing re­new­able en­ergy. In an ed­it­or­i­al slam­ming Binz as “rad­ic­al,” The Wall Street Journ­al called him “the most im­port­ant nom­in­ee you’ve nev­er heard of.” As the drum­beat of op­pos­i­tion to Binz has in­creased, a group of en­vir­on­ment­al act­iv­ists hired a Wash­ing­ton PR firm, VennSquared Com­mu­nic­a­tions, to cam­paign for him as he heads in­to what looks like a tough and testy Sen­ate con­firm­a­tion pro­cess. (Binz de­clined a re­quest for an in­ter­view with Na­tion­al Journ­al, say­ing he in­tends to re­frain from speak­ing to the press un­til after his Sen­ate con­firm­a­tion.)

Also rais­ing eye­brows among con­ser­vat­ives is Obama’s Ju­ly ap­point­ment of Kev­in Knobloch, former pres­id­ent of the Uni­on of Con­cerned Sci­ent­ists and a long­time play­er in the world of cli­mate policy and ad­vocacy, as the En­ergy De­part­ment’s new chief of staff. “I can­not ima­gine a mo­ment in his­tory when we have had a win­dow where the De­part­ment of En­ergy’s mis­sion has been more im­port­ant,” Knobloch said of the de­part­ment’s plans to toughen en­ergy-ef­fi­ciency stand­ards and in­nov­ate ways to burn fossil fuels more cleanly.

“Someone like Kev­in Knobloch — an ap­point­ment like that would have been less likely in the first term,” said Paul Bled­soe, a seni­or cli­mate-policy ad­viser in the Clin­ton White House. “The chief of staff to the En­ergy De­part­ment, In­teri­or, EPA — those are im­port­ant jobs. Those are people with a great deal of in­flu­ence.” O’Don­nell, pres­id­ent of Clean Air Watch, said, “I can’t ima­gine why Kev­in would take that job un­less he had a chance to do something big — something his­tor­ic.”

Mean­while, earli­er this month, the Sen­ate con­firmed Den­nis Mc­Ginn as as­sist­ant Navy sec­ret­ary for en­ergy in­stall­a­tions and the en­vir­on­ment. Al­though the po­s­i­tion is little known, the ap­point­ment of Mc­Ginn, a re­tired Navy vice ad­mir­al who headed the Amer­ic­an Coun­cil on Re­new­able En­ergy, sig­nals Obama’s in­tent to keep us­ing the Pentagon to drive re­new­able-en­ergy tech­no­logy. Mc­Ginn has served as co­chair­man of the CNA Mil­it­ary Ad­vis­ory Board, which au­thored a prom­in­ent pa­per ur­ging the de­fense com­munity to pri­or­it­ize cli­mate change as a na­tion­al se­cur­ity is­sue. He also has served as a fel­low at the Rocky Moun­tain In­sti­tute, a think tank that pub­lishes pa­pers ad­voc­at­ing policies to fight cli­mate change and pro­mote re­new­able en­ergy.

“The ap­point­ment of Denny means this is not just a one-and-done is­sue,” said Douglas Wilson, a former as­sist­ant sec­ret­ary of pub­lic af­fairs for the Pentagon. “What we’re see­ing in these ap­point­ments is an ef­fort not to have place­hold­ers but people who have his­tory in clean en­ergy.”

Amy Harder contributed contributed to this article.
What We're Following See More »
WEST WING REDUX
Allison Janney Takes to the Real White House Podium
16 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

Carolyn Kaster/AP

STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
42 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
1 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
2 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
5 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
×