Prominent Democratic Pollster Changing Its Methodology

Public Policy Polling will be adding cell-phone users to its sample.

Action on the floor of the 2012 Republican National Convention in Tampa, Florida
National Journal
Steven Shepard
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Steven Shepard
Aug. 29, 2013, 10:19 a.m.

The Demo­crat­ic robo-polling firm Pub­lic Policy Polling is ex­plor­ing a sig­ni­fic­ant change to its meth­od­o­logy to in­clude the tens of mil­lions of voters who do not have land­line tele­phones.

PPP next Tues­day will is­sue a re­quest for pro­pos­als on in­clud­ing re­spond­ents who only have cell phones, said Tom Jensen, the firm’s dir­ect­or, who over­sees PPP’s day-to-day op­er­a­tions. These pro­pos­als may in­clude live-op­er­at­or phone calls to cell-phone re­spond­ents and text- and In­ter­net-based re­sponses.

The auto­mated tech­no­logy em­ployed by PPP and oth­er robo-poll­sters is less ex­pens­ive than tra­di­tion­al tele­phone polling, since there’s no need to em­ploy live in­ter­view­ers to ques­tion re­spond­ents and re­cord their an­swers. But fed­er­al law pro­hib­its auto­mat­ic dialers from call­ing cell phones, mean­ing that PPP’s sur­veys have only in­cluded land­line in­ter­views.

This has had a broad im­pact on the in­dustry. Since even most live-op­er­at­or polling firms use com­pu­ter­ized dialers, in­cor­por­at­ing more cell-phone re­spond­ents has been a costly en­deavor. But it has a broad­er im­pact for auto­mated poll­sters.

PPP’s pub­lic polls have be­come ubi­quit­ous in re­cent years, with polit­ic­al ob­serv­ers re­ly­ing on their sur­veys to touch on over­looked races and fill in the gaps cre­ated by shrink­ing me­dia budgets. That’s a gap that PPP has filled em­phat­ic­ally; the week­end be­fore last year’s elec­tion, the firm con­duc­ted pub­lic sur­veys in 19 dif­fer­ent states.

Some robo-polling firms, in­clud­ing Sur­vey­USA and Rasmussen Re­ports, have already taken steps to in­clude cell-phone re­spond­ents. Rasmussen began us­ing In­ter­net-based pan­els to sup­ple­ment their land­line in­ter­views last year, and Sur­vey­USA has been ex­per­i­ment­ing with both In­ter­net and live-caller in­ter­views.

Jensen said PPP is open to any pro­pos­al, and he hopes that po­ten­tial vendors for this sur­vey in­fra­struc­ture pitch him on a num­ber of dif­fer­ent ideas. “We cer­tainly know what oth­er people are do­ing, but we don’t really know the mech­an­ics of it,” he said.

The re­quest for pro­pos­als in­cludes a num­ber of factors for vendors to con­sider in mak­ing their pro­pos­als that speak to some of PPP’s unique chal­lenges. Though most polit­ic­al ob­serv­ers know PPP for the pub­lic polls they pro­duce and re­lease on their own web­site, the firm also works for Demo­crat­ic can­did­ates and causes. Ac­cord­ing to the re­quest, PPP is look­ing for pitches that would al­low it to provide the same, quick turn­around time for its sur­veys, in ad­di­tion to what the firm calls “scalab­il­ity” — the abil­ity to con­duct a poll in a small geo­graph­ic area for a loc­al or mu­ni­cip­al can­did­ate.

Take a loc­al, D.C. Coun­cil race, for ex­ample: Us­ing land­line ex­changes and lis­ted phone num­bers, it’s not dif­fi­cult to com­pile a sampling frame to in­clude only those num­bers cor­res­pond­ing to ad­dresses with­in the cor­rect ward. But since cell phones aren’t as­so­ci­ated with a phys­ic­al ad­dress, call­ing all num­bers with a “202” area code would mean that (as­sum­ing equal in­cid­ence of cell-phone own­er­ship) sev­en of every eight re­spond­ents wouldn’t be eli­gible to vote in that elec­tion. And that also as­sumes that voters don’t have “301” or “703” (or any oth­er area code) phones.

The oth­er key factor for PPP is af­ford­ab­il­ity. Be­cause of its auto­mated meth­od­o­logy, PPP’s prices are lower than oth­er Demo­crat­ic cam­paign poll­sters — and it in­tends to keep them that way. “We spe­cial­ize in provid­ing af­ford­able polling ser­vices to cli­ents who might not oth­er­wise be able to af­ford to do sur­vey re­search,” the firm’s re­quest for pro­pos­als states.

That means the firm is un­likely to fo­cus on the ex­pens­ive prac­tice of call­ing cell phones with live in­ter­view­ers as its main solu­tion to the cell-phone prob­lem, though Jensen said they could con­tract with a call cen­ter for that ser­vice if the cli­ent in­sisted.

Whatever solu­tion PPP de­cides to ex­plore, ex­pect it to be im­ple­men­ted on its pub­lic polls, as well — the one-to-three weekly sur­veys the firm con­ducts at its own ex­pense as a mar­ket­ing tool (this week, it was a poll of the Maine Sen­ate and gubernat­ori­al races).

“Our first choice would be something that’s cost-ef­fect­ive enough and easy enough to use on all of our sur­veys,” Jensen said.

Earli­er this year, Jensen told Hot­line On Call that it was likely his firm would ex­plore ways to in­cor­por­ate those without land­line phones. More than 38 per­cent of adult Amer­ic­ans live in house­holds without a land­line phone, ac­cord­ing to the latest data from the Cen­ters for Dis­ease Con­trol, col­lec­ted dur­ing the second half of 2012.

“I think there’s a de­cent chance that we can keep on not call­ing cell phones and get­ting de­cent res­ults,” Jensen said Thursday. “Ob­vi­ously, we want our polls to be reach­ing as close to 100 per­cent of the pub­lic as pos­sible.”

What We're Following See More »
STAKES ARE HIGH
Debate Could Sway One-Third of Voters
1 hours ago
THE LATEST

"A new Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll found that 34% of registered voters think the three presidential debates would be extremely or quite important in helping them decide whom to support for president. About 11% of voters are considered 'debate persuadables'—that is, they think the debates are important and are either third-party voters or only loosely committed to either major-party candidate."

Source:
YOU DON’T BRING ME FLOWERS ANYMORE
Gennifer Flowers May Not Appear After All
2 hours ago
THE LATEST

Will he or won't he? That's the question surrounding Donald Trump and his on-again, off-again threats to bring onetime Bill Clinton paramour Gennifer Flowers to the debate as his guest. An assistant to flowers initially said she'd be there, but Trump campaign chief Kellyanne Conway "said on ABC’s 'This Week' that the Trump campaign had not invited Flowers to the debate, but she didn’t rule out the possibility of Flowers being in the audience."

Source:
HAS BEEN OFF OF NEWSCASTS FOR A WEEK
For First Debate, Holt Called on NBC Experts for Prep
2 hours ago
THE DETAILS

NBC's Lester Holt hasn't hosted the "Nightly News" since Tuesday, as he's prepped for moderating the first presidential debate tonight—and the first of his career. He's called on a host of NBC talent to help him, namely NBC News and MSNBC chairman Andy Lack; NBC News president Deborah Turness; the news division's senior vice president of editorial, Janelle Rodriguez; "Nightly News" producer Sam Singal, "Meet the Press" host Chuck Todd, senior political editor Mark Murray and political editor Carrie Dann. But during the debate itself, the only person in Holt's earpiece will be longtime debate producer Marty Slutsky.

Source:
WHITE HOUSE PROMISES VETO
House Votes to Bar Cash Payments to Iran
2 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"The House passed legislation late Thursday that would prohibit the federal government from making any cash payments to Iran, in protest of President Obama's recently discovered decision to pay Iran $1.7 billion in cash in January. And while the White House has said Obama would veto the bill, 16 Democrats joined with Republicans to pass the measure, 254-163."

Source:
NO SURPRISE
Trump Eschewing Briefing Materials in Debate Prep
2 hours ago
THE DETAILS

In contrast to Hillary Clinton's meticulous debate practice sessions, Donald Trump "is largely shun­ning tra­di­tion­al de­bate pre­par­a­tions, but has been watch­ing video of…Clin­ton’s best and worst de­bate mo­ments, look­ing for her vul­ner­ab­il­it­ies.” Trump “has paid only curs­ory at­ten­tion to brief­ing ma­ter­i­als. He has re­fused to use lecterns in mock de­bate ses­sions des­pite the ur­ging of his ad­visers. He prefers spit­balling ideas with his team rather than hon­ing them in­to crisp, two-minute an­swers.”

Source:
×