Here Is the Evidence the U.S. Has on a Syrian Chemical-Weapons Attack

With an eye to the intelligence failure in Iraq, the Obama administration tries to sell a skeptical public on a response to Syria.

Secretary of State John Kerry said the U.S. knows the Syrian regime carefully prepared for days to launch a chemical weapons attack.
National Journal
Matt Vasilogambros
Aug. 30, 2013, 12:48 p.m.

John Kerry re­peated one phrase over and over and over again Fri­day dur­ing his stern state­ment ac­cus­ing the As­sad re­gime of car­ry­ing out a chem­ic­al-weapons at­tack in a Dam­as­cus sub­urb last week: “We know “¦”

The sec­ret­ary of State lis­ted a series of what he said were facts in this case, con­firmed by in­tel­li­gence sources and re­in­forced by a pa­per the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion re­leased about the at­tack. And it’s for a simple reas­on. Kerry and Pres­id­ent Obama are im­mensely aware of Ir­aq and the in­tel­li­gence mis­takes that the Bush ad­min­is­tra­tion made in the run-up to the con­flict. In fact, Kerry ac­know­ledged as much.

“Our in­tel­li­gence com­munity has care­fully re­viewed and re-re­viewed in­form­a­tion re­gard­ing this at­tack. And I will tell you, it has done so more than mind­ful of the Ir­aq ex­per­i­ence,” Kerry said. “We will not re­peat that mo­ment.”

The Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion briefed con­gres­sion­al lead­ers with these find­ings, which Kerry said, “are as clear as they are com­pel­ling.” Of­fi­cials say they will con­tin­ue do­ing so in the com­ing days as the pres­id­ent con­siders a re­sponse to the sus­pec­ted at­tack.

So, here’s the ad­min­is­tra­tion’s case for ac­tion:

The Weapons

The U.S. says it has known about the Syr­i­an chem­ic­al-weapons pro­gram for sev­er­al years be­cause of in­tel­li­gence ef­forts. Seni­or ad­min­is­tra­tion of­fi­cials say it is “old, vast, ex­pans­ive, very well run, tightly com­manded, and tightly con­trolled.” And while there are many mem­bers who op­er­ate in the chem­ic­al-weapons ap­par­at­us, Pres­id­ent Bashar al-As­sad is the fi­nal “de­cision-maker” with all at­tacks.

“He’s ul­ti­mately in charge of de­ploy­ment,” a U.S. of­fi­cial said Fri­day. The “over­all use and over­all pro­gram is firmly un­der his con­trol.”

The As­sad re­gime has sev­er­al types of chem­ic­als in its weapons stock­piles, in­clud­ing mus­tard, sar­in, and VX, and it has used these weapons “on a small scale” in the past year on its own people. To the Syr­i­an gov­ern­ment, the U.S. says, chem­ic­al weapons are just “one of many tools in its ar­sen­al.”

Pre­par­a­tion

Syr­i­an gov­ern­ment forces failed to gain con­trol of sev­er­al sub­urbs around the cap­it­al city, where op­pos­i­tion forces had strong­holds and op­er­a­tion­al bases.

U.S. of­fi­cials say that in the days lead­ing up to the at­tack, Syr­i­an chem­ic­al-weapons per­son­nel pre­pared those weapons near a fa­cil­ity used to mix the chem­ic­al agents. On the day of the at­tack, Aug. 21, “a Syr­i­an re­gime ele­ment pre­pared for a chem­ic­al-weapons at­tack in the Dam­as­cus area, in­clud­ing through the util­iz­a­tion of gas masks,” ac­cord­ing to the pa­per.

The At­tack

The at­tack oc­curred in an area where op­pos­i­tion forces had taken over or where the As­sad re­gime was at­tempt­ing to make ad­vances, ac­cord­ing to geo­spa­cial in­tel­li­gence and sources on the ground. Those neigh­bor­hoods are out­lined by a White House map:

 

In the early hours of last Wed­nes­day, the Syr­i­an gov­ern­ment star­ted a bar­rage of rock­et and ar­til­lery at­tacks on these neigh­bor­hoods. The fire­power came from ter­rit­ory con­trolled by the As­sad re­gime. About 90 minutes later, the first re­ports of chem­ic­al at­tacks star­ted flood­ing in, start­ing around 2:30 a.m. loc­al time, so start­ing the wave of so­cial-me­dia re­ports.

“With our own eyes we have seen the thou­sands of re­ports from 11 sep­ar­ate sites in the Dam­as­cus sub­urbs; all of them show and re­port vic­tims with breath­ing dif­fi­culties, people twitch­ing with spasms, cough­ing, rap­id-beat heart­beats, foam­ing at the mouth, un­con­scious­ness and death,” Kerry said Fri­day. “And we know it was or­din­ary Syr­i­an cit­izens who re­por­ted all of these hor­rors.”

These symp­toms that Kerry de­scribes are con­sist­ent with chem­ic­al at­tacks, which was con­firmed by Syr­i­an hos­pit­al per­son­nel. Three loc­al hos­pit­als, ac­cord­ing to the re­port, treated about 3,600 pa­tients with those symp­toms.

The Af­ter­math

The at­tack res­ul­ted in 1,429 deaths, at least 426 of whom were chil­dren, ac­cord­ing to dif­fer­ent sources cited by the pa­per. Seni­or ad­min­is­tra­tion of­fi­cials say this is a pre­lim­in­ary tally that could tra­gic­ally rise.

At­tempt­ing to hide evid­ence from an even­tu­al in­vest­ig­a­tion from U.N. per­son­nel, the As­sad re­gime shelled the area where the chem­ic­al at­tacks oc­curred and at a high­er fre­quency — of­fi­cials say shelling was four times the rate than in the pre­vi­ous 10 days.

Syr­i­an chem­ic­al-weapons per­son­nel were also told on that af­ter­noon to “cease op­er­a­tions,” ac­cord­ing to the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion pa­per.

U.S. Re­sponse

This at­tack, of­fi­cials ar­gue, broke norms set by the in­ter­na­tion­al com­munity in the af­ter­math of World War I. To pre­serve this norm and send a mes­sage to coun­tries that might con­tem­plate us­ing weapons of mass de­struc­tion, such as Ir­an or North Korea, the U.S. has to act, Kerry said. He con­tin­ued:

It mat­ters deeply to the cred­ib­il­ity in the fu­ture in­terests of the United States of Amer­ica and our al­lies. It mat­ters be­cause a lot of oth­er coun­tries whose policies chal­lenge these in­ter­na­tion­al norms are watch­ing. They are watch­ing. They want to see wheth­er the United States and our friends mean what we say. It is dir­ectly re­lated to our cred­ib­il­ity and wheth­er coun­tries still be­lieve the United States, when it says something, they are watch­ing to see if Syr­ia can get away with it be­cause then maybe they, too, can put the world at great­er risk.

“¦

Will they re­mem­ber that the As­sad re­gime was stopped from those weapons cur­rent or fu­ture use, or will they re­mem­ber that the world stood aside and cre­ated im­pun­ity?

Kerry said the U.S. couldn’t wait or rely on the United Na­tions, both in terms of the res­ults of its find­ings (it can’t de­term­ine who launched the chem­ic­al weapons) or in terms of the Se­cur­ity Coun­cil (there is “guar­an­teed Rus­si­an ob­struc­tion­ism”).

But many Amer­ic­ans have con­cerns about launch­ing an at­tack, however lim­ited in scale it might be or however dif­fer­ent it might look from the re­cent op­er­a­tion in Libya. The memory of Ir­aq is re­cent, and the U.S. still has troops in Afgh­anistan. To those cit­izens, Kerry has a warn­ing:

Fa­tigue does not ab­solve us of our re­spons­ib­il­ity. Just long­ing for peace does not ne­ces­sar­ily bring it about. And his­tory would judge us all ex­traordin­ar­ily harshly if we turned a blind eye to a dic­tat­or’s wan­ton use of weapons of mass de­struc­tion against all warn­ings, against all com­mon un­der­stand­ing of de­cency.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4412) }}

The Weapons

The U.S. says it has known about the Syr­i­an chem­ic­al-weapons pro­gram for sev­er­al years be­cause of in­tel­li­gence ef­forts. Seni­or ad­min­is­tra­tion of­fi­cials say it is “old, vast, ex­pans­ive, very well run, tightly com­manded, and tightly con­trolled.” And while there are many mem­bers who op­er­ate in the chem­ic­al-weapons ap­par­at­us, Pres­id­ent Bashar al-As­sad is the fi­nal “de­cision-maker” with all at­tacks.

“He’s ul­ti­mately in charge of de­ploy­ment,” a U.S. of­fi­cial said Fri­day. The “over­all use and over­all pro­gram is firmly un­der his con­trol.”

The As­sad re­gime has sev­er­al types of chem­ic­als in its weapons stock­piles, in­clud­ing mus­tard, sar­in, and VX, and it has used these weapons “on a small scale” in the past year on its own people. To the Syr­i­an gov­ern­ment, the U.S. says, chem­ic­al weapons are just “one of many tools in its ar­sen­al.”

Preparation

Syr­i­an gov­ern­ment forces failed to gain con­trol of sev­er­al sub­urbs around the cap­it­al city, where op­pos­i­tion forces had strong­holds and op­er­a­tion­al bases.

U.S. of­fi­cials say that in the days lead­ing up to the at­tack, Syr­i­an chem­ic­al-weapons per­son­nel pre­pared those weapons near a fa­cil­ity used to mix the chem­ic­al agents. On the day of the at­tack, Aug. 21, “a Syr­i­an re­gime ele­ment pre­pared for a chem­ic­al-weapons at­tack in the Dam­as­cus area, in­clud­ing through the util­iz­a­tion of gas masks,” ac­cord­ing to the pa­per.

The Attack

The at­tack oc­curred in an area where op­pos­i­tion forces had taken over or where the As­sad re­gime was at­tempt­ing to make ad­vances, ac­cord­ing to geo­spa­cial in­tel­li­gence and sources on the ground. Those neigh­bor­hoods are out­lined by a White House map:

 

In the early hours of last Wed­nes­day, the Syr­i­an gov­ern­ment star­ted a bar­rage of rock­et and ar­til­lery at­tacks on these neigh­bor­hoods. The fire­power came from ter­rit­ory con­trolled by the As­sad re­gime. About 90 minutes later, the first re­ports of chem­ic­al at­tacks star­ted flood­ing in, start­ing around 2:30 a.m. loc­al time, so start­ing the wave of so­cial-me­dia re­ports.

“With our own eyes we have seen the thou­sands of re­ports from 11 sep­ar­ate sites in the Dam­as­cus sub­urbs; all of them show and re­port vic­tims with breath­ing dif­fi­culties, people twitch­ing with spasms, cough­ing, rap­id-beat heart­beats, foam­ing at the mouth, un­con­scious­ness and death,” Kerry said Fri­day. “And we know it was or­din­ary Syr­i­an cit­izens who re­por­ted all of these hor­rors.”

These symp­toms that Kerry de­scribes are con­sist­ent with chem­ic­al at­tacks, which was con­firmed by Syr­i­an hos­pit­al per­son­nel. Three loc­al hos­pit­als, ac­cord­ing to the re­port, treated about 3,600 pa­tients with those symp­toms.

The Aftermath

The at­tack res­ul­ted in 1,429 deaths, at least 426 of whom were chil­dren, ac­cord­ing to dif­fer­ent sources cited by the pa­per. Seni­or ad­min­is­tra­tion of­fi­cials say this is a pre­lim­in­ary tally that could tra­gic­ally rise.

At­tempt­ing to hide evid­ence from an even­tu­al in­vest­ig­a­tion from U.N. per­son­nel, the As­sad re­gime shelled the area where the chem­ic­al at­tacks oc­curred and at a high­er fre­quency — of­fi­cials say shelling was four times the rate than in the pre­vi­ous 10 days.

Syr­i­an chem­ic­al-weapons per­son­nel were also told on that af­ter­noon to “cease op­er­a­tions,” ac­cord­ing to the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion pa­per.

U.S. Response

This at­tack, of­fi­cials ar­gue, broke norms set by the in­ter­na­tion­al com­munity in the af­ter­math of World War I. To pre­serve this norm and send a mes­sage to coun­tries that might con­tem­plate us­ing weapons of mass de­struc­tion, such as Ir­an or North Korea, the U.S. has to act, Kerry said. He con­tin­ued:

It mat­ters deeply to the cred­ib­il­ity in the fu­ture in­terests of the United States of Amer­ica and our al­lies. It mat­ters be­cause a lot of oth­er coun­tries whose policies chal­lenge these in­ter­na­tion­al norms are watch­ing. They are watch­ing. They want to see wheth­er the United States and our friends mean what we say. It is dir­ectly re­lated to our cred­ib­il­ity and wheth­er coun­tries still be­lieve the United States, when it says something, they are watch­ing to see if Syr­ia can get away with it be­cause then maybe they, too, can put the world at great­er risk.

“¦

Will they re­mem­ber that the As­sad re­gime was stopped from those weapons cur­rent or fu­ture use, or will they re­mem­ber that the world stood aside and cre­ated im­pun­ity?

Kerry said the U.S. couldn’t wait or rely on the United Na­tions, both in terms of the res­ults of its find­ings (it can’t de­term­ine who launched the chem­ic­al weapons) or in terms of the Se­cur­ity Coun­cil (there is “guar­an­teed Rus­si­an ob­struc­tion­ism”).

But many Amer­ic­ans have con­cerns about launch­ing an at­tack, however lim­ited in scale it might be or however dif­fer­ent it might look from the re­cent op­er­a­tion in Libya. The memory of Ir­aq is re­cent, and the U.S. still has troops in Afgh­anistan. To those cit­izens, Kerry has a warn­ing:

Fa­tigue does not ab­solve us of our re­spons­ib­il­ity. Just long­ing for peace does not ne­ces­sar­ily bring it about. And his­tory would judge us all ex­traordin­ar­ily harshly if we turned a blind eye to a dic­tat­or’s wan­ton use of weapons of mass de­struc­tion against all warn­ings, against all com­mon un­der­stand­ing of de­cency.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4412) }}

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
CITIZENS UNITED PT. 2?
Movie Based on ‘Clinton Cash’ to Debut at Cannes
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."

Source:
×