Senators Returning to Hear Obama’s Case for a Syria Strike

President Obama takes questions from the media in the East Room of the White House on June 29, 2011.
National Journal
Michael Catalin
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Michael Catalin
Sept. 2, 2013, 8:30 a.m.

Pres­id­ent Obama’s push to per­suade Con­gress to au­thor­ize a strike on Syr­ia presses ahead on Tues­day, as two top ad­min­is­tra­tion of­fi­cials will make the White House’s case be­fore the Sen­ate For­eign Re­la­tions Com­mit­tee.

Al­though a num­ber of law­makers have been in the Cap­it­ol for brief­ings with ad­min­is­tra­tion of­fi­cials, com­mit­tee mem­bers will be re­turn­ing nearly a week be­fore Con­gress is of­fi­cially due to re­turn from its Au­gust re­cess to con­sider Obama’s case to launch a mil­it­ary strike against dic­tat­or Bashar al-As­sad’s re­gime.

Sec­ret­ary of State John Kerry, De­fense Sec­ret­ary Chuck Hagel and Chair­man of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Mar­tin De­mp­sey will make the ad­min­is­tra­tion’s case to law­makers. Over the Labor Day week­end, Obama said that any strike would be “lim­ited in dur­a­tion and scope.” The mil­it­ary in­ter­ven­tion would ex­clude “boots on the ground,” the pres­id­ent said.

On Sat­urday, the ad­min­is­tra­tion de­livered the text of an au­thor­iz­a­tion for the use of force to Con­gress, seek­ing ap­prov­al “to use the Armed Forces of the United States as he de­term­ines to be ne­ces­sary and ap­pro­pri­ate in con­nec­tion with the use of chem­ic­al weapons.”

The ad­min­is­tra­tion ar­gues that the at­tack is ne­ces­sary to de­ter the pro­lif­er­a­tion of chem­ic­al weapons, which the White House says As­sad used against his people on Aug. 21. The ques­tion of launch­ing an at­tack arose be­cause Obama had drawn a so-called red line at the use of chem­ic­al weapons. Now that gov­ern­ment in­tel­li­gence re­portedly shows that line has been crossed, the ad­min­is­tra­tion is com­pelled to act.

Wheth­er Obama will win Con­gress’s ap­prov­al re­mains in doubt. Liber­tari­an-lean­ing Re­pub­lic­ans and lib­er­al Demo­crats ex­pressed skep­ti­cism about launch­ing an at­tack over the week­end. Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., the pres­id­ent pro tem­pore of the Sen­ate, told re­port­ers that the au­thor­iz­a­tion was too broad and would be amended, ac­cord­ing to me­dia re­ports. Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., mean­while, cast a pos­sible at­tack as a mis­take dur­ing an ap­pear­ance on Meet the Press.

Sen­ate Demo­crat­ic lead­ers quickly offered sup­port to the pres­id­ent. Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id, D-Nev., said mil­it­ary ac­tion would be “jus­ti­fied and ne­ces­sary.”

“I be­lieve the United States has a mor­al ob­lig­a­tion as well as a na­tion­al se­cur­ity in­terest in de­fend­ing in­no­cent lives against such at­ro­cit­ies,” Re­id said in a state­ment.

As­sist­ant Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Dick Durbin, D-Ill., praised the pres­id­ent, but he stopped short of call­ing for mil­it­ary ac­tion.

“If we can do something to dis­cour­age As­sad and oth­ers like him from us­ing chem­ic­al weapons without en­ga­ging in a war and without mak­ing a long-term mil­it­ary com­mit­ment of the United States, I’m open to that de­bate,” Durbin said in a state­ment.

Seek­ing to shore up sup­port among sen­at­ors, Obama in­vited Re­pub­lic­an hawks John Mc­Cain of Ari­zona and Lind­sey Gra­ham of South Car­o­lina to the White House on Monday, the As­so­ci­ated Press re­por­ted. Both Mc­Cain and Gra­ham sup­port a ro­bust strike aimed at top­pling As­sad’s re­gime.

House Speak­er John Boehner, mean­while, has said his cham­ber will con­sider the pres­id­ent’s au­thor­iz­a­tion re­quest when it re­turns the week of Sept. 9. In a sign of just how much op­pos­i­tion Obama will face from his polit­ic­al op­pon­ents in the House, Armed Ser­vices Chair­man Buck McK­eon, R-Cal­if., jabbed the White House over mil­it­ary cuts due to se­quest­ra­tion.

In ad­di­tion to the Sen­ate For­eign Re­la­tions Com­mit­tee hear­ing on Tues­day, a Sen­ate Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee hear­ing is ex­pec­ted this week and ad­min­is­tra­tion of­fi­cials are brief­ing mem­bers in both clas­si­fied and un­clas­si­fied set­tings, ac­cord­ing to the As­so­ci­ated Press. The White House gave a two-hour closed brief­ing to law­makers on Sunday, AP re­por­ted.

On Monday, ad­min­is­tra­tion of­fi­cials—in­clud­ing Kerry, Hagel, De­mp­sey, Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Ad­viser Susan Rice and Dir­ect­or of Na­tion­al In­tel­li­gence James Clap­per—briefed the House Demo­crat­ic Caucus in an un­clas­si­fied tele­con­fer­ence call that las­ted 70 minutes, ac­cord­ing to a House Demo­crat­ic aide.

What We're Following See More »
UNTIL DEC. 9, ANYWAY
Obama Signs Bill to Fund Government
2 hours ago
THE LATEST
REDSKINS IMPLICATIONS
SCOTUS to Hear Case on Offensive Trademarks
3 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

"The Supreme Court is taking up a First Amendment clash over the government’s refusal to register offensive trademarks, a case that could affect the Washington Redskins in their legal fight over the team name. The justices agreed Thursday to hear a dispute involving an Asian-American rock band called the Slants, but they did not act on a separate request to hear the higher-profile Redskins case at the same time." Still, any precedent set by the case could have ramifications for the Washington football team.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Bannon Still Collecting Royalties from ‘Seinfeld’
4 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The Hollywood Reporter takes a look at a little-known intersection of politics and entertainment, in which Trump campaign CEO Steve Bannon is still raking in residuals from Seinfeld. Here's the digest version: When Seinfeld was in its infancy, Ted Turner was in the process of acquiring its production company, Castle Rock, but he was under-capitalized. Bannon's fledgling media company put up the remaining funds, and he agreed to "participation rights" instead of a fee. "Seinfeld has reaped more than $3 billion in its post-network afterlife through syndication deals." Meanwhile, Bannon is "still cashing checks from Seinfeld, and observers say he has made nearly 25 times more off the Castle Rock deal than he had anticipated."

Source:
IT’S ALL CLINTON
Reliable Poll Data Coming in RE: Debate #1
4 hours ago
WHY WE CARE
NEXT THURSDAY
Trump Transition Team Meeting with Silicon Valley VIPs
6 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Donald Trump's "transition team will meet next week with representatives of the tech industry, multiple sources confirmed, even as their candidate largely has been largely shunned by Silicon Valley. The meeting, scheduled for next Thursday at the offices of law and lobbying firm BakerHostetler, will include trade groups like the Information Technology Industry Council and the Internet Association that represent major Silicon Valley companies."

Source:
×