Relax, Republicans, Obamacare’s Sherpas Pose No Threat

The latest front in the GOP assault against the president’s health care initiative involves so-called navigators who will help consumers find health insurance. But their concerns about privacy are overblown.

Nepalese Sherpas with luggage make their way through the Khumbu Icefall to Everest base camp, Nepal, Saturday, May 24, 2003. With the season for climbing Mount Everest coming to an end in the month and the unpredictable weather, many teams have aborted plans for attempting to climb the world's highest peak, commemorating the 50th anniversary of Sir Edmund Hillary and Tenzing Norgay's climb to the summit on May 29, 1953. 
ASSOCIATED PRESS
Catherine Hollander
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Catherine Hollander
Sept. 5, 2013, 4:10 p.m.

The latest cri­ti­cism of Obama­care has centered on the “nav­ig­at­or” or­gan­iz­a­tions charged with help­ing Amer­ic­ans find health in­sur­ance cov­er­age un­der the law. The Af­ford­able Care Act tasks nav­ig­at­ors with edu­cat­ing the pub­lic about health re­form, dis­trib­ut­ing “fair and im­par­tial” in­form­a­tion about in­sur­ance plans, and provid­ing en­roll­ment as­sist­ance in some in­stances. In ex­change for per­form­ing these du­ties, nav­ig­at­or or­gan­iz­a­tions re­ceive fed­er­al grants; $67 mil­lion was dis­trib­uted to 105 non­profits and com­munity-based or­gan­iz­a­tions just last month.

Re­pub­lic­an crit­ics have fo­cused re­cently on wheth­er these coun­selors pose a threat to pri­vacy. “Amer­ic­ans will de­tail their very per­son­al health and fin­an­cial in­form­a­tion to these in­di­vidu­als,” ac­cord­ing to an Aug. 15 re­lease from the GOP-led House En­ergy and Com­merce Com­mit­tee. “The sheer volume of per­son­al in­form­a­tion col­lec­ted by nav­ig­at­ors raises ser­i­ous pri­vacy con­cerns.” Thir­teen Re­pub­lic­an state at­tor­neys gen­er­al wrote to Health and Hu­man Ser­vices Sec­ret­ary Kath­leen Se­beli­us ex­press­ing sim­il­ar mis­giv­ings.

But the nav­ig­at­or pro­gram has a pre­ced­ent, one that sug­gests the con­cerns may be over­blown: the State Health In­sur­ance As­sist­ance Pro­gram, which was en­acted through the Om­ni­bus Budget Re­con­cili­ation Act of 1990 to of­fer free coun­sel­ing to Medi­care be­ne­fi­ciar­ies. SHIP coun­selors were the mod­el for Obama­care’s nav­ig­at­ors. “The no­tion that this is some un­heard of “¦ in­cur­sion in­to people’s lives is about as far from real­ity as it could be,” says Sara Rosen­baum, a pro­fess­or at George Wash­ing­ton Uni­versity’s School of Pub­lic Health and Health Ser­vices. “This is ex­actly what Medi­care SHIPs do all the time.”

SHIP staff mem­bers played a key out­reach role after Con­gress passed the Medi­care Pre­scrip­tion Drug, Im­prove­ment, and Mod­ern­iz­a­tion Act of 2003. The le­gis­la­tion in­tro­duced pre­scrip­tion-drug be­ne­fits — Part D, which was a com­plic­ated ad­di­tion to the cov­er­age offered un­der Medi­care avail­able through en­roll­ment in private plans. In the spring of 2005, just half a year be­fore open en­roll­ment began, 66 per­cent of seni­ors polled by the Kais­er Fam­ily Found­a­tion said they didn’t think they had enough in­form­a­tion to un­der­stand how the be­ne­fit would af­fect them. Enter SHIPs.

“With Part D, they were in­cred­ibly im­port­ant,” said Laura Sum­mer, a seni­or re­search schol­ar at Geor­getown Uni­versity’s Health Policy In­sti­tute. In 2008, Sum­mer coau­thored a re­port on how the early Part D rol­lout went, based on the find­ings of a sur­vey of 660 coun­selors, pro­gram man­agers, and oth­ers who worked with be­ne­fi­ciar­ies. “The avail­ab­il­ity of one-on-one coun­sel­ing, in­clud­ing help from the State Health In­sur­ance Pro­gram (SHIP) coun­selors, was cited most com­monly in re­sponse to an open-ended ques­tion re­gard­ing as­pects of the pro­gram that have been par­tic­u­larly help­ful for Part D be­ne­fi­ciar­ies,” she and her col­leagues wrote.

SHIP coun­selors had ac­cess to in­form­a­tion to de­term­ine wheth­er in­di­vidu­als might qual­i­fy for Part D’s low-in­come sub­sidy, as well as cer­tain per­son­al health in­form­a­tion that helped them ad­vise on plan se­lec­tion. Na­tion­al Journ­al in­ter­viewed a num­ber of people who stud­ied the rol­lout of Medi­care Part D, none of whom re­called the kind of con­cern over pri­vacy voiced by today’s op­pon­ents of Obama­care. News­pa­per re­ports and con­gres­sion­al tran­scripts from 2005 to 2007 also sug­gest that per­son­al in­form­a­tion was not a key worry dur­ing the early days of Part D en­roll­ment, al­though there was a broad­er dis­cus­sion tak­ing place in Con­gress over how to re­spect pa­tient pri­vacy while mod­ern­iz­ing health-in­form­a­tion tech­no­logy.

Any new health care pro­gram is ripe for fraud. Part D was, and the Af­ford­able Care Act is likely to be, too. Bon­nie Burns, a policy spe­cial­ist with Cali­for­nia Health Ad­voc­ates, a Medi­care ad­vocacy non­profit, re­calls the scam artists who have cropped up as the Medi­care pro­gram evolved over the years. “Every single time there’s any change in Medi­care, Medi­care be­ne­fi­ciar­ies get flooded with these mail­ings that say, “˜Your health care is chan­ging, Con­gress has done X, Y, Z.’ And those are at­tempts to reach Medi­care be­ne­fi­ciar­ies to sell them something,” Burns says. But she’s not aware of any in­stances of SHIP coun­selors com­mit­ting fraud in Cali­for­nia in the more than two dec­ades she’s been in­volved with Medi­care coun­sel­ing.

HHS has prom­ised that nav­ig­at­ors, who will be re­quired to com­plete 20 hours of train­ing, will be in­struc­ted on pri­vacy and se­cur­ity stand­ards. The GOP state at­tor­neys gen­er­al counter that the gov­ern­ment’s pri­vacy safe­guards are “vague” and “will res­ult in im­prop­erly screened or in­ad­equately trained per­son­nel” who will be “more prone to mis­ap­pro­pri­ate — ac­ci­dent­ally or in­ten­tion­ally — the private data of con­sumers.”

But Larry Ko­cot, who was a seni­or ad­viser to the ad­min­is­trat­or of the Cen­ters for Medi­care and Medi­caid Ser­vices dur­ing the Part D rol­lout and was heav­ily in­volved in its launch, says such as­sist­ance should be viewed as a case of risk versus re­ward. Part D showed how im­port­ant in-per­son coun­sel­ing is when ex­plain­ing a com­plex new health care law. “With ap­pro­pri­ate se­lec­tion, safe­guards, and mon­it­or­ing,” Ko­cot says, “the be­ne­fits clearly out­weigh the risks.”

The Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion faces per­haps an even more daunt­ing chal­lenge than the Bush ad­min­is­tra­tion did dur­ing Part D’s early days. Half of Amer­ic­ans say they don’t have enough in­form­a­tion about the Af­ford­able Care Act to un­der­stand how it will af­fect them and their fam­ily, ac­cord­ing to Kais­er’s Au­gust health track­ing poll. Open en­roll­ment be­gins in three weeks. The pop­u­la­tion the gov­ern­ment is seek­ing to get covered is more di­verse than the Part D con­stitu­ency and may nev­er have had in­sur­ance be­fore — which is why coun­sel­ing will be para­mount. Con­cerns over se­cur­ity should be taken ser­i­ously and mon­itored. But the Part D pre­ced­ent sug­gests that nav­ig­at­ors can play an im­port­ant role.

What We're Following See More »
IT’S OFFICIAL
Trump to Nominate Carson to Lead HUD
2 hours ago
THE LATEST

As has been rumored for a week, Donald Trump will nominate Ben Carson, his former rival, to lead the Department of Housing and Urban Development. In a statement, Trump said, "We have talked at length about my urban renewal agenda and our message of economic revival, very much including our inner cities. Ben shares my optimism about the future of our country and is part of ensuring that this is a Presidency representing all Americans. He is a tough competitor and never gives up."

Source:
TOO COSTLY, SAYS GREEN PARTY
Stein Drops Pennsylvania Recount
2 hours ago
THE LATEST

"Supporters of Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein on Saturday withdrew a last-ditch lawsuit in Pennsylvania state court aimed at forcing a statewide ballot recount, another major setback in the effort to verify the votes in three states that provided President-elect Donald Trump his margin of victory. Ms. Stein’s campaign announced in a statement Saturday that the Pennsylvania lawsuit had been dropped after the court demanded that a $1 million bond be posted by the 100 Pennsylvania residents who brought the suit."

Source:
ANOTHER MORNING TWEETSTORM
Trump Threatens 35% Tariff on Companies that Move Overseas
2 hours ago
THE LATEST

In a series of early-morning tweets on Sunday, Donald Trump threatened companies that attempt to relocate out of the country. "Any business that leaves our country for another country, fires its employees, builds a new factory or plant in the other country, and then thinks it will sell its product back into the U.S. without retribution or consequence, is WRONG!," he wrote. "There will be a tax on our soon to be strong border of 35% for these companies."

Source:
EASEMENT DENIED
Army Corps Stopping Work on Dakota Pipeline
2 hours ago
THE LATEST

"The Army Corps of Engineers has decided to deny the easement for the construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline, the National Congress of American Indians said in a statement Sunday. The decision would essentially halt the construction of the oil pipeline right above the Standing Rock Sioux Reservation and it also comes as demonstrators across the country flocked to North Dakota in protest."

Source:
LOSES REFERENDUM VOTE
Italian Prime Minister to Step Down
2 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Italian Prime Minister Matteo Renzi will submit his resignation today, after a referendum vote went against his side. The development represents yet another win for populism around the globe, as the populist 5 Stars Movement, Renzi's chief rivals, took 60 percent of the vote. Renzi claimed the reforms "were vital to modernize Italy."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login